Cargando…

Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review

Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fastl, Christina, De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C., Babo Martins, Sara, Sucena Afonso, João, di Bari, Carlotta, Venkateswaran, Narmada, Pires, Sara Monteiro, Mughini-Gras, Lapo, Huntington, Ben, Rushton, Jonathan, Pigott, David, Devleesschauwer, Brecht
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37577944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823001309
_version_ 1785113659896233984
author Fastl, Christina
De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C.
Babo Martins, Sara
Sucena Afonso, João
di Bari, Carlotta
Venkateswaran, Narmada
Pires, Sara Monteiro
Mughini-Gras, Lapo
Huntington, Ben
Rushton, Jonathan
Pigott, David
Devleesschauwer, Brecht
author_facet Fastl, Christina
De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C.
Babo Martins, Sara
Sucena Afonso, João
di Bari, Carlotta
Venkateswaran, Narmada
Pires, Sara Monteiro
Mughini-Gras, Lapo
Huntington, Ben
Rushton, Jonathan
Pigott, David
Devleesschauwer, Brecht
author_sort Fastl, Christina
collection PubMed
description Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria–resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105401792023-09-30 Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review Fastl, Christina De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C. Babo Martins, Sara Sucena Afonso, João di Bari, Carlotta Venkateswaran, Narmada Pires, Sara Monteiro Mughini-Gras, Lapo Huntington, Ben Rushton, Jonathan Pigott, David Devleesschauwer, Brecht Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria–resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on. Cambridge University Press 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10540179/ /pubmed/37577944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823001309 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Fastl, Christina
De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C.
Babo Martins, Sara
Sucena Afonso, João
di Bari, Carlotta
Venkateswaran, Narmada
Pires, Sara Monteiro
Mughini-Gras, Lapo
Huntington, Ben
Rushton, Jonathan
Pigott, David
Devleesschauwer, Brecht
Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
title Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
title_full Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
title_fullStr Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
title_short Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
title_sort animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37577944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823001309
work_keys_str_mv AT fastlchristina animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT decarvalhoferreirahelenac animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT babomartinssara animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT sucenaafonsojoao animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT dibaricarlotta animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT venkateswarannarmada animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT piressaramonteiro animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT mughinigraslapo animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT huntingtonben animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT rushtonjonathan animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT pigottdavid animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview
AT devleesschauwerbrecht animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview