Cargando…

Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis

Notational analysis and new technologies have allowed a better understanding of tactical actions in tennis. In particular, the combined analysis of different variables affecting performance is necessary to understand the relationships between actions in competition. The aim of this research was to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prieto-Lage, Iván, Paramés-González, Adrián, Torres-Santos, Daniel, Argibay-González, Juan Carlos, Reguera-López-de-la-Osa, Xoana, Gutiérrez-Santiago, Alfonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286076
_version_ 1785113348793171968
author Prieto-Lage, Iván
Paramés-González, Adrián
Torres-Santos, Daniel
Argibay-González, Juan Carlos
Reguera-López-de-la-Osa, Xoana
Gutiérrez-Santiago, Alfonso
author_facet Prieto-Lage, Iván
Paramés-González, Adrián
Torres-Santos, Daniel
Argibay-González, Juan Carlos
Reguera-López-de-la-Osa, Xoana
Gutiérrez-Santiago, Alfonso
author_sort Prieto-Lage, Iván
collection PubMed
description Notational analysis and new technologies have allowed a better understanding of tactical actions in tennis. In particular, the combined analysis of different variables affecting performance is necessary to understand the relationships between actions in competition. The aim of this research was to analyse the probability of winning a point in men’s professional tennis based on the most relevant variables affecting performance in this sport. A total of 4,669 points were analysed on three different court surfaces from the final rounds (from the quarter-finals onwards) of three of the four Grand Slam tournaments in the 2021 season. An observational methodology was applied. Different analysis techniques were used to obtain the results: descriptive and chi-square with a significance level of p<0.05. First serve effectiveness (point won) was 69% on clay, 75% on grass and 75% on hard court. Second serve effectiveness (point won) was around 55% regardless of the surface. The majority of points, between 65% and 77% depending on the court surface, ended with a short rally (between one and four shots). Approximately 80% of the points played with first serve and short rally were won by the serving player. With first serve and medium length rallies, the probability of winning the point is similar between server (range 49–55%) and receiver on any court surface. The study reveals a set of patterns (based on the combination of information from the variables analysed) that determine the probability of winning a point. Descriptive data from this research could help coaches and players on match strategy at the highest levels of elite men’s single tennis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10538650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105386502023-09-29 Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis Prieto-Lage, Iván Paramés-González, Adrián Torres-Santos, Daniel Argibay-González, Juan Carlos Reguera-López-de-la-Osa, Xoana Gutiérrez-Santiago, Alfonso PLoS One Research Article Notational analysis and new technologies have allowed a better understanding of tactical actions in tennis. In particular, the combined analysis of different variables affecting performance is necessary to understand the relationships between actions in competition. The aim of this research was to analyse the probability of winning a point in men’s professional tennis based on the most relevant variables affecting performance in this sport. A total of 4,669 points were analysed on three different court surfaces from the final rounds (from the quarter-finals onwards) of three of the four Grand Slam tournaments in the 2021 season. An observational methodology was applied. Different analysis techniques were used to obtain the results: descriptive and chi-square with a significance level of p<0.05. First serve effectiveness (point won) was 69% on clay, 75% on grass and 75% on hard court. Second serve effectiveness (point won) was around 55% regardless of the surface. The majority of points, between 65% and 77% depending on the court surface, ended with a short rally (between one and four shots). Approximately 80% of the points played with first serve and short rally were won by the serving player. With first serve and medium length rallies, the probability of winning the point is similar between server (range 49–55%) and receiver on any court surface. The study reveals a set of patterns (based on the combination of information from the variables analysed) that determine the probability of winning a point. Descriptive data from this research could help coaches and players on match strategy at the highest levels of elite men’s single tennis. Public Library of Science 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10538650/ /pubmed/37768928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286076 Text en © 2023 Prieto-Lage et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prieto-Lage, Iván
Paramés-González, Adrián
Torres-Santos, Daniel
Argibay-González, Juan Carlos
Reguera-López-de-la-Osa, Xoana
Gutiérrez-Santiago, Alfonso
Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
title Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
title_full Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
title_fullStr Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
title_full_unstemmed Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
title_short Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
title_sort match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men’s singles tennis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286076
work_keys_str_mv AT prietolageivan matchanalysisandprobabilityofwinningapointinelitemenssinglestennis
AT paramesgonzalezadrian matchanalysisandprobabilityofwinningapointinelitemenssinglestennis
AT torressantosdaniel matchanalysisandprobabilityofwinningapointinelitemenssinglestennis
AT argibaygonzalezjuancarlos matchanalysisandprobabilityofwinningapointinelitemenssinglestennis
AT regueralopezdelaosaxoana matchanalysisandprobabilityofwinningapointinelitemenssinglestennis
AT gutierrezsantiagoalfonso matchanalysisandprobabilityofwinningapointinelitemenssinglestennis