Cargando…

Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods

Most diagnostic studies exclude missing values and inconclusive results from the analysis or apply simple methods resulting in biased accuracy estimates. This may be due to the lack of availability or awareness of appropriate methods. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of strategies to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stahlmann, Katharina, Reitsma, Johannes B, Zapf, Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802231192954
_version_ 1785113731713204224
author Stahlmann, Katharina
Reitsma, Johannes B
Zapf, Antonia
author_facet Stahlmann, Katharina
Reitsma, Johannes B
Zapf, Antonia
author_sort Stahlmann, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Most diagnostic studies exclude missing values and inconclusive results from the analysis or apply simple methods resulting in biased accuracy estimates. This may be due to the lack of availability or awareness of appropriate methods. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of strategies to handle missing values and inconclusive results in the reference standard or index test in diagnostic accuracy studies. Conducting a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, we could identify many articles proposing methods for addressing missing values in the reference standard. There are also several articles describing methods regarding missing values or inconclusive results in the index test. The latter encompass imputation, frequentist and Bayesian likelihood, model-based, and latent class methods. While methods for missing values in the reference standard are regularly applied in practice, this is not true for methods addressing missing values and inconclusive results in the index test. Our comprehensive overview and description of available methods may raise further awareness of these methods and will enhance their application. Future research is needed to compare the performance of these methods under different conditions to give valid and robust recommendations for their usage in various diagnostic accuracy research scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105404942023-09-30 Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods Stahlmann, Katharina Reitsma, Johannes B Zapf, Antonia Stat Methods Med Res Review Articles Most diagnostic studies exclude missing values and inconclusive results from the analysis or apply simple methods resulting in biased accuracy estimates. This may be due to the lack of availability or awareness of appropriate methods. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of strategies to handle missing values and inconclusive results in the reference standard or index test in diagnostic accuracy studies. Conducting a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, we could identify many articles proposing methods for addressing missing values in the reference standard. There are also several articles describing methods regarding missing values or inconclusive results in the index test. The latter encompass imputation, frequentist and Bayesian likelihood, model-based, and latent class methods. While methods for missing values in the reference standard are regularly applied in practice, this is not true for methods addressing missing values and inconclusive results in the index test. Our comprehensive overview and description of available methods may raise further awareness of these methods and will enhance their application. Future research is needed to compare the performance of these methods under different conditions to give valid and robust recommendations for their usage in various diagnostic accuracy research scenarios. SAGE Publications 2023-08-09 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10540494/ /pubmed/37559474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802231192954 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Stahlmann, Katharina
Reitsma, Johannes B
Zapf, Antonia
Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
title Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
title_full Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
title_fullStr Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
title_full_unstemmed Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
title_short Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
title_sort missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – a scoping review of methods
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802231192954
work_keys_str_mv AT stahlmannkatharina missingvaluesandinconclusiveresultsindiagnosticstudiesascopingreviewofmethods
AT reitsmajohannesb missingvaluesandinconclusiveresultsindiagnosticstudiesascopingreviewofmethods
AT zapfantonia missingvaluesandinconclusiveresultsindiagnosticstudiesascopingreviewofmethods