Cargando…

Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication

PURPOSE: The motor development of firstborns compared to children having an older sibling in the first two years of life was examined. METHOD: The data of the study come from an ongoing research project with citizen participation, which is investigating the development of motor milestones in the fir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Krombholz, Heinz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20372
_version_ 1785113612089556992
author Krombholz, Heinz
author_facet Krombholz, Heinz
author_sort Krombholz, Heinz
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The motor development of firstborns compared to children having an older sibling in the first two years of life was examined. METHOD: The data of the study come from an ongoing research project with citizen participation, which is investigating the development of motor milestones in the first and second years of life. Parents report online their children's developmental progress using a development calendar. 18 motor skills from birth until children manage walking alone are recorded, 14 relate to gross motor skills and four to hand motor skills. RESULTS: Children with siblings achieved higher values at birth in terms of Apgar-score, height, weight, BMI and parental satisfaction with the health and development of the child compared to firstborns. However, no differences could be found at the ages of 10–12 months and 14 months. Firstborns reached five fine motor and manual dexterity milestones earlier than children with siblings. In contrast, when mastering 13 gross motor milestones, no differences could be found between firstborns and children with siblings. CONCLUSION: Motor development at an early age is considered to be largely genetically controlled, analogous to physical development. However, the faster development of the fine motor skills of the firstborns could be related to the fact that parents interact more intensively with their firstborn than with later born children and – unlike gross motor skills – in fine motor skills not only genetic factors but also learning processes are effective from a very early age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10539937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105399372023-09-30 Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication Krombholz, Heinz Heliyon Research Article PURPOSE: The motor development of firstborns compared to children having an older sibling in the first two years of life was examined. METHOD: The data of the study come from an ongoing research project with citizen participation, which is investigating the development of motor milestones in the first and second years of life. Parents report online their children's developmental progress using a development calendar. 18 motor skills from birth until children manage walking alone are recorded, 14 relate to gross motor skills and four to hand motor skills. RESULTS: Children with siblings achieved higher values at birth in terms of Apgar-score, height, weight, BMI and parental satisfaction with the health and development of the child compared to firstborns. However, no differences could be found at the ages of 10–12 months and 14 months. Firstborns reached five fine motor and manual dexterity milestones earlier than children with siblings. In contrast, when mastering 13 gross motor milestones, no differences could be found between firstborns and children with siblings. CONCLUSION: Motor development at an early age is considered to be largely genetically controlled, analogous to physical development. However, the faster development of the fine motor skills of the firstborns could be related to the fact that parents interact more intensively with their firstborn than with later born children and – unlike gross motor skills – in fine motor skills not only genetic factors but also learning processes are effective from a very early age. Elsevier 2023-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10539937/ /pubmed/37780760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20372 Text en © 2023 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Krombholz, Heinz
Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication
title Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication
title_full Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication
title_fullStr Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication
title_full_unstemmed Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication
title_short Motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – A replication
title_sort motor development of first born compared to later born children in the first two years of life – a replication
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20372
work_keys_str_mv AT krombholzheinz motordevelopmentoffirstborncomparedtolaterbornchildreninthefirsttwoyearsoflifeareplication