Cargando…
De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon?
The introduction of immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibition, has revolutionised the treatment of a range of tumours; however, only a minority of patients respond to these therapies. Understanding the mechanisms by which different immune checkpoint inhibitors work will be critical f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Portland Press Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220244 |
_version_ | 1785113612316049408 |
---|---|
author | Young, Alexander L. Lorimer, Tara Al-Khalidi, Sarwah K. Roberts, Edward W. |
author_facet | Young, Alexander L. Lorimer, Tara Al-Khalidi, Sarwah K. Roberts, Edward W. |
author_sort | Young, Alexander L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibition, has revolutionised the treatment of a range of tumours; however, only a minority of patients respond to these therapies. Understanding the mechanisms by which different immune checkpoint inhibitors work will be critical for both predicting patients who will respond and to developing rational combination therapies to extend these benefits further. The initiation and maintenance of anti-tumour T cell responses is a complicated process split between both the tumour microenvironment and the tumour draining lymph node. As understanding of this process has increased, it has become apparent that immune checkpoint inhibitors can act both within the tumour and in the draining lymph node and that they can target both already activated T cells as well as stimulating the priming of novel T cell clones. Currently, it seems likely that immune checkpoint inhibition acts both within the tumour and in the tumour draining lymph node both reinvigorating existing clones and driving further de novo priming of novel clones. The relative contributions of these sites and targets may depend on the type of model being used and the timeline of the response. Shorter models emphasise the effect of reinvigoration in the absence of recruitment of new clones but studies spanning longer time periods examining T cell clones in patients demonstrate clonal replacement. Ultimately, further work is needed to determine which of the diverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are the fundamental drivers of anti-tumour responses in patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10539938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Portland Press Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105399382023-09-30 De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? Young, Alexander L. Lorimer, Tara Al-Khalidi, Sarwah K. Roberts, Edward W. Essays Biochem Immunology & Inflammation The introduction of immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibition, has revolutionised the treatment of a range of tumours; however, only a minority of patients respond to these therapies. Understanding the mechanisms by which different immune checkpoint inhibitors work will be critical for both predicting patients who will respond and to developing rational combination therapies to extend these benefits further. The initiation and maintenance of anti-tumour T cell responses is a complicated process split between both the tumour microenvironment and the tumour draining lymph node. As understanding of this process has increased, it has become apparent that immune checkpoint inhibitors can act both within the tumour and in the draining lymph node and that they can target both already activated T cells as well as stimulating the priming of novel T cell clones. Currently, it seems likely that immune checkpoint inhibition acts both within the tumour and in the tumour draining lymph node both reinvigorating existing clones and driving further de novo priming of novel clones. The relative contributions of these sites and targets may depend on the type of model being used and the timeline of the response. Shorter models emphasise the effect of reinvigoration in the absence of recruitment of new clones but studies spanning longer time periods examining T cell clones in patients demonstrate clonal replacement. Ultimately, further work is needed to determine which of the diverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors are the fundamental drivers of anti-tumour responses in patients. Portland Press Ltd. 2023-09 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10539938/ /pubmed/37139854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220244 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Open access for this article was enabled by the participation of the University of Glasgow in an all-inclusive Read & Publish agreement with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under a transformative agreement with JISC. |
spellingShingle | Immunology & Inflammation Young, Alexander L. Lorimer, Tara Al-Khalidi, Sarwah K. Roberts, Edward W. De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
title | De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
title_full | De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
title_fullStr | De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
title_full_unstemmed | De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
title_short | De novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
title_sort | de novo priming: driver of immunotherapy responses or epiphenomenon? |
topic | Immunology & Inflammation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10539938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220244 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngalexanderl denovoprimingdriverofimmunotherapyresponsesorepiphenomenon AT lorimertara denovoprimingdriverofimmunotherapyresponsesorepiphenomenon AT alkhalidisarwahk denovoprimingdriverofimmunotherapyresponsesorepiphenomenon AT robertsedwardw denovoprimingdriverofimmunotherapyresponsesorepiphenomenon |