Cargando…

Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze real-world practice patterns and graft survival after corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis in the Netherlands. METHODS: All consecutive keratoplasties for infectious keratitis registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veugen, Judith M. J., Dunker, Suryan L., Wolffs, Petra F. G., Savelkoul, Paul H. M., Winkens, Bjorn, van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M., Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A., Dickman, Mor M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cornea 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003218
_version_ 1785113338979549184
author Veugen, Judith M. J.
Dunker, Suryan L.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Savelkoul, Paul H. M.
Winkens, Bjorn
van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M.
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
Dickman, Mor M.
author_facet Veugen, Judith M. J.
Dunker, Suryan L.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Savelkoul, Paul H. M.
Winkens, Bjorn
van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M.
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
Dickman, Mor M.
author_sort Veugen, Judith M. J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze real-world practice patterns and graft survival after corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis in the Netherlands. METHODS: All consecutive keratoplasties for infectious keratitis registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were included. Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves with Cox regression to compare the 3 most common pathogens with subgroup analysis for type and reason of transplantation, sex, and graft size. Multivariable analysis was performed using the same explanatory factors. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, 1111 keratoplasties for infectious keratitis were registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry. The most common pathogens were viruses (n = 437), bacteria (n = 271), and Acanthamoeba (n = 121). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching did not provide a significant survival benefit, whereas emergency procedures showed worse graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, P = 0.120; HR = 2.73, P < 0.001, respectively]. Graft size >8.5 mm was significantly worse than graft size 8.5 mm (HR = 2.062, P = 0.010). In therapeutic keratoplasty, graft survival was significantly worse for Acanthamoeba than viral keratitis (HR = 2.36, P = 0.008). In the multivariable model, adjusting for graft size, type, and reason for transplantation, viral and bacterial keratitis did not differ significantly in graft survival, and Acanthamoeba showed a significantly worse prognosis (vs. viral keratitis, HR = 2.30, P < 0.001; bacterial keratitis, HR = 2.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Viral keratitis was the most common indication for transplantation, followed by bacterial and Acanthamoeba keratitis. HLA matching did not offer protection over elective non-HLA–matched procedures, whereas emergency procedures and grafts sized >8.5 mm showed poor survival. In optical keratoplasty, survival is high for all pathogens, whereas in therapeutic keratoplasty Acanthamoeba shows poor outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10538606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cornea
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105386062023-09-29 Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study Veugen, Judith M. J. Dunker, Suryan L. Wolffs, Petra F. G. Savelkoul, Paul H. M. Winkens, Bjorn van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M. Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. Dickman, Mor M. Cornea Clinical Science PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze real-world practice patterns and graft survival after corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis in the Netherlands. METHODS: All consecutive keratoplasties for infectious keratitis registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were included. Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves with Cox regression to compare the 3 most common pathogens with subgroup analysis for type and reason of transplantation, sex, and graft size. Multivariable analysis was performed using the same explanatory factors. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2017, 1111 keratoplasties for infectious keratitis were registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry. The most common pathogens were viruses (n = 437), bacteria (n = 271), and Acanthamoeba (n = 121). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching did not provide a significant survival benefit, whereas emergency procedures showed worse graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, P = 0.120; HR = 2.73, P < 0.001, respectively]. Graft size >8.5 mm was significantly worse than graft size 8.5 mm (HR = 2.062, P = 0.010). In therapeutic keratoplasty, graft survival was significantly worse for Acanthamoeba than viral keratitis (HR = 2.36, P = 0.008). In the multivariable model, adjusting for graft size, type, and reason for transplantation, viral and bacterial keratitis did not differ significantly in graft survival, and Acanthamoeba showed a significantly worse prognosis (vs. viral keratitis, HR = 2.30, P < 0.001; bacterial keratitis, HR = 2.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Viral keratitis was the most common indication for transplantation, followed by bacterial and Acanthamoeba keratitis. HLA matching did not offer protection over elective non-HLA–matched procedures, whereas emergency procedures and grafts sized >8.5 mm showed poor survival. In optical keratoplasty, survival is high for all pathogens, whereas in therapeutic keratoplasty Acanthamoeba shows poor outcome. Cornea 2023-11 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10538606/ /pubmed/36737861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003218 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Veugen, Judith M. J.
Dunker, Suryan L.
Wolffs, Petra F. G.
Savelkoul, Paul H. M.
Winkens, Bjorn
van den Biggelaar, Frank J. H. M.
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A.
Dickman, Mor M.
Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study
title Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study
title_full Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study
title_fullStr Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study
title_full_unstemmed Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study
title_short Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study
title_sort corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis: a prospective dutch registry study
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003218
work_keys_str_mv AT veugenjudithmj cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT dunkersuryanl cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT wolffspetrafg cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT savelkoulpaulhm cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT winkensbjorn cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT vandenbiggelaarfrankjhm cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT nuijtsrudymma cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy
AT dickmanmorm cornealtransplantationforinfectiouskeratitisaprospectivedutchregistrystudy