Cargando…

A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools

Vector control interventions play a fundamental role in the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. The evaluation of vector control products relies on bioassays, laboratory and semi-field tests using live insects to assess the product’s effectiveness. Bioassay method development requires...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matope, Agnes, Lees, Rosemary S., Spiers, Angus, Foster, Geraldine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04717-w
_version_ 1785113693043818496
author Matope, Agnes
Lees, Rosemary S.
Spiers, Angus
Foster, Geraldine M.
author_facet Matope, Agnes
Lees, Rosemary S.
Spiers, Angus
Foster, Geraldine M.
author_sort Matope, Agnes
collection PubMed
description Vector control interventions play a fundamental role in the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. The evaluation of vector control products relies on bioassays, laboratory and semi-field tests using live insects to assess the product’s effectiveness. Bioassay method development requires a rigorous validation process to ensure that relevant methods are used to capture appropriate entomological endpoints which accurately and precisely describe likely efficacy against disease vectors as well as product characteristics within the manufacturing tolerance ranges for insecticide content specified by the World Health Organization. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for bioassay method validation in vector control. This report presents a framework for bioassay validation that draws on accepted validation processes from the chemical and healthcare fields and which can be applied for evaluating bioassays and semi-field tests in vector control. The validation process has been categorized into four stages: preliminary development; feasibility experiments; internal validation, and external validation. A properly validated method combined with an appropriate experimental design and data analyses that account for both the variability of the method and the product is needed to generate reliable estimates of product efficacy to ensure that at-risk communities have timely access to safe and reliable vector control products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04717-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105403362023-09-30 A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools Matope, Agnes Lees, Rosemary S. Spiers, Angus Foster, Geraldine M. Malar J Case Study Vector control interventions play a fundamental role in the control and elimination of vector-borne diseases. The evaluation of vector control products relies on bioassays, laboratory and semi-field tests using live insects to assess the product’s effectiveness. Bioassay method development requires a rigorous validation process to ensure that relevant methods are used to capture appropriate entomological endpoints which accurately and precisely describe likely efficacy against disease vectors as well as product characteristics within the manufacturing tolerance ranges for insecticide content specified by the World Health Organization. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for bioassay method validation in vector control. This report presents a framework for bioassay validation that draws on accepted validation processes from the chemical and healthcare fields and which can be applied for evaluating bioassays and semi-field tests in vector control. The validation process has been categorized into four stages: preliminary development; feasibility experiments; internal validation, and external validation. A properly validated method combined with an appropriate experimental design and data analyses that account for both the variability of the method and the product is needed to generate reliable estimates of product efficacy to ensure that at-risk communities have timely access to safe and reliable vector control products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04717-w. BioMed Central 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540336/ /pubmed/37770855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04717-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Case Study
Matope, Agnes
Lees, Rosemary S.
Spiers, Angus
Foster, Geraldine M.
A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
title A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
title_full A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
title_fullStr A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
title_full_unstemmed A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
title_short A bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
title_sort bioassay method validation framework for laboratory and semi-field tests used to evaluate vector control tools
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04717-w
work_keys_str_mv AT matopeagnes abioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT leesrosemarys abioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT spiersangus abioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT fostergeraldinem abioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT matopeagnes bioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT leesrosemarys bioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT spiersangus bioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools
AT fostergeraldinem bioassaymethodvalidationframeworkforlaboratoryandsemifieldtestsusedtoevaluatevectorcontroltools