Cargando…
A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study
BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity and is widely used in clinical settings with a wide range of populations, including older people and clients with neurological disorders. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present a newly developed digitized version of th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37713251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50474 |
_version_ | 1785113940418625536 |
---|---|
author | Prochaska, Eveline Ammenwerth, Elske |
author_facet | Prochaska, Eveline Ammenwerth, Elske |
author_sort | Prochaska, Eveline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity and is widely used in clinical settings with a wide range of populations, including older people and clients with neurological disorders. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present a newly developed digitized version of the BBT, called the digital BBT (dBBT). The physical design is similar to the original BBT, but the dBBT contains digital electronics that automate the test procedure, timing, and score measurement. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the dBBT. METHODS: We performed measurements at 2 time points for 29 healthy participants. BBT and dBBT were used at the first measurement time point, and dBBT was used again at the second measurement time point. Concurrent validity was assessed using the correlation between BBT and dBBT, the paired t test, and the Bland-Altman analysis. Test-retest reliability and interrater reliability were examined using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by repeated measures with the dBBT within an interval of 10 days. RESULTS: Our results showed moderate concurrent validity (r=0.48, P=.008), moderate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.72, P<.001), a standard error of measurement of 3.1 blocks, and the smallest detectable change at a 95% CI of 8.5 blocks. Interrater reliability was moderate with an ICC of 0.67 (P=.02). The Bland-Altman analysis showed sufficient accuracy of the dBBT in comparison with the conventional BBT. CONCLUSIONS: The dBBT can contribute to objectifying the measurement of gross hand dexterity without losing its important characteristics and is simple to implement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10541645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105416452023-10-02 A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study Prochaska, Eveline Ammenwerth, Elske JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Original Paper BACKGROUND: The Box and Block Test (BBT) measures unilateral gross manual dexterity and is widely used in clinical settings with a wide range of populations, including older people and clients with neurological disorders. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we present a newly developed digitized version of the BBT, called the digital BBT (dBBT). The physical design is similar to the original BBT, but the dBBT contains digital electronics that automate the test procedure, timing, and score measurement. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the dBBT. METHODS: We performed measurements at 2 time points for 29 healthy participants. BBT and dBBT were used at the first measurement time point, and dBBT was used again at the second measurement time point. Concurrent validity was assessed using the correlation between BBT and dBBT, the paired t test, and the Bland-Altman analysis. Test-retest reliability and interrater reliability were examined using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by repeated measures with the dBBT within an interval of 10 days. RESULTS: Our results showed moderate concurrent validity (r=0.48, P=.008), moderate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.72, P<.001), a standard error of measurement of 3.1 blocks, and the smallest detectable change at a 95% CI of 8.5 blocks. Interrater reliability was moderate with an ICC of 0.67 (P=.02). The Bland-Altman analysis showed sufficient accuracy of the dBBT in comparison with the conventional BBT. CONCLUSIONS: The dBBT can contribute to objectifying the measurement of gross hand dexterity without losing its important characteristics and is simple to implement. JMIR Publications 2023-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10541645/ /pubmed/37713251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50474 Text en ©Eveline Prochaska, Elske Ammenwerth. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 15.09.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Prochaska, Eveline Ammenwerth, Elske A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study |
title | A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study |
title_full | A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study |
title_fullStr | A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study |
title_short | A Digital Box and Block Test for Hand Dexterity Measurement: Instrument Validation Study |
title_sort | digital box and block test for hand dexterity measurement: instrument validation study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37713251 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/50474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prochaskaeveline adigitalboxandblocktestforhanddexteritymeasurementinstrumentvalidationstudy AT ammenwerthelske adigitalboxandblocktestforhanddexteritymeasurementinstrumentvalidationstudy AT prochaskaeveline digitalboxandblocktestforhanddexteritymeasurementinstrumentvalidationstudy AT ammenwerthelske digitalboxandblocktestforhanddexteritymeasurementinstrumentvalidationstudy |