Cargando…

Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation

OBJECTIVE: As part of COVID-19 pandemic control efforts, digital proof-of-vaccination credentials were launched in Canada in 2021–2022 following widespread vaccine availability. Given the controversy over proof-of-vaccination credentials—often colloquially called vaccine or immunization “passports”—...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greyson, Devon, Pringle, Wendy, Wilson, Kumanan, Bettinger, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231203924
_version_ 1785113739961303040
author Greyson, Devon
Pringle, Wendy
Wilson, Kumanan
Bettinger, Julie A.
author_facet Greyson, Devon
Pringle, Wendy
Wilson, Kumanan
Bettinger, Julie A.
author_sort Greyson, Devon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: As part of COVID-19 pandemic control efforts, digital proof-of-vaccination credentials were launched in Canada in 2021–2022 following widespread vaccine availability. Given the controversy over proof-of-vaccination credentials—often colloquially called vaccine or immunization “passports”—it is imperative to document successes, shortcomings, and recommendations for any future uses. METHODS: This expert consultation applied inductive qualitative content analysis to online video interviews with key informants whose expertise ranged from ethics to public health to computer science to identify what we can learn from this experience with proof-of-vaccination credentials, and what decision-makers must keep in mind for possible future use of such technologies. RESULTS: There remains a lack of consensus regarding appropriate language and scope for digital proof-of-vaccination technologies, the respective roles of the technology sector versus government in design and implementation, and parameters for future use. However, experts agree on many recommendations, including the importance of clear communication, evidence-based rationale for the use of proof-of-vaccination credentials, multidisciplinary consultation including academic experts and the public, and the importance of pan-Canadian standards for accessibility and interoperability. Identified risks of use that emerged, and should be minimized in the future, include risks of coercion and backlash; threats to access, equity and privacy; and impacts such as costs of the technology and workload burden of enforcement and fraud detection. CONCLUSIONS: There is much to learn from this first major use of digital proof-of-vaccination credentials. A full scientific review of the impacts on health and equity should be combined with expert recommendations to create pan-Canadian guidelines for the future use of digital proof-of-vaccination solutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105405782023-09-30 Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation Greyson, Devon Pringle, Wendy Wilson, Kumanan Bettinger, Julie A. Digit Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: As part of COVID-19 pandemic control efforts, digital proof-of-vaccination credentials were launched in Canada in 2021–2022 following widespread vaccine availability. Given the controversy over proof-of-vaccination credentials—often colloquially called vaccine or immunization “passports”—it is imperative to document successes, shortcomings, and recommendations for any future uses. METHODS: This expert consultation applied inductive qualitative content analysis to online video interviews with key informants whose expertise ranged from ethics to public health to computer science to identify what we can learn from this experience with proof-of-vaccination credentials, and what decision-makers must keep in mind for possible future use of such technologies. RESULTS: There remains a lack of consensus regarding appropriate language and scope for digital proof-of-vaccination technologies, the respective roles of the technology sector versus government in design and implementation, and parameters for future use. However, experts agree on many recommendations, including the importance of clear communication, evidence-based rationale for the use of proof-of-vaccination credentials, multidisciplinary consultation including academic experts and the public, and the importance of pan-Canadian standards for accessibility and interoperability. Identified risks of use that emerged, and should be minimized in the future, include risks of coercion and backlash; threats to access, equity and privacy; and impacts such as costs of the technology and workload burden of enforcement and fraud detection. CONCLUSIONS: There is much to learn from this first major use of digital proof-of-vaccination credentials. A full scientific review of the impacts on health and equity should be combined with expert recommendations to create pan-Canadian guidelines for the future use of digital proof-of-vaccination solutions. SAGE Publications 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540578/ /pubmed/37780068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231203924 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Greyson, Devon
Pringle, Wendy
Wilson, Kumanan
Bettinger, Julie A.
Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation
title Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation
title_full Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation
title_fullStr Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation
title_full_unstemmed Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation
title_short Proof-of-vaccination credentials for COVID-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: Results of an expert consultation
title_sort proof-of-vaccination credentials for covid-19 and considerations for future use of digital proof-of-immunization technologies: results of an expert consultation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231203924
work_keys_str_mv AT greysondevon proofofvaccinationcredentialsforcovid19andconsiderationsforfutureuseofdigitalproofofimmunizationtechnologiesresultsofanexpertconsultation
AT pringlewendy proofofvaccinationcredentialsforcovid19andconsiderationsforfutureuseofdigitalproofofimmunizationtechnologiesresultsofanexpertconsultation
AT wilsonkumanan proofofvaccinationcredentialsforcovid19andconsiderationsforfutureuseofdigitalproofofimmunizationtechnologiesresultsofanexpertconsultation
AT bettingerjuliea proofofvaccinationcredentialsforcovid19andconsiderationsforfutureuseofdigitalproofofimmunizationtechnologiesresultsofanexpertconsultation