Cargando…
Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions
BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. PURPOSE: To determine if capsuloligamentous laxity affects failure (recurrent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231200231 |
_version_ | 1785113742942404608 |
---|---|
author | Boden, Stephanie A. Charles, Shaquille Hughes, Jonathan D. Miller, Liane Rodosky, Mark Popchak, Adam Musahl, Volker Lesniak, Bryson P. Lin, Albert |
author_facet | Boden, Stephanie A. Charles, Shaquille Hughes, Jonathan D. Miller, Liane Rodosky, Mark Popchak, Adam Musahl, Volker Lesniak, Bryson P. Lin, Albert |
author_sort | Boden, Stephanie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. PURPOSE: To determine if capsuloligamentous laxity affects failure (recurrent dislocation, subluxation, and/or perceived instability symptoms) after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with near-track lesions (ie, those with smaller distance to dislocation [DTD]). STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at a single institution between 2007 and 2019 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Patients with glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track lesions, concomitant remplissage, or rotator cuff tear were excluded. Capsuloligamentous laxity, or hyperlaxity, was defined as external rotation >85° with the arm at the side and/or grade ≥2 in at least 2 planes with the shoulder at 90° of abduction. Near-track lesions were defined as those with a DTD <10 mm. RESULTS: Included were 173 patients (mean age, 20.5 years; mean DTD, 16.2 mm), of whom 16.8% sustained a recurrent dislocation and 6.4% had recurrent subluxations (defined as any subjective complaint of recurrent instability without frank dislocation), for an overall recurrent instability rate of 23.1%. The rate of revision stabilization was 15.6%. The mean time to follow-up was 7.4 years. Independent predictors of recurrent instability were younger age (P = .001), smaller DTD (P = .021), >1 preoperative instability episode (P < .001), and the presence of hyperlaxity during examination under anesthesia (P = .013). Among patients with near-track lesions, those with hyperlaxity had a recurrent instability rate almost double that of patients without hyperlaxity (odds ratio, 34.1; P = .04). The increased rate of failure and recurrent dislocation in the near-track hyperlaxity cohort remained elevated, even in patients with no bone loss. CONCLUSION: Capsuloligamentous shoulder laxity was a significant independent risk factor for failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair without remplissage and was more predictive of failure in patients with versus without near-track lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105405902023-09-30 Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions Boden, Stephanie A. Charles, Shaquille Hughes, Jonathan D. Miller, Liane Rodosky, Mark Popchak, Adam Musahl, Volker Lesniak, Bryson P. Lin, Albert Orthop J Sports Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. PURPOSE: To determine if capsuloligamentous laxity affects failure (recurrent dislocation, subluxation, and/or perceived instability symptoms) after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with near-track lesions (ie, those with smaller distance to dislocation [DTD]). STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at a single institution between 2007 and 2019 and who had at least 2 years of follow-up data. Patients with glenoid bone loss >20%, off-track lesions, concomitant remplissage, or rotator cuff tear were excluded. Capsuloligamentous laxity, or hyperlaxity, was defined as external rotation >85° with the arm at the side and/or grade ≥2 in at least 2 planes with the shoulder at 90° of abduction. Near-track lesions were defined as those with a DTD <10 mm. RESULTS: Included were 173 patients (mean age, 20.5 years; mean DTD, 16.2 mm), of whom 16.8% sustained a recurrent dislocation and 6.4% had recurrent subluxations (defined as any subjective complaint of recurrent instability without frank dislocation), for an overall recurrent instability rate of 23.1%. The rate of revision stabilization was 15.6%. The mean time to follow-up was 7.4 years. Independent predictors of recurrent instability were younger age (P = .001), smaller DTD (P = .021), >1 preoperative instability episode (P < .001), and the presence of hyperlaxity during examination under anesthesia (P = .013). Among patients with near-track lesions, those with hyperlaxity had a recurrent instability rate almost double that of patients without hyperlaxity (odds ratio, 34.1; P = .04). The increased rate of failure and recurrent dislocation in the near-track hyperlaxity cohort remained elevated, even in patients with no bone loss. CONCLUSION: Capsuloligamentous shoulder laxity was a significant independent risk factor for failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair without remplissage and was more predictive of failure in patients with versus without near-track lesions. SAGE Publications 2023-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10540590/ /pubmed/37781639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231200231 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Boden, Stephanie A. Charles, Shaquille Hughes, Jonathan D. Miller, Liane Rodosky, Mark Popchak, Adam Musahl, Volker Lesniak, Bryson P. Lin, Albert Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions |
title | Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions |
title_full | Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions |
title_fullStr | Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions |
title_short | Recurrent Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients With Hyperlaxity and Near-Track Lesions |
title_sort | recurrent instability after arthroscopic bankart repair in patients with hyperlaxity and near-track lesions |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231200231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bodenstephaniea recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT charlesshaquille recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT hughesjonathand recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT millerliane recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT rodoskymark recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT popchakadam recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT musahlvolker recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT lesniakbrysonp recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions AT linalbert recurrentinstabilityafterarthroscopicbankartrepairinpatientswithhyperlaxityandneartracklesions |