Cargando…

The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence

BACKGROUND: Positive fusional vergence (PFV) is vital in maintaining fusion in critical and continuous near tasks such as reading or performing digital screen tasks. This study investigated how PFV changed under various lighting conditions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 34 participan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azam, Raisul, Karmakar, Sourav, Mondal, Animesh, Bhardwaj, Gaurav Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: White Rose University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780187
http://dx.doi.org/10.22599/bioj.296
_version_ 1785113871029108736
author Azam, Raisul
Karmakar, Sourav
Mondal, Animesh
Bhardwaj, Gaurav Kumar
author_facet Azam, Raisul
Karmakar, Sourav
Mondal, Animesh
Bhardwaj, Gaurav Kumar
author_sort Azam, Raisul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive fusional vergence (PFV) is vital in maintaining fusion in critical and continuous near tasks such as reading or performing digital screen tasks. This study investigated how PFV changed under various lighting conditions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 34 participants aged between 21 and 25 years, with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 0.0 logMAR and insignificant refractive error. Three different illuminations—low illumination (50 lux), medium lighting (100 lux), and high illumination (150 lux)—were used to examine the ocular parameters PFV (blur, break, and recovery points), contrast sensitivity and pupil diameter. RESULTS: Pupil diameter changed significantly in different room illuminations (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity across the three levels of room illumination (p = 0.368). Mean PFV (SD) (blur) was 14.5 (2.5) in 50 lux, 10.2 (2.2) in 100 lux, and 8.2 (2.1) in 150 lux. Under 50, 100 and 150 lux, respectively, the mean PFV (SD) (break) values were 16.7 (2.4), 13.4 (1.8), and 10.8 (2.2), and the mean PFV (SD) (recovery) values were 13.3 (2.1), 10.7 (2.1), and 7.5 (2.7). With increased illumination levels, PFV blur, break, and recovery values were significantly lower (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PFV values were significantly higher in lower illumination. Clinicians should be aware that room illumination affected the PFV values measured.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10541229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher White Rose University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105412292023-10-01 The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence Azam, Raisul Karmakar, Sourav Mondal, Animesh Bhardwaj, Gaurav Kumar Br Ir Orthopt J Original Article BACKGROUND: Positive fusional vergence (PFV) is vital in maintaining fusion in critical and continuous near tasks such as reading or performing digital screen tasks. This study investigated how PFV changed under various lighting conditions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 34 participants aged between 21 and 25 years, with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 0.0 logMAR and insignificant refractive error. Three different illuminations—low illumination (50 lux), medium lighting (100 lux), and high illumination (150 lux)—were used to examine the ocular parameters PFV (blur, break, and recovery points), contrast sensitivity and pupil diameter. RESULTS: Pupil diameter changed significantly in different room illuminations (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity across the three levels of room illumination (p = 0.368). Mean PFV (SD) (blur) was 14.5 (2.5) in 50 lux, 10.2 (2.2) in 100 lux, and 8.2 (2.1) in 150 lux. Under 50, 100 and 150 lux, respectively, the mean PFV (SD) (break) values were 16.7 (2.4), 13.4 (1.8), and 10.8 (2.2), and the mean PFV (SD) (recovery) values were 13.3 (2.1), 10.7 (2.1), and 7.5 (2.7). With increased illumination levels, PFV blur, break, and recovery values were significantly lower (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PFV values were significantly higher in lower illumination. Clinicians should be aware that room illumination affected the PFV values measured. White Rose University Press 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10541229/ /pubmed/37780187 http://dx.doi.org/10.22599/bioj.296 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azam, Raisul
Karmakar, Sourav
Mondal, Animesh
Bhardwaj, Gaurav Kumar
The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence
title The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence
title_full The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence
title_fullStr The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence
title_short The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence
title_sort effect of illumination on positive fusional vergence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37780187
http://dx.doi.org/10.22599/bioj.296
work_keys_str_mv AT azamraisul theeffectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT karmakarsourav theeffectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT mondalanimesh theeffectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT bhardwajgauravkumar theeffectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT azamraisul effectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT karmakarsourav effectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT mondalanimesh effectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence
AT bhardwajgauravkumar effectofilluminationonpositivefusionalvergence