Cargando…

Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches

BACKGROUND: Quantifying women's empowerment has become the focus of attention of many international organizations and scholars. We aimed to describe quantitative indicators of women's empowerment that are based on individual-level data. METHODS: In this scoping review, we searched PubMed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Janaína Calu, Saad, Ghada E., Hellwig, Franciele, Maia, Maria Fatima S., Barros, Aluísio J. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1231790
_version_ 1785113252485660672
author Costa, Janaína Calu
Saad, Ghada E.
Hellwig, Franciele
Maia, Maria Fatima S.
Barros, Aluísio J. D.
author_facet Costa, Janaína Calu
Saad, Ghada E.
Hellwig, Franciele
Maia, Maria Fatima S.
Barros, Aluísio J. D.
author_sort Costa, Janaína Calu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantifying women's empowerment has become the focus of attention of many international organizations and scholars. We aimed to describe quantitative indicators of women's empowerment that are based on individual-level data. METHODS: In this scoping review, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google, and Google Scholar for publications describing the operationalization of measures of women's empowerment. RESULTS: We identified 36 studies published since 2004, half of them since 2019, and most from low- and middle-income countries. Twelve studies were based on data from the Demographic and Health Surveys and used 56 different variables from the questionnaires (ranging from one to 25 per study) to measure the overall empowerment of women 15–49 years. One study focused on rural women, two included married and unmarried women, and one analyzed the couple's responses. Factor analysis and principal component analysis were the most common approaches used. Among the 24 studies based on other surveys, ten analyzed overall empowerment, while the others addressed sexual and reproductive health (4 studies), agriculture (3) and livestock (1), water and sanitation (2), nutrition (2), agency (1), and psychological empowerment (1). These measures were mainly based on data from single countries and factor analysis was the most frequently analytical method used. We observed a diversity of indicator definitions and domains and a lack of consensus in terms of what the proposed indicators measure. CONCLUSION: The proposed women's empowerment indicators represent an advance in the field of gender and development monitoring. However, the empowerment definitions used vary widely in concept and in the domains/dimensions considered, which, in turn influence or are influenced by the adopted methodologies. It remains a challenge to find a balance between the need for a measure suitable for comparisons across populations and over time and the incorporation of country-specific elements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10538115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105381152023-09-29 Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches Costa, Janaína Calu Saad, Ghada E. Hellwig, Franciele Maia, Maria Fatima S. Barros, Aluísio J. D. Front Sociol Sociology BACKGROUND: Quantifying women's empowerment has become the focus of attention of many international organizations and scholars. We aimed to describe quantitative indicators of women's empowerment that are based on individual-level data. METHODS: In this scoping review, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google, and Google Scholar for publications describing the operationalization of measures of women's empowerment. RESULTS: We identified 36 studies published since 2004, half of them since 2019, and most from low- and middle-income countries. Twelve studies were based on data from the Demographic and Health Surveys and used 56 different variables from the questionnaires (ranging from one to 25 per study) to measure the overall empowerment of women 15–49 years. One study focused on rural women, two included married and unmarried women, and one analyzed the couple's responses. Factor analysis and principal component analysis were the most common approaches used. Among the 24 studies based on other surveys, ten analyzed overall empowerment, while the others addressed sexual and reproductive health (4 studies), agriculture (3) and livestock (1), water and sanitation (2), nutrition (2), agency (1), and psychological empowerment (1). These measures were mainly based on data from single countries and factor analysis was the most frequently analytical method used. We observed a diversity of indicator definitions and domains and a lack of consensus in terms of what the proposed indicators measure. CONCLUSION: The proposed women's empowerment indicators represent an advance in the field of gender and development monitoring. However, the empowerment definitions used vary widely in concept and in the domains/dimensions considered, which, in turn influence or are influenced by the adopted methodologies. It remains a challenge to find a balance between the need for a measure suitable for comparisons across populations and over time and the incorporation of country-specific elements. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10538115/ /pubmed/37780693 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1231790 Text en Copyright © 2023 Costa, Saad, Hellwig, Maia and Barros. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sociology
Costa, Janaína Calu
Saad, Ghada E.
Hellwig, Franciele
Maia, Maria Fatima S.
Barros, Aluísio J. D.
Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
title Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
title_full Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
title_fullStr Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
title_full_unstemmed Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
title_short Measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
title_sort measures of women's empowerment based on individual-level data: a literature review with a focus on the methodological approaches
topic Sociology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780693
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1231790
work_keys_str_mv AT costajanainacalu measuresofwomensempowermentbasedonindividualleveldataaliteraturereviewwithafocusonthemethodologicalapproaches
AT saadghadae measuresofwomensempowermentbasedonindividualleveldataaliteraturereviewwithafocusonthemethodologicalapproaches
AT hellwigfranciele measuresofwomensempowermentbasedonindividualleveldataaliteraturereviewwithafocusonthemethodologicalapproaches
AT maiamariafatimas measuresofwomensempowermentbasedonindividualleveldataaliteraturereviewwithafocusonthemethodologicalapproaches
AT barrosaluisiojd measuresofwomensempowermentbasedonindividualleveldataaliteraturereviewwithafocusonthemethodologicalapproaches