Cargando…

Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions

BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. PURPOSE: To determine if capsuloligamentous laxity affects failure (recurrent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boden, Stephanie A., Charles, Shaquille, Hughes, Jonathan D., Miller, Liane, Rodosky, Mark, Popchak, Adam, Musahl, Volker, Lesniak, Bryson P., Lin, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231200231
_version_ 1785113742942404608
author Boden, Stephanie A.
Charles, Shaquille
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Miller, Liane
Rodosky, Mark
Popchak, Adam
Musahl, Volker
Lesniak, Bryson P.
Lin, Albert
author_facet Boden, Stephanie A.
Charles, Shaquille
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Miller, Liane
Rodosky, Mark
Popchak, Adam
Musahl, Volker
Lesniak, Bryson P.
Lin, Albert
author_sort Boden, Stephanie A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. PURPOSE: To determine if capsuloligamentous laxity affects failure (recurrent dislocation, subluxation, and/or perceived instability symptoms) after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with near-track lesions (ie, those with smaller distance to dislocation [DTD]). STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at a single institution between 2007 and 2019 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Patients with glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track lesions, concomitant remplissage, or rotator cuff tear were excluded. Capsuloligamentous laxity, or hyperlaxity, was defined as external rotation >85° with the arm at the side and/or grade ≥2 in at least 2 planes with the shoulder at 90° of abduction. Near-track lesions were defined as those with a DTD <10 mm. RESULTS: Included were 173 patients (mean age, 20.5 years; mean DTD, 16.2 mm), of whom 16.8% sustained a recurrent dislocation and 6.4% had recurrent subluxations (defined as any subjective complaint of recurrent instability without frank dislocation), for an overall recurrent instability rate of 23.1%. The rate of revision stabilization was 15.6%. The mean time to follow-up was 7.4 years. Independent predictors of recurrent instability were younger age (P = .001), smaller DTD (P = .021), >1 preoperative instability episode (P < .001), and the presence of hyperlaxity during examination under anesthesia (P = .013). Among patients with near-track lesions, those with hyperlaxity had a recurrent instability rate almost double that of patients without hyperlaxity (odds ratio, 34.1; P = .04). The increased rate of failure and recurrent dislocation in the near-track hyperlaxity cohort remained elevated, even in patients with no bone loss. CONCLUSION: Capsuloligamentous shoulder laxity was a significant independent risk factor for failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair without remplissage and was more predictive of failure in patients with versus without near-track lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105405902023-09-30 Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions Boden, Stephanie A. Charles, Shaquille Hughes, Jonathan D. Miller, Liane Rodosky, Mark Popchak, Adam Musahl, Volker Lesniak, Bryson P. Lin, Albert Orthop J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. PURPOSE: To determine if capsuloligamentous laxity affects failure (recurrent dislocation, subluxation, and/or perceived instability symptoms) after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with near-track lesions (ie, those with smaller distance to dislocation [DTD]). STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at a single institution between 2007 and 2019 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Patients with glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track lesions, concomitant remplissage, or rotator cuff tear were excluded. Capsuloligamentous laxity, or hyperlaxity, was defined as external rotation >85° with the arm at the side and/or grade ≥2 in at least 2 planes with the shoulder at 90° of abduction. Near-track lesions were defined as those with a DTD <10 mm. RESULTS: Included were 173 patients (mean age, 20.5 years; mean DTD, 16.2 mm), of whom 16.8% sustained a recurrent dislocation and 6.4% had recurrent subluxations (defined as any subjective complaint of recurrent instability without frank dislocation), for an overall recurrent instability rate of 23.1%. The rate of revision stabilization was 15.6%. The mean time to follow-up was 7.4 years. Independent predictors of recurrent instability were younger age (P = .001), smaller DTD (P = .021), >1 preoperative instability episode (P < .001), and the presence of hyperlaxity during examination under anesthesia (P = .013). Among patients with near-track lesions, those with hyperlaxity had a recurrent instability rate almost double that of patients without hyperlaxity (odds ratio, 34.1; P = .04). The increased rate of failure and recurrent dislocation in the near-track hyperlaxity cohort remained elevated, even in patients with no bone loss. CONCLUSION: Capsuloligamentous shoulder laxity was a significant independent risk factor for failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair without remplissage and was more predictive of failure in patients with versus without near-track lesions. SAGE Publications 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540590/ /pubmed/37781639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231200231 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Boden, Stephanie A.
Charles, Shaquille
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Miller, Liane
Rodosky, Mark
Popchak, Adam
Musahl, Volker
Lesniak, Bryson P.
Lin, Albert
Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
title Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
title_full Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
title_fullStr Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
title_short Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
title_sort recurrent instability after arthroscopic bankart repair in patients with hyperlaxity and near-track lesions
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231200231
work_keys_str_mv AT bodenstephaniea recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT charlesshaquille recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT hughesjonathand recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT millerliane recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT rodoskymark recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT popchakadam recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT musahlvolker recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT lesniakbrysonp recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions
AT linalbert recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions