Cargando…

Purpose built catheters for minimally invasive surfactant therapy: Experience from a Canadian tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST), a method of surfactant delivery via a thin catheter during spontaneous breathing, is an increasingly popular alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Recently, purpose-built catheters for MIST received regulatory approval in C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Harthy, Talib, Miller, Michael R, daSilva, Orlando, Bhattacharya, *Soume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781350
http://dx.doi.org/10.29390/001c.77606
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST), a method of surfactant delivery via a thin catheter during spontaneous breathing, is an increasingly popular alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Recently, purpose-built catheters for MIST received regulatory approval in Canada and became available for use. However, procedural success and user experience with such catheters have not been described. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included neonates who received MIST using purpose-built catheters between January 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. Two types of purpose-built catheters were used in this period - SurfCath™ and BLEScath™. Procedural success, number of attempts, and adverse events in neonates receiving MIST via the two catheters were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s tests. User experience was described using an ease-of-use scale. RESULTS: Thirty-seven neonates met eligibility criteria; 22 received MIST via SurfCath™, whereas 15 received MIST via BLEScath™. Success rates were 91% in SurfCath™ and 93% in BLEScath™ (P> 0.994). Failed attempts were lower in SurfCath™ (23%) in comparison to BLEScath™ (33%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.708). Among operators, 90% found SurfCath™ very easy/relatively easy to use compared to 43% of users reflecting the same degree of use with BLEScath™ (P=.021). There was no difference in adverse events. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in Canada to report MIST with purpose-built catheters. Overall, the success rate was equally high with both catheters. Users subjectively reported higher ease of use with SurfCath™. Commercially available purpose-built catheters should facilitate universal adaptation of the MIST method.