Cargando…

Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity

Due to its high printing resolution and ability to print multiple materials simultaneously, inkjet technology has found wide application in medicine. However, the biological safety of 3D-printed objects is not always guaranteed due to residues of uncured resins or support materials and must therefor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Karl H., Oberoi, Gunpreet, Unger, Ewald, Janjic, Klara, Rohringer, Sabrina, Heber, Stefan, Agis, Hermann, Schedle, Andreas, Kiss, Herbert, Podesser, Bruno K., Windhager, Reinhard, Toegel, Stefan, Moscato, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y
_version_ 1785113715813646336
author Schneider, Karl H.
Oberoi, Gunpreet
Unger, Ewald
Janjic, Klara
Rohringer, Sabrina
Heber, Stefan
Agis, Hermann
Schedle, Andreas
Kiss, Herbert
Podesser, Bruno K.
Windhager, Reinhard
Toegel, Stefan
Moscato, Francesco
author_facet Schneider, Karl H.
Oberoi, Gunpreet
Unger, Ewald
Janjic, Klara
Rohringer, Sabrina
Heber, Stefan
Agis, Hermann
Schedle, Andreas
Kiss, Herbert
Podesser, Bruno K.
Windhager, Reinhard
Toegel, Stefan
Moscato, Francesco
author_sort Schneider, Karl H.
collection PubMed
description Due to its high printing resolution and ability to print multiple materials simultaneously, inkjet technology has found wide application in medicine. However, the biological safety of 3D-printed objects is not always guaranteed due to residues of uncured resins or support materials and must therefore be verified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of standard assessment methods for determining the quality and properties of polyjet-printed scaffolds in terms of their dimensional accuracy, surface topography, and cytotoxic potential. Standardized 3D-printed samples were produced in two printing orientations (horizontal or vertical). Printing accuracy and surface roughness was assessed by size measurements, VR-5200 3D optical profilometer dimensional analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. Cytotoxicity tests were performed with a representative cell line (L929) in a comparative laboratory study. Individual experiments were performed with primary cells from clinically relevant tissues and with a Toxdent cytotoxicity assay. Dimensional measurements of printed discs indicated high print accuracy and reproducibility. Print accuracy was highest when specimens were printed in horizontal direction. In all cytotoxicity tests, the estimated mean cell viability was well above 70% (p < 0.0001) regardless of material and printing direction, confirming the low cytotoxicity of the final 3D-printed objects. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105404252023-09-30 Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity Schneider, Karl H. Oberoi, Gunpreet Unger, Ewald Janjic, Klara Rohringer, Sabrina Heber, Stefan Agis, Hermann Schedle, Andreas Kiss, Herbert Podesser, Bruno K. Windhager, Reinhard Toegel, Stefan Moscato, Francesco 3D Print Med Research Due to its high printing resolution and ability to print multiple materials simultaneously, inkjet technology has found wide application in medicine. However, the biological safety of 3D-printed objects is not always guaranteed due to residues of uncured resins or support materials and must therefore be verified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of standard assessment methods for determining the quality and properties of polyjet-printed scaffolds in terms of their dimensional accuracy, surface topography, and cytotoxic potential. Standardized 3D-printed samples were produced in two printing orientations (horizontal or vertical). Printing accuracy and surface roughness was assessed by size measurements, VR-5200 3D optical profilometer dimensional analysis, and scanning electron microscopy. Cytotoxicity tests were performed with a representative cell line (L929) in a comparative laboratory study. Individual experiments were performed with primary cells from clinically relevant tissues and with a Toxdent cytotoxicity assay. Dimensional measurements of printed discs indicated high print accuracy and reproducibility. Print accuracy was highest when specimens were printed in horizontal direction. In all cytotoxicity tests, the estimated mean cell viability was well above 70% (p < 0.0001) regardless of material and printing direction, confirming the low cytotoxicity of the final 3D-printed objects. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540425/ /pubmed/37768399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schneider, Karl H.
Oberoi, Gunpreet
Unger, Ewald
Janjic, Klara
Rohringer, Sabrina
Heber, Stefan
Agis, Hermann
Schedle, Andreas
Kiss, Herbert
Podesser, Bruno K.
Windhager, Reinhard
Toegel, Stefan
Moscato, Francesco
Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
title Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
title_full Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
title_fullStr Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
title_full_unstemmed Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
title_short Medical 3D printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
title_sort medical 3d printing with polyjet technology: effect of material type and printing orientation on printability, surface structure and cytotoxicity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00190-y
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderkarlh medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT oberoigunpreet medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT ungerewald medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT janjicklara medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT rohringersabrina medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT heberstefan medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT agishermann medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT schedleandreas medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT kissherbert medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT podesserbrunok medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT windhagerreinhard medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT toegelstefan medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity
AT moscatofrancesco medical3dprintingwithpolyjettechnologyeffectofmaterialtypeandprintingorientationonprintabilitysurfacestructureandcytotoxicity