Cargando…
Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes
PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with a validated patient questionnaire following topography-guided LASIK (TG-LASIK). METHODS: Patients undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software were prospectively enrolled to receive an adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S429991 |
_version_ | 1785113765272879104 |
---|---|
author | Rush, Sloan W Pickett, Cory J Wilson, Braden J Rush, Ryan B |
author_facet | Rush, Sloan W Pickett, Cory J Wilson, Braden J Rush, Ryan B |
author_sort | Rush, Sloan W |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with a validated patient questionnaire following topography-guided LASIK (TG-LASIK). METHODS: Patients undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software were prospectively enrolled to receive an adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL) questionnaire before and 26-weeks after treatment. The main study outcome was the change in the Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the PROWL questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent treatment and completed the modified PROWL questionnaire before and 26-weeks after TG-LASIK. The Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the modified PROWL questionnaire improved from 4.07 (3.87–4.26) to 5.00 (4.81–5.19) after the TG-LASIK treatment (p < 0.0001). The study population’s binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/16, 20/12.5, and 20/10 or better in 100%, 87.0%, and 15.2% at 26 weeks post TG-LASIK, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction as assessed with the modified PROWL questionnaire is very high after undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software. Patient-reported outcomes add another dimension when assessing treatment efficacy beyond change in visual acuity and corneal architecture, and specialists may consider incorporating such assessments into the consenting process and patient education at large. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105406972023-09-30 Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes Rush, Sloan W Pickett, Cory J Wilson, Braden J Rush, Ryan B Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with a validated patient questionnaire following topography-guided LASIK (TG-LASIK). METHODS: Patients undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software were prospectively enrolled to receive an adapted Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL) questionnaire before and 26-weeks after treatment. The main study outcome was the change in the Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the PROWL questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent treatment and completed the modified PROWL questionnaire before and 26-weeks after TG-LASIK. The Global Vision Satisfaction Index from the modified PROWL questionnaire improved from 4.07 (3.87–4.26) to 5.00 (4.81–5.19) after the TG-LASIK treatment (p < 0.0001). The study population’s binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/16, 20/12.5, and 20/10 or better in 100%, 87.0%, and 15.2% at 26 weeks post TG-LASIK, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction as assessed with the modified PROWL questionnaire is very high after undergoing TG-LASIK using Phorcides analytic software. Patient-reported outcomes add another dimension when assessing treatment efficacy beyond change in visual acuity and corneal architecture, and specialists may consider incorporating such assessments into the consenting process and patient education at large. Dove 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10540697/ /pubmed/37781320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S429991 Text en © 2023 Rush et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Report Rush, Sloan W Pickett, Cory J Wilson, Braden J Rush, Ryan B Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title | Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_full | Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_short | Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes |
title_sort | topography-guided lasik: a prospective study evaluating patient-reported outcomes |
topic | Clinical Trial Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S429991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rushsloanw topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes AT pickettcoryj topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes AT wilsonbradenj topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes AT rushryanb topographyguidedlasikaprospectivestudyevaluatingpatientreportedoutcomes |