Cargando…
Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review
Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigatin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37577944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823001309 |
_version_ | 1785113659896233984 |
---|---|
author | Fastl, Christina De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C. Babo Martins, Sara Sucena Afonso, João di Bari, Carlotta Venkateswaran, Narmada Pires, Sara Monteiro Mughini-Gras, Lapo Huntington, Ben Rushton, Jonathan Pigott, David Devleesschauwer, Brecht |
author_facet | Fastl, Christina De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C. Babo Martins, Sara Sucena Afonso, João di Bari, Carlotta Venkateswaran, Narmada Pires, Sara Monteiro Mughini-Gras, Lapo Huntington, Ben Rushton, Jonathan Pigott, David Devleesschauwer, Brecht |
author_sort | Fastl, Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria–resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105401792023-09-30 Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review Fastl, Christina De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C. Babo Martins, Sara Sucena Afonso, João di Bari, Carlotta Venkateswaran, Narmada Pires, Sara Monteiro Mughini-Gras, Lapo Huntington, Ben Rushton, Jonathan Pigott, David Devleesschauwer, Brecht Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is among the leading global health challenges of the century. Animals and their products are known contributors to the human AMR burden, but the extent of this contribution is not clear. This systematic literature review aimed to identify studies investigating the direct impact of animal sources, defined as livestock, aquaculture, pets, and animal-based food, on human AMR. We searched four scientific databases and identified 31 relevant publications, including 12 risk assessments, 16 source attribution studies, and three other studies. Most studies were published between 2012 and 2022, and most came from Europe and North America, but we also identified five articles from South and South-East Asia. The studies differed in their methodologies, conceptual approaches (bottom-up, top-down, and complex), definitions of the AMR hazard and outcome, the number and type of sources they addressed, and the outcome measures they reported. The most frequently addressed animal source was chicken, followed by cattle and pigs. Most studies investigated bacteria–resistance combinations. Overall, studies on the direct contribution of animal sources of AMR are rare but increasing. More recent publications tailor their methodologies increasingly towards the AMR hazard as a whole, providing grounds for future research to build on. Cambridge University Press 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10540179/ /pubmed/37577944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823001309 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Fastl, Christina De Carvalho Ferreira, Helena C. Babo Martins, Sara Sucena Afonso, João di Bari, Carlotta Venkateswaran, Narmada Pires, Sara Monteiro Mughini-Gras, Lapo Huntington, Ben Rushton, Jonathan Pigott, David Devleesschauwer, Brecht Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
title | Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
title_full | Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
title_short | Animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
title_sort | animal sources of antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections in humans: a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37577944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823001309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fastlchristina animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT decarvalhoferreirahelenac animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT babomartinssara animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT sucenaafonsojoao animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT dibaricarlotta animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT venkateswarannarmada animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT piressaramonteiro animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT mughinigraslapo animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT huntingtonben animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT rushtonjonathan animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT pigottdavid animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview AT devleesschauwerbrecht animalsourcesofantimicrobialresistantbacterialinfectionsinhumansasystematicreview |