Cargando…

A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study

STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi Consensus and Observational Study. OBJECTIVE: Instability in spinal tuberculosis (STB) leads to disabling spinal deformity and neurodeficit. Identifying and estimating instability remains subjective, mainly based on experience. This study aims to develop an objective sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan, Soundararajan, Dilip Chand Raja, Reddy, Gurijala Jyotheswara, Shetty, Ajoy P., Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221080102
_version_ 1785113304974229504
author Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Soundararajan, Dilip Chand Raja
Reddy, Gurijala Jyotheswara
Shetty, Ajoy P.
Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
author_facet Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Soundararajan, Dilip Chand Raja
Reddy, Gurijala Jyotheswara
Shetty, Ajoy P.
Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
author_sort Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi Consensus and Observational Study. OBJECTIVE: Instability in spinal tuberculosis (STB) leads to disabling spinal deformity and neurodeficit. Identifying and estimating instability remains subjective, mainly based on experience. This study aims to develop an objective scoring system to determine instability in STB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 4 phases. (1) A panel of 10 experienced spine surgeons developed a questionnaire based on literature. (2) 68 spine surgeons from 12 countries opined on the importance of each factor in a survey. Five factors deemed important by >70% of participants were further analyzed (3) 60 representative cases of STB were analyzed for instability. A preliminary scoring system was developed, a threshold score for determining instability was derived, and (4) Results were validated. RESULTS: All the 5 factors (“Spine at risk” signs, severity of vertebral body loss, Cervicothoracic/Thoracolumbar junction involvement, age ≤15, and kyphotic deformity ≥30°) considered important by >70% of participants were associated with instability and included in scoring: age ≤15 years (P-value, 0.05), cervicothoracic/thoracolumbar junction involvement (P-value, 0.028), sagittal deformity angle ratio (DAR) ≥ 15° (P-value, <.001), vertebral body loss-segmental ratio ≥.5 (P-value, <.001), and presence of spine at risk signs (P-value, <.001). A total score of ≥3/09 indicated definite instability with good sensitivity (77%) and excellent specificity (100%). Repeatability assessment showed a good agreement (.9625), and Cohen’s kappa coefficient was strong (.809). CONCLUSION: A simple objective scoring system for predicting instability in STB has been developed using 5 main factors; young age, junctional involvement, severity of the deformity, vertebral body loss, and presence of spine at risk signs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10538347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105383472023-09-29 A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan Soundararajan, Dilip Chand Raja Reddy, Gurijala Jyotheswara Shetty, Ajoy P. Kanna, Rishi Mugesh Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi Consensus and Observational Study. OBJECTIVE: Instability in spinal tuberculosis (STB) leads to disabling spinal deformity and neurodeficit. Identifying and estimating instability remains subjective, mainly based on experience. This study aims to develop an objective scoring system to determine instability in STB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 4 phases. (1) A panel of 10 experienced spine surgeons developed a questionnaire based on literature. (2) 68 spine surgeons from 12 countries opined on the importance of each factor in a survey. Five factors deemed important by >70% of participants were further analyzed (3) 60 representative cases of STB were analyzed for instability. A preliminary scoring system was developed, a threshold score for determining instability was derived, and (4) Results were validated. RESULTS: All the 5 factors (“Spine at risk” signs, severity of vertebral body loss, Cervicothoracic/Thoracolumbar junction involvement, age ≤15, and kyphotic deformity ≥30°) considered important by >70% of participants were associated with instability and included in scoring: age ≤15 years (P-value, 0.05), cervicothoracic/thoracolumbar junction involvement (P-value, 0.028), sagittal deformity angle ratio (DAR) ≥ 15° (P-value, <.001), vertebral body loss-segmental ratio ≥.5 (P-value, <.001), and presence of spine at risk signs (P-value, <.001). A total score of ≥3/09 indicated definite instability with good sensitivity (77%) and excellent specificity (100%). Repeatability assessment showed a good agreement (.9625), and Cohen’s kappa coefficient was strong (.809). CONCLUSION: A simple objective scoring system for predicting instability in STB has been developed using 5 main factors; young age, junctional involvement, severity of the deformity, vertebral body loss, and presence of spine at risk signs. SAGE Publications 2022-02-26 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10538347/ /pubmed/35220789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221080102 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan
Soundararajan, Dilip Chand Raja
Reddy, Gurijala Jyotheswara
Shetty, Ajoy P.
Kanna, Rishi Mugesh
A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study
title A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study
title_full A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study
title_fullStr A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study
title_full_unstemmed A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study
title_short A Validated Score for Evaluating Spinal Instability to Assess Surgical Candidacy in Active Spinal Tuberculosis—An Evidence Based Approach and Multinational Expert Consensus Study
title_sort validated score for evaluating spinal instability to assess surgical candidacy in active spinal tuberculosis—an evidence based approach and multinational expert consensus study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35220789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221080102
work_keys_str_mv AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan avalidatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT soundararajandilipchandraja avalidatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT reddygurijalajyotheswara avalidatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT shettyajoyp avalidatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT kannarishimugesh avalidatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT rajasekaranshanmuganathan validatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT soundararajandilipchandraja validatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT reddygurijalajyotheswara validatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT shettyajoyp validatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy
AT kannarishimugesh validatedscoreforevaluatingspinalinstabilitytoassesssurgicalcandidacyinactivespinaltuberculosisanevidencebasedapproachandmultinationalexpertconsensusstudy