Cargando…
Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
Due to its high printing resolution and ability to print multiple materials simultaneously, inkjet technology has found wide application in medicine. However, the biological safety of 3D-printed objects is not always guaranteed due to residues of uncured resins or support materials and must therefor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y |
_version_ | 1785113715813646336 |
---|---|
author | Schneider, Karl H. Oberoi, Gunpreet Unger, Ewald Janjic, Klara Rohringer, Sabrina Heber, Stefan Agis, Hermann Schedle, Andreas Kiss, Herbert Podesser, Bruno K. Windhager, Reinhard Toegel, Stefan Moscato, Francesco |
author_facet | Schneider, Karl H. Oberoi, Gunpreet Unger, Ewald Janjic, Klara Rohringer, Sabrina Heber, Stefan Agis, Hermann Schedle, Andreas Kiss, Herbert Podesser, Bruno K. Windhager, Reinhard Toegel, Stefan Moscato, Francesco |
author_sort | Schneider, Karl H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to its high printing resolution and ability to print multiple materials simultaneously, inkjet technology has found wide application in medicine. However, the biological safety of 3D-printed objects is not always guaranteed due to residues of uncured resins or support materials and must therefore be verified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of standard assessment methods for determining the quality and properties of polyjet-printed scaffolds in terms of their dimensional accuracy, surface topography, and cytotoxic potential. Standardized 3D-printed samples were produced in two printing orientations (horizontal or vertical). Printing accuracy and surface roughness was assessed by size measurements, VR-5200 3D optical profilometer dimensional analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. Cytotoxicity tests were performed with a representative cell line (L929) in a comparative laboratory study. Individual experiments were performed with primary cells from clinically relevant tissues and with a Toxdent cytotoxicity assay. Dimensional measurements of printed discs indicated high print accuracy and reproducibility. Print accuracy was highest when specimens were printed in horizontal direction. In all cytotoxicity tests, the estimated mean cell viability was well above 70% (p < 0.0001) regardless of material and printing direction, confirming the low cytotoxicity of the final 3D-printed objects. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105404252023-09-30 Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity Schneider, Karl H. Oberoi, Gunpreet Unger, Ewald Janjic, Klara Rohringer, Sabrina Heber, Stefan Agis, Hermann Schedle, Andreas Kiss, Herbert Podesser, Bruno K. Windhager, Reinhard Toegel, Stefan Moscato, Francesco 3D Print Med Research Due to its high printing resolution and ability to print multiple materials simultaneously, inkjet technology has found wide application in medicine. However, the biological safety of 3D-printed objects is not always guaranteed due to residues of uncured resins or support materials and must therefore be verified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of standard assessment methods for determining the quality and properties of polyjet-printed scaffolds in terms of their dimensional accuracy, surface topography, and cytotoxic potential. Standardized 3D-printed samples were produced in two printing orientations (horizontal or vertical). Printing accuracy and surface roughness was assessed by size measurements, VR-5200 3D optical profilometer dimensional analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. Cytotoxicity tests were performed with a representative cell line (L929) in a comparative laboratory study. Individual experiments were performed with primary cells from clinically relevant tissues and with a Toxdent cytotoxicity assay. Dimensional measurements of printed discs indicated high print accuracy and reproducibility. Print accuracy was highest when specimens were printed in horizontal direction. In all cytotoxicity tests, the estimated mean cell viability was well above 70% (p < 0.0001) regardless of material and printing direction, confirming the low cytotoxicity of the final 3D-printed objects. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540425/ /pubmed/37768399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Schneider, Karl H. Oberoi, Gunpreet Unger, Ewald Janjic, Klara Rohringer, Sabrina Heber, Stefan Agis, Hermann Schedle, Andreas Kiss, Herbert Podesser, Bruno K. Windhager, Reinhard Toegel, Stefan Moscato, Francesco Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
title | Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
title_full | Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
title_fullStr | Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
title_short | Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
title_sort | medical 3d printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schneiderkarlh medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT oberoigunpreet medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT ungerewald medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT janjicklara medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT rohringersabrina medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT heberstefan medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT agishermann medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT schedleandreas medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT kissherbert medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT podesserbrunok medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT windhagerreinhard medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT toegelstefan medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity AT moscatofrancesco medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity |