Cargando…
Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate medications, including alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate administered orally and zoledronate, administered intravenously, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of osteoporosis based on evidence that, correctly taken, bisphosphonates can improve bone strength and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06865-1 |
_version_ | 1785113703149993984 |
---|---|
author | Bishop, Simon Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay Paskins, Zoe Corp, Nadia Bastounis, Anastasios Griffin, Jill Gittoes, Neil Leonardi-Bee, Jo Langley, Tessa Sahota, Opinder |
author_facet | Bishop, Simon Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay Paskins, Zoe Corp, Nadia Bastounis, Anastasios Griffin, Jill Gittoes, Neil Leonardi-Bee, Jo Langley, Tessa Sahota, Opinder |
author_sort | Bishop, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate medications, including alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate administered orally and zoledronate, administered intravenously, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of osteoporosis based on evidence that, correctly taken, bisphosphonates can improve bone strength and lead to a reduction in the risk of fragility fractures. However, it is currently unclear how decisions to select between bisphosphonate regimens, including intravenous regimen, are made in practice and how clinicians support patients with different treatments. METHODS: This was an interpretivist qualitative study. 23 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of general practitioners (GPs), secondary care clinicians, specialist experts as well as those providing and leading novel treatments including participants from a community intravenous (IV) zoledronate service. Data analysis was undertaken through a process of iterative categorisation. RESULTS: The results report clinicians varying experiences of making treatment choices, as well as wider aspects of osteoporosis care. Secondary care and specialist clinicians conveyed some confidence in making treatment choices including on selecting IV treatment. This was aided by access to diagnostic testing and medication expertise. In contrast GPs reported a number of challenges in prescribing bisphosphonate medications for osteoporosis and uncertainty about treatment choice. Results also highlight how administering IV zoledronate was seen as an opportunity to engage in broader care practices. CONCLUSION: Approaches to making treatment decisions and supporting patients when prescribing bisphosphonates for osteoporosis vary in practice. This study points to the need to co-ordinate osteoporosis treatment and care across different care providers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06865-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105403772023-09-30 Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study Bishop, Simon Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay Paskins, Zoe Corp, Nadia Bastounis, Anastasios Griffin, Jill Gittoes, Neil Leonardi-Bee, Jo Langley, Tessa Sahota, Opinder BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate medications, including alendronate, ibandronate and risedronate administered orally and zoledronate, administered intravenously, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of osteoporosis based on evidence that, correctly taken, bisphosphonates can improve bone strength and lead to a reduction in the risk of fragility fractures. However, it is currently unclear how decisions to select between bisphosphonate regimens, including intravenous regimen, are made in practice and how clinicians support patients with different treatments. METHODS: This was an interpretivist qualitative study. 23 semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a sample of general practitioners (GPs), secondary care clinicians, specialist experts as well as those providing and leading novel treatments including participants from a community intravenous (IV) zoledronate service. Data analysis was undertaken through a process of iterative categorisation. RESULTS: The results report clinicians varying experiences of making treatment choices, as well as wider aspects of osteoporosis care. Secondary care and specialist clinicians conveyed some confidence in making treatment choices including on selecting IV treatment. This was aided by access to diagnostic testing and medication expertise. In contrast GPs reported a number of challenges in prescribing bisphosphonate medications for osteoporosis and uncertainty about treatment choice. Results also highlight how administering IV zoledronate was seen as an opportunity to engage in broader care practices. CONCLUSION: Approaches to making treatment decisions and supporting patients when prescribing bisphosphonates for osteoporosis vary in practice. This study points to the need to co-ordinate osteoporosis treatment and care across different care providers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06865-1. BioMed Central 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10540377/ /pubmed/37770860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06865-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bishop, Simon Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay Paskins, Zoe Corp, Nadia Bastounis, Anastasios Griffin, Jill Gittoes, Neil Leonardi-Bee, Jo Langley, Tessa Sahota, Opinder Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
title | Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
title_full | Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
title_short | Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
title_sort | clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06865-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bishopsimon cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT narayanasamymelaniejay cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT paskinszoe cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT corpnadia cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT bastounisanastasios cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT griffinjill cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT gittoesneil cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT leonardibeejo cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT langleytessa cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy AT sahotaopinder cliniciansviewsofprescribingoralandintravenousbisphosphonatesforosteoporosisaqualitativestudy |