Cargando…

Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs

Reasonable production allocation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs is an important basis for efficient development of gas wells. Taking Block XX in Ordos Basin as an example, the modified flowing material balance equation was established considering the variation of gas viscosity and compression coe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Jie, Liu, Zhiwei, Zhang, Heng, Xie, Shenghong, Wang, Xiqiang, Zhu, Yushuang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43640-7
_version_ 1785113897888382976
author He, Jie
Liu, Zhiwei
Zhang, Heng
Xie, Shenghong
Wang, Xiqiang
Zhu, Yushuang
author_facet He, Jie
Liu, Zhiwei
Zhang, Heng
Xie, Shenghong
Wang, Xiqiang
Zhu, Yushuang
author_sort He, Jie
collection PubMed
description Reasonable production allocation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs is an important basis for efficient development of gas wells. Taking Block XX in Ordos Basin as an example, the modified flowing material balance equation was established considering the variation of gas viscosity and compression coefficient, the advantages and disadvantages of the method were discussed, and a reasonable production allocation process for gas wells was developed. The results show that: ① The commonly used flow material balance method ignores the change of natural gas compression coefficient, viscosity and deviation coefficient in the production process. The slope of the relationship curve between bottom hole pressure and cumulative production and the slope of the relationship curve between average formation pressure and cumulative production are not equal After considering this change. Compared with the results calculated by the material balance method, the results calculated by the flow material balance method are smaller. ② The production of 660 gas wells in the study area during stable production period is verified. Compared with the open flow method, the dynamic reserve allocation method is better, with an error of 0.06%. ③ The new method in this paper is used to allocate production for different types of gas wells. The cumulative production of different types of gas wells shows different degrees of increase. The I, II, III and IV types of gas wells increase by 32.26%, 30.29%, 23.58% and 25.07% respectively. This study provides technical support for dynamic reserve calculation and reasonable production allocation of gas wells in the study area, and has important guiding significance for the formulation of reasonable development plan and economic and efficient development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10541403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105414032023-10-01 Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs He, Jie Liu, Zhiwei Zhang, Heng Xie, Shenghong Wang, Xiqiang Zhu, Yushuang Sci Rep Article Reasonable production allocation of tight sandstone gas reservoirs is an important basis for efficient development of gas wells. Taking Block XX in Ordos Basin as an example, the modified flowing material balance equation was established considering the variation of gas viscosity and compression coefficient, the advantages and disadvantages of the method were discussed, and a reasonable production allocation process for gas wells was developed. The results show that: ① The commonly used flow material balance method ignores the change of natural gas compression coefficient, viscosity and deviation coefficient in the production process. The slope of the relationship curve between bottom hole pressure and cumulative production and the slope of the relationship curve between average formation pressure and cumulative production are not equal After considering this change. Compared with the results calculated by the material balance method, the results calculated by the flow material balance method are smaller. ② The production of 660 gas wells in the study area during stable production period is verified. Compared with the open flow method, the dynamic reserve allocation method is better, with an error of 0.06%. ③ The new method in this paper is used to allocate production for different types of gas wells. The cumulative production of different types of gas wells shows different degrees of increase. The I, II, III and IV types of gas wells increase by 32.26%, 30.29%, 23.58% and 25.07% respectively. This study provides technical support for dynamic reserve calculation and reasonable production allocation of gas wells in the study area, and has important guiding significance for the formulation of reasonable development plan and economic and efficient development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10541403/ /pubmed/37773432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43640-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
He, Jie
Liu, Zhiwei
Zhang, Heng
Xie, Shenghong
Wang, Xiqiang
Zhu, Yushuang
Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
title Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
title_full Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
title_fullStr Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
title_full_unstemmed Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
title_short Study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
title_sort study on development methods of different types of gas wells in tight sandstone gas reservoirs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43640-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hejie studyondevelopmentmethodsofdifferenttypesofgaswellsintightsandstonegasreservoirs
AT liuzhiwei studyondevelopmentmethodsofdifferenttypesofgaswellsintightsandstonegasreservoirs
AT zhangheng studyondevelopmentmethodsofdifferenttypesofgaswellsintightsandstonegasreservoirs
AT xieshenghong studyondevelopmentmethodsofdifferenttypesofgaswellsintightsandstonegasreservoirs
AT wangxiqiang studyondevelopmentmethodsofdifferenttypesofgaswellsintightsandstonegasreservoirs
AT zhuyushuang studyondevelopmentmethodsofdifferenttypesofgaswellsintightsandstonegasreservoirs