Cargando…

Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with a validated patient questionnaire following topography-guided LASIK (TG-LASIK). METHODS: Patients undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software were prospectively enrolled to receive an adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rush, Sloan W, Pickett, Cory J, Wilson, Braden J, Rush, Ryan B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781320
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S429991
_version_ 1785113765272879104
author Rush, Sloan W
Pickett, Cory J
Wilson, Braden J
Rush, Ryan B
author_facet Rush, Sloan W
Pickett, Cory J
Wilson, Braden J
Rush, Ryan B
author_sort Rush, Sloan W
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with a validated patient questionnaire following topography-guided LASIK (TG-LASIK). METHODS: Patients undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software were prospectively enrolled to receive an adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL) questionnaire before and 26-weeks after treatment. The main study outcome was the change in the Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the PROWL questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent treatment and completed the modified PROWL questionnaire before and 26-weeks after TG-LASIK. The Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the modified PROWL questionnaire improved from 4.07 (3.87–4.26) to 5.00 (4.81–5.19) after the TG-LASIK treatment (p < 0.0001). The study population’s binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/16, 20/12.5, and 20/10 or better in 100%, 87.0%, and 15.2% at 26 weeks post TG-LASIK, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction as assessed with the modified PROWL questionnaire is very high after undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software. Patient-reported outcomes add another dimension when assessing treatment efficacy beyond change in visual acuity and corneal architecture, and specialists may consider incorporating such assessments into the consenting process and patient education at large.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10540697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105406972023-09-30 Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes Rush, Sloan W Pickett, Cory J Wilson, Braden J Rush, Ryan B Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with a validated patient questionnaire following topography-guided LASIK (TG-LASIK). METHODS: Patients undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software were prospectively enrolled to receive an adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL) questionnaire before and 26-weeks after treatment. The main study outcome was the change in the Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the PROWL questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent treatment and completed the modified PROWL questionnaire before and 26-weeks after TG-LASIK. The Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the modified PROWL questionnaire improved from 4.07 (3.87–4.26) to 5.00 (4.81–5.19) after the TG-LASIK treatment (p < 0.0001). The study population’s binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/16, 20/12.5, and 20/10 or better in 100%, 87.0%, and 15.2% at 26 weeks post TG-LASIK, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction as assessed with the modified PROWL questionnaire is very high after undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software. Patient-reported outcomes add another dimension when assessing treatment efficacy beyond change in visual acuity and corneal architecture, and specialists may consider incorporating such assessments into the consenting process and patient education at large. Dove 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10540697/ /pubmed/37781320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S429991 Text en © 2023 Rush et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Rush, Sloan W
Pickett, Cory J
Wilson, Braden J
Rush, Ryan B
Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
title Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_full Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_fullStr Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_short Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
title_sort topography-guided lasik: a prospective study evaluating patient-reported outcomes
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781320
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S429991
work_keys_str_mv AT rushsloanw topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes
AT pickettcoryj topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes
AT wilsonbradenj topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes
AT rushryanb topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes