Cargando…

Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data

BACKGROUND: To evaluate factors associated with better outcomes from optical treatment alone in amblyopic children from 3 up to 7 years. METHODS: Data extracted from two studies with similar protocols, Amblyopic Treatment Studies 5 (n = 152) and 13 (n = 128) from the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernández-Andrés, Rosa, Luque, María Josefa, Serrano, Miguel-Ángel, Scally, Andrew, Barrett, Brendan T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03116-8
_version_ 1785113708189450240
author Hernández-Andrés, Rosa
Luque, María Josefa
Serrano, Miguel-Ángel
Scally, Andrew
Barrett, Brendan T
author_facet Hernández-Andrés, Rosa
Luque, María Josefa
Serrano, Miguel-Ángel
Scally, Andrew
Barrett, Brendan T
author_sort Hernández-Andrés, Rosa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate factors associated with better outcomes from optical treatment alone in amblyopic children from 3 up to 7 years. METHODS: Data extracted from two studies with similar protocols, Amblyopic Treatment Studies 5 (n = 152) and 13 (n = 128) from the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group database, were used to determine by regression analysis the factors associated with improvements in visual acuity in the amblyopic eye, inter-ocular visual acuity difference and stereoacuity. Input variables were aetiology of amblyopia (anisometropic, strabismic and combined-mechanism amblyopia), treatment compliance, visual acuity, interocular visual acuity difference, stereoacuity, tropia size at distance and near, age and refractive error at baseline. RESULTS: Despite the range of clinical factors considered, our models explain only a modest proportion of the variance in optical treatment outcomes. The better predictors of the degree of optical treatment success in amblyopic children are visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, interocular visual acuity difference, stereoacuity, treatment compliance and the amblyopic eye spherical-equivalent refractive error. While the aetiology of the amblyopia does not exert a major influence upon treatment outcome, combined-mechanism amblyopes experience the smallest improvement in visual acuity, tropia and stereoacuity and may need longer optical treatment periods. CONCLUSIONS: While results identify the factors influencing optical treatment outcome in amblyopic children, clinicians will be unable to predict accurately the benefits of optical treatment in individual patients. Whether this is because relevant clinical or non-clinical factors (e.g. nature and volume of daily activities undertaken) influences the outcomes from optical treatment has not yet been identified and remains to be discovered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03116-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105403982023-09-30 Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data Hernández-Andrés, Rosa Luque, María Josefa Serrano, Miguel-Ángel Scally, Andrew Barrett, Brendan T BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate factors associated with better outcomes from optical treatment alone in amblyopic children from 3 up to 7 years. METHODS: Data extracted from two studies with similar protocols, Amblyopic Treatment Studies 5 (n = 152) and 13 (n = 128) from the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group database, were used to determine by regression analysis the factors associated with improvements in visual acuity in the amblyopic eye, inter-ocular visual acuity difference and stereoacuity. Input variables were aetiology of amblyopia (anisometropic, strabismic and combined-mechanism amblyopia), treatment compliance, visual acuity, interocular visual acuity difference, stereoacuity, tropia size at distance and near, age and refractive error at baseline. RESULTS: Despite the range of clinical factors considered, our models explain only a modest proportion of the variance in optical treatment outcomes. The better predictors of the degree of optical treatment success in amblyopic children are visual acuity of the amblyopic eye, interocular visual acuity difference, stereoacuity, treatment compliance and the amblyopic eye spherical-equivalent refractive error. While the aetiology of the amblyopia does not exert a major influence upon treatment outcome, combined-mechanism amblyopes experience the smallest improvement in visual acuity, tropia and stereoacuity and may need longer optical treatment periods. CONCLUSIONS: While results identify the factors influencing optical treatment outcome in amblyopic children, clinicians will be unable to predict accurately the benefits of optical treatment in individual patients. Whether this is because relevant clinical or non-clinical factors (e.g. nature and volume of daily activities undertaken) influences the outcomes from optical treatment has not yet been identified and remains to be discovered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03116-8. BioMed Central 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540398/ /pubmed/37770832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03116-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hernández-Andrés, Rosa
Luque, María Josefa
Serrano, Miguel-Ángel
Scally, Andrew
Barrett, Brendan T
Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data
title Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data
title_full Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data
title_fullStr Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data
title_short Factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of PEDIG data
title_sort factors affecting the benefit of glasses alone in treating childhood amblyopia: an analysis of pedig data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37770832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03116-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezandresrosa factorsaffectingthebenefitofglassesaloneintreatingchildhoodamblyopiaananalysisofpedigdata
AT luquemariajosefa factorsaffectingthebenefitofglassesaloneintreatingchildhoodamblyopiaananalysisofpedigdata
AT serranomiguelangel factorsaffectingthebenefitofglassesaloneintreatingchildhoodamblyopiaananalysisofpedigdata
AT scallyandrew factorsaffectingthebenefitofglassesaloneintreatingchildhoodamblyopiaananalysisofpedigdata
AT barrettbrendant factorsaffectingthebenefitofglassesaloneintreatingchildhoodamblyopiaananalysisofpedigdata