Cargando…

Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?

Diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) constructs multidimensional spectra displaying signal strength as a function of Larmor frequency and of diffusion coefficient from experimental measurements using pulsed field gradient spin or stimulated echoes. Peak positions in the diffusion domain are det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guest, Jamie, Kiraly, Peter, Nilsson, Mathias, Morris, Gareth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Copernicus GmbH 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37905228
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-733-2021
_version_ 1785113574161514496
author Guest, Jamie
Kiraly, Peter
Nilsson, Mathias
Morris, Gareth A.
author_facet Guest, Jamie
Kiraly, Peter
Nilsson, Mathias
Morris, Gareth A.
author_sort Guest, Jamie
collection PubMed
description Diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) constructs multidimensional spectra displaying signal strength as a function of Larmor frequency and of diffusion coefficient from experimental measurements using pulsed field gradient spin or stimulated echoes. Peak positions in the diffusion domain are determined by diffusion coefficients estimated by fitting experimental data to some variant of the Stejskal–Tanner equation, with the peak widths determined by the standard error estimated in the fitting process. The accuracy and reliability of the diffusion domain in DOSY spectra are therefore determined by the uncertainties in the experimental data and thus in part by the signal-to-noise ratio of the experimental spectra measured. Here the Cramér–Rao lower bound, Monte Carlo methods, and experimental data are used to investigate the relationship between signal-to-noise ratio, experimental parameters, and diffusion domain accuracy in 2D DOSY experiments. Experimental results confirm that sources of error other than noise put an upper limit on the improvement in diffusion domain accuracy obtainable by time averaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10539768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Copernicus GmbH
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105397682023-10-30 Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough? Guest, Jamie Kiraly, Peter Nilsson, Mathias Morris, Gareth A. Magn Reson (Gott) Research Article Diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) constructs multidimensional spectra displaying signal strength as a function of Larmor frequency and of diffusion coefficient from experimental measurements using pulsed field gradient spin or stimulated echoes. Peak positions in the diffusion domain are determined by diffusion coefficients estimated by fitting experimental data to some variant of the Stejskal–Tanner equation, with the peak widths determined by the standard error estimated in the fitting process. The accuracy and reliability of the diffusion domain in DOSY spectra are therefore determined by the uncertainties in the experimental data and thus in part by the signal-to-noise ratio of the experimental spectra measured. Here the Cramér–Rao lower bound, Monte Carlo methods, and experimental data are used to investigate the relationship between signal-to-noise ratio, experimental parameters, and diffusion domain accuracy in 2D DOSY experiments. Experimental results confirm that sources of error other than noise put an upper limit on the improvement in diffusion domain accuracy obtainable by time averaging. Copernicus GmbH 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10539768/ /pubmed/37905228 http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-733-2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Jamie Guest et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Guest, Jamie
Kiraly, Peter
Nilsson, Mathias
Morris, Gareth A.
Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
title Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
title_full Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
title_fullStr Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
title_full_unstemmed Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
title_short Signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
title_sort signal-to-noise ratio in diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: how good is good enough?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37905228
http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/mr-2-733-2021
work_keys_str_mv AT guestjamie signaltonoiseratioindiffusionorderedspectroscopyhowgoodisgoodenough
AT kiralypeter signaltonoiseratioindiffusionorderedspectroscopyhowgoodisgoodenough
AT nilssonmathias signaltonoiseratioindiffusionorderedspectroscopyhowgoodisgoodenough
AT morrisgaretha signaltonoiseratioindiffusionorderedspectroscopyhowgoodisgoodenough