Cargando…
Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given the increase in methodological pluralism in research on brain health, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, this scoping review aims to provide a descriptive overview and qualitative content analysis of studies stating the use of participatory research app...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad091 |
_version_ | 1785113787324432384 |
---|---|
author | Reyes, Laurent Scher, Clara J Greenfield, Emily A |
author_facet | Reyes, Laurent Scher, Clara J Greenfield, Emily A |
author_sort | Reyes, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given the increase in methodological pluralism in research on brain health, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, this scoping review aims to provide a descriptive overview and qualitative content analysis of studies stating the use of participatory research approaches within Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) literature globally. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search across four multidisciplinary databases (CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycInfo, PubMed) for peer-reviewed, English-language studies addressing ADRD that explicitly described their use of a participatory research approach. We employed a systematic process for selecting articles that yielded a final sample of 163 studies. Data from articles were analyzed to chart trends from 1990 to 2022 in terminology, descriptions, application of participatory approaches, and the extent and nature of partnerships with nonacademics. RESULTS: Results demonstrated geographic differences in the use of stated approaches between North America—where community-based participatory research predominates—and Europe, where Action Research is most common. We further found that only 73% of papers in this systematic review had identifiable definitions or descriptions of the participatory approach used. Findings also showed that 14% of articles demonstrated no evidence of engaged partnership beyond activities typical of research participants, while 23% of articles identified partnering with people with dementia, and an additional 16% reported partnerships with members from Indigenous, Black, Asian, or Latinx communities. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review identifies three areas in need of greater attention in ADRD literature using participatory research approaches. First, findings indicate the importance of strengthening the use, transparency, and rigor of participatory methods. Second, results suggest the need for greater inclusion of historically marginalized groups who are most affected by ADRD as research partners. Finally, the findings highlight the need for integrating social justice values of participatory approaches into research project designs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10540816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105408162023-09-30 Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review Reyes, Laurent Scher, Clara J Greenfield, Emily A Innov Aging Scholarly Review BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Given the increase in methodological pluralism in research on brain health, cognitive aging, and neurodegenerative diseases, this scoping review aims to provide a descriptive overview and qualitative content analysis of studies stating the use of participatory research approaches within Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) literature globally. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search across four multidisciplinary databases (CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycInfo, PubMed) for peer-reviewed, English-language studies addressing ADRD that explicitly described their use of a participatory research approach. We employed a systematic process for selecting articles that yielded a final sample of 163 studies. Data from articles were analyzed to chart trends from 1990 to 2022 in terminology, descriptions, application of participatory approaches, and the extent and nature of partnerships with nonacademics. RESULTS: Results demonstrated geographic differences in the use of stated approaches between North America—where community-based participatory research predominates—and Europe, where Action Research is most common. We further found that only 73% of papers in this systematic review had identifiable definitions or descriptions of the participatory approach used. Findings also showed that 14% of articles demonstrated no evidence of engaged partnership beyond activities typical of research participants, while 23% of articles identified partnering with people with dementia, and an additional 16% reported partnerships with members from Indigenous, Black, Asian, or Latinx communities. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review identifies three areas in need of greater attention in ADRD literature using participatory research approaches. First, findings indicate the importance of strengthening the use, transparency, and rigor of participatory methods. Second, results suggest the need for greater inclusion of historically marginalized groups who are most affected by ADRD as research partners. Finally, the findings highlight the need for integrating social justice values of participatory approaches into research project designs. Oxford University Press 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10540816/ /pubmed/37781066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad091 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Scholarly Review Reyes, Laurent Scher, Clara J Greenfield, Emily A Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review |
title | Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Participatory Research Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Literature: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | participatory research approaches in alzheimer’s disease and related dementias literature: a scoping review |
topic | Scholarly Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37781066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reyeslaurent participatoryresearchapproachesinalzheimersdiseaseandrelateddementiasliteratureascopingreview AT scherclaraj participatoryresearchapproachesinalzheimersdiseaseandrelateddementiasliteratureascopingreview AT greenfieldemilya participatoryresearchapproachesinalzheimersdiseaseandrelateddementiasliteratureascopingreview |