Cargando…

Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of stroke recovery is related to the reorganization of cerebral activity that can be enhanced by rehabilitation therapy. Two well established treatments are Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT) and Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), however, it is unknown whether there is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simis, Marcel, Thibaut, Aurore, Imamura, Marta, Battistella, Linamara Rizzo, Fregni, Felipe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1188806
_version_ 1785113686245900288
author Simis, Marcel
Thibaut, Aurore
Imamura, Marta
Battistella, Linamara Rizzo
Fregni, Felipe
author_facet Simis, Marcel
Thibaut, Aurore
Imamura, Marta
Battistella, Linamara Rizzo
Fregni, Felipe
author_sort Simis, Marcel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The mechanism of stroke recovery is related to the reorganization of cerebral activity that can be enhanced by rehabilitation therapy. Two well established treatments are Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT) and Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), however, it is unknown whether there is a difference in the neuroplastic changes induced by these therapies, and if the modifications are related to motor improvement. Therefore, this study aims to identify neurophysiological biomarkers related to motor improvement of participants with chronic stroke that received RT or CIMT, and to test whether there is a difference in neuronal changes induced by these two therapies. METHODS: This study included participants with chronic stroke that took part in a pilot experiment to compare CIMT vs. RT. Neurophysiological evaluations were performed with electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), pre and post rehabilitation therapy. Motor function was measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb (FMA-UL). RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants with chronic stroke completed the present study [mean age of 58.8 years (SD ± 13.6), mean time since stroke of 18.2 months (SD ± 9.6)]. We found that changes in motor threshold (MT) and motor evoked potential (MEP) in the lesioned hemisphere have a positive and negative correlation with WMFT improvement, respectively. The absolute change in alpha peak in the unlesioned hemisphere and the absolute change of the alpha ratio (unlesioned/lesioned hemisphere) is negatively correlated with WMFT improvement. The decrease of EEG power ratio (increase in the lesioned hemisphere and decrease in the unlesioned hemisphere) for high alpha bandwidths is correlated with better improvement in WMFT. The variable “type of treatment (RT or CIMT)” was not significant in the models. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that distinct treatments (RT and CIMT) have similar neuroplastic mechanisms of recovery. Moreover, motor improvements in participants with chronic stroke are related to decreases of cortical excitability in the lesioned hemisphere measured with TMS. Furthermore, the balance of both EEG power and EEG alpha peak frequency in the lesioned hemisphere is related to motor improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105403072023-09-30 Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke Simis, Marcel Thibaut, Aurore Imamura, Marta Battistella, Linamara Rizzo Fregni, Felipe Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience BACKGROUND: The mechanism of stroke recovery is related to the reorganization of cerebral activity that can be enhanced by rehabilitation therapy. Two well established treatments are Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT) and Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), however, it is unknown whether there is a difference in the neuroplastic changes induced by these therapies, and if the modifications are related to motor improvement. Therefore, this study aims to identify neurophysiological biomarkers related to motor improvement of participants with chronic stroke that received RT or CIMT, and to test whether there is a difference in neuronal changes induced by these two therapies. METHODS: This study included participants with chronic stroke that took part in a pilot experiment to compare CIMT vs. RT. Neurophysiological evaluations were performed with electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), pre and post rehabilitation therapy. Motor function was measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb (FMA-UL). RESULTS: Twenty-seven participants with chronic stroke completed the present study [mean age of 58.8 years (SD ± 13.6), mean time since stroke of 18.2 months (SD ± 9.6)]. We found that changes in motor threshold (MT) and motor evoked potential (MEP) in the lesioned hemisphere have a positive and negative correlation with WMFT improvement, respectively. The absolute change in alpha peak in the unlesioned hemisphere and the absolute change of the alpha ratio (unlesioned/lesioned hemisphere) is negatively correlated with WMFT improvement. The decrease of EEG power ratio (increase in the lesioned hemisphere and decrease in the unlesioned hemisphere) for high alpha bandwidths is correlated with better improvement in WMFT. The variable “type of treatment (RT or CIMT)” was not significant in the models. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that distinct treatments (RT and CIMT) have similar neuroplastic mechanisms of recovery. Moreover, motor improvements in participants with chronic stroke are related to decreases of cortical excitability in the lesioned hemisphere measured with TMS. Furthermore, the balance of both EEG power and EEG alpha peak frequency in the lesioned hemisphere is related to motor improvement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10540307/ /pubmed/37780964 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1188806 Text en Copyright © 2023 Simis, Thibaut, Imamura, Battistella and Fregni. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Simis, Marcel
Thibaut, Aurore
Imamura, Marta
Battistella, Linamara Rizzo
Fregni, Felipe
Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke
title Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke
title_full Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke
title_fullStr Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke
title_full_unstemmed Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke
title_short Neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Robot-Assisted Therapy in participants with stroke
title_sort neurophysiological biomarkers of motor improvement from constraint-induced movement therapy and robot-assisted therapy in participants with stroke
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780964
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1188806
work_keys_str_mv AT simismarcel neurophysiologicalbiomarkersofmotorimprovementfromconstraintinducedmovementtherapyandrobotassistedtherapyinparticipantswithstroke
AT thibautaurore neurophysiologicalbiomarkersofmotorimprovementfromconstraintinducedmovementtherapyandrobotassistedtherapyinparticipantswithstroke
AT imamuramarta neurophysiologicalbiomarkersofmotorimprovementfromconstraintinducedmovementtherapyandrobotassistedtherapyinparticipantswithstroke
AT battistellalinamararizzo neurophysiologicalbiomarkersofmotorimprovementfromconstraintinducedmovementtherapyandrobotassistedtherapyinparticipantswithstroke
AT fregnifelipe neurophysiologicalbiomarkersofmotorimprovementfromconstraintinducedmovementtherapyandrobotassistedtherapyinparticipantswithstroke