Cargando…
Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods
Most diagnostic studies exclude missing values and inconclusive results from the analysis or apply simple methods resulting in biased accuracy estimates. This may be due to the lack of availability or awareness of appropriate methods. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of strategies to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802231192954 |
_version_ | 1785113731713204224 |
---|---|
author | Stahlmann, Katharina Reitsma, Johannes B Zapf, Antonia |
author_facet | Stahlmann, Katharina Reitsma, Johannes B Zapf, Antonia |
author_sort | Stahlmann, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most diagnostic studies exclude missing values and inconclusive results from the analysis or apply simple methods resulting in biased accuracy estimates. This may be due to the lack of availability or awareness of appropriate methods. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of strategies to handle missing values and inconclusive results in the reference standard or index test in diagnostic accuracy studies. Conducting a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, we could identify many articles proposing methods for addressing missing values in the reference standard. There are also several articles describing methods regarding missing values or inconclusive results in the index test. The latter encompass imputation, frequentist and Bayesian likelihood, model-based, and latent class methods. While methods for missing values in the reference standard are regularly applied in practice, this is not true for methods addressing missing values and inconclusive results in the index test. Our comprehensive overview and description of available methods may raise further awareness of these methods and will enhance their application. Future research is needed to compare the performance of these methods under different conditions to give valid and robust recommendations for their usage in various diagnostic accuracy research scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105404942023-09-30 Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods Stahlmann, Katharina Reitsma, Johannes B Zapf, Antonia Stat Methods Med Res Review Articles Most diagnostic studies exclude missing values and inconclusive results from the analysis or apply simple methods resulting in biased accuracy estimates. This may be due to the lack of availability or awareness of appropriate methods. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of strategies to handle missing values and inconclusive results in the reference standard or index test in diagnostic accuracy studies. Conducting a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, we could identify many articles proposing methods for addressing missing values in the reference standard. There are also several articles describing methods regarding missing values or inconclusive results in the index test. The latter encompass imputation, frequentist and Bayesian likelihood, model-based, and latent class methods. While methods for missing values in the reference standard are regularly applied in practice, this is not true for methods addressing missing values and inconclusive results in the index test. Our comprehensive overview and description of available methods may raise further awareness of these methods and will enhance their application. Future research is needed to compare the performance of these methods under different conditions to give valid and robust recommendations for their usage in various diagnostic accuracy research scenarios. SAGE Publications 2023-08-09 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10540494/ /pubmed/37559474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802231192954 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Stahlmann, Katharina Reitsma, Johannes B Zapf, Antonia Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods |
title | Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods |
title_full | Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods |
title_fullStr | Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods |
title_short | Missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – A scoping review of methods |
title_sort | missing values and inconclusive results in diagnostic studies – a scoping review of methods |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09622802231192954 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stahlmannkatharina missingvaluesandinconclusiveresultsindiagnosticstudiesascopingreviewofmethods AT reitsmajohannesb missingvaluesandinconclusiveresultsindiagnosticstudiesascopingreviewofmethods AT zapfantonia missingvaluesandinconclusiveresultsindiagnosticstudiesascopingreviewofmethods |