Cargando…

Molecular characterization of juvenile fish from the Amazon estuary using DNA barcoding approach

The efficiency of the DNA barcoding relies on sequencing fragment of the Cytochrome C Subunit I (COI) gene, which has been claimed as a tool to biodiversity identification from distinct groups. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to identify juvenile fish species along an estuary of Caeté River...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lutz, Ítalo, Martins, Thais, Araújo, Felipe, Ferreira, Charles, Santana, Paula, Miranda, Josy, Matos, Suane, Sousa, Jefferson, Pereira, Luciano, Bentes, Bianca, da Silva, Raimundo, Veneza, Ivana, Sampaio, Iracilda, Vallinoto, Marcelo, Gomes, Grazielle Evangelista
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292232
Descripción
Sumario:The efficiency of the DNA barcoding relies on sequencing fragment of the Cytochrome C Subunit I (COI) gene, which has been claimed as a tool to biodiversity identification from distinct groups. Accordingly, the goal of this study was to identify juvenile fish species along an estuary of Caeté River in the Brazilian Blue Amazon based on. For this purpose, we applied the DNA barcoding and discuss this approach as a tool for discrimination of species in early ontogenetic stages. A 500-bp fragment was obtained from 74 individuals, belonging to 23 species, 20 genera, 13 families and seven orders. About 70% of the 46 haplotypes revealed congruence between morphological and molecular species identification, while 8% of them failed in identification of taxa and 22% demonstrated morphological misidentification. These results proved that COI fragments were effective to diagnose fish species at early life stages, allowing identifying all samples to a species-specific status, except for some taxa whose COI sequences remain unavailable in public databases. Therefore, we recommend the incorporation of DNA barcoding to provide additional support to traditional identification, especially in morphologically controversial groups. In addition, periodic updates and comparative analyses in public COI datasets are encouraged.