Cargando…
Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries
[Image: see text] Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37625010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00912 |
_version_ | 1785113406001381376 |
---|---|
author | Alnammi, Moayad Liu, Shengchao Ericksen, Spencer S. Ananiev, Gene E. Voter, Andrew F. Guo, Song Keck, James L. Hoffmann, F. Michael Wildman, Scott A. Gitter, Anthony |
author_facet | Alnammi, Moayad Liu, Shengchao Ericksen, Spencer S. Ananiev, Gene E. Voter, Andrew F. Guo, Song Keck, James L. Hoffmann, F. Michael Wildman, Scott A. Gitter, Anthony |
author_sort | Alnammi, Moayad |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables training models on known active and inactive compounds and extrapolating to much larger chemical libraries. However, there has been limited experimental validation of these methods in practical applications on large commercially available or synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries. Through a prospective evaluation with the bacterial protein–protein interaction PriA-SSB, we demonstrate that ligand-based virtual screening can identify many active compounds in large commercial libraries. We use cross-validation to compare different types of supervised learning models and select a random forest (RF) classifier as the best model for this target. When predicting the activity of more than 8 million compounds from Aldrich Market Select, the RF substantially outperforms a naïve baseline based on chemical structure similarity. 48% of the RF’s 701 selected compounds are active. The RF model easily scales to score one billion compounds from the synthesize-on-demand Enamine REAL database. We tested 68 chemically diverse top predictions from Enamine REAL and observed 31 hits (46%), including one with an IC(50) value of 1.3 μM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10538940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105389402023-09-29 Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries Alnammi, Moayad Liu, Shengchao Ericksen, Spencer S. Ananiev, Gene E. Voter, Andrew F. Guo, Song Keck, James L. Hoffmann, F. Michael Wildman, Scott A. Gitter, Anthony J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] Traditional small-molecule drug discovery is a time-consuming and costly endeavor. High-throughput chemical screening can only assess a tiny fraction of drug-like chemical space. The strong predictive power of modern machine-learning methods for virtual chemical screening enables training models on known active and inactive compounds and extrapolating to much larger chemical libraries. However, there has been limited experimental validation of these methods in practical applications on large commercially available or synthesize-on-demand chemical libraries. Through a prospective evaluation with the bacterial protein–protein interaction PriA-SSB, we demonstrate that ligand-based virtual screening can identify many active compounds in large commercial libraries. We use cross-validation to compare different types of supervised learning models and select a random forest (RF) classifier as the best model for this target. When predicting the activity of more than 8 million compounds from Aldrich Market Select, the RF substantially outperforms a naïve baseline based on chemical structure similarity. 48% of the RF’s 701 selected compounds are active. The RF model easily scales to score one billion compounds from the synthesize-on-demand Enamine REAL database. We tested 68 chemically diverse top predictions from Enamine REAL and observed 31 hits (46%), including one with an IC(50) value of 1.3 μM. American Chemical Society 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10538940/ /pubmed/37625010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00912 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Alnammi, Moayad Liu, Shengchao Ericksen, Spencer S. Ananiev, Gene E. Voter, Andrew F. Guo, Song Keck, James L. Hoffmann, F. Michael Wildman, Scott A. Gitter, Anthony Evaluating Scalable Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand Chemical Libraries |
title | Evaluating Scalable
Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand
Chemical Libraries |
title_full | Evaluating Scalable
Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand
Chemical Libraries |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Scalable
Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand
Chemical Libraries |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Scalable
Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand
Chemical Libraries |
title_short | Evaluating Scalable
Supervised Learning for Synthesize-on-Demand
Chemical Libraries |
title_sort | evaluating scalable
supervised learning for synthesize-on-demand
chemical libraries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10538940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37625010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00912 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alnammimoayad evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT liushengchao evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT ericksenspencers evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT ananievgenee evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT voterandrewf evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT guosong evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT keckjamesl evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT hoffmannfmichael evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT wildmanscotta evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries AT gitteranthony evaluatingscalablesupervisedlearningforsynthesizeondemandchemicallibraries |