Cargando…

Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries

[Image: see text] Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alnammi, Moayad, Liu, Shengchao, Ericksen, Spencer S., Ananiev, Gene E., Voter, Andrew F., Guo, Song, Keck, James L., Hoffmann, F. Michael, Wildman, Scott A., Gitter, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37625010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00912
_version_ 1785113406001381376
author Alnammi, Moayad
Liu, Shengchao
Ericksen, Spencer S.
Ananiev, Gene E.
Voter, Andrew F.
Guo, Song
Keck, James L.
Hoffmann, F. Michael
Wildman, Scott A.
Gitter, Anthony
author_facet Alnammi, Moayad
Liu, Shengchao
Ericksen, Spencer S.
Ananiev, Gene E.
Voter, Andrew F.
Guo, Song
Keck, James L.
Hoffmann, F. Michael
Wildman, Scott A.
Gitter, Anthony
author_sort Alnammi, Moayad
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables training models on known active and inactive compounds and extrapolating to much larger chemical libraries. However, there has been limited experimental validation of these methods in practical applications on large commercially available or synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries. Through a prospective evaluation with the bacterial protein–protein interaction PriA-SSB, we demonstrate that ligand-based virtual screening can identify many active compounds in large commercial libraries. We use cross-validation to compare different types of supervised learning models and select a random forest (RF) classifier as the best model for this target. When predicting the activity of more than 8 million compounds from Aldrich Market Select, the RF substantially outperforms a naïve baseline based on chemical structure similarity. 48% of the RF’s 701 selected compounds are active. The RF model easily scales to score one billion compounds from the synthesize-on-demand Enamine REAL database. We tested 68 chemically diverse top predictions from Enamine REAL and observed 31 hits (46%), including one with an IC(50) value of 1.3 μM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10538940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105389402023-09-29 Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries Alnammi, Moayad Liu, Shengchao Ericksen, Spencer S. Ananiev, Gene E. Voter, Andrew F. Guo, Song Keck, James L. Hoffmann, F. Michael Wildman, Scott A. Gitter, Anthony J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables training models on known active and inactive compounds and extrapolating to much larger chemical libraries. However, there has been limited experimental validation of these methods in practical applications on large commercially available or synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries. Through a prospective evaluation with the bacterial protein–protein interaction PriA-SSB, we demonstrate that ligand-based virtual screening can identify many active compounds in large commercial libraries. We use cross-validation to compare different types of supervised learning models and select a random forest (RF) classifier as the best model for this target. When predicting the activity of more than 8 million compounds from Aldrich Market Select, the RF substantially outperforms a naïve baseline based on chemical structure similarity. 48% of the RF’s 701 selected compounds are active. The RF model easily scales to score one billion compounds from the synthesize-on-demand Enamine REAL database. We tested 68 chemically diverse top predictions from Enamine REAL and observed 31 hits (46%), including one with an IC(50) value of 1.3 μM. American Chemical Society 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10538940/ /pubmed/37625010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00912 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Alnammi, Moayad
Liu, Shengchao
Ericksen, Spencer S.
Ananiev, Gene E.
Voter, Andrew F.
Guo, Song
Keck, James L.
Hoffmann, F. Michael
Wildman, Scott A.
Gitter, Anthony
Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
title Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
title_full Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
title_fullStr Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
title_short Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
title_sort evaluating scalable supervised learning for synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37625010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00912
work_keys_str_mv AT alnammimoayad evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT liushengchao evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT ericksenspencers evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT ananievgenee evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT voterandrewf evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT guosong evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT keckjamesl evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT hoffmannfmichael evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT wildmanscotta evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries
AT gitteranthony evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries