Cargando…

Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?

INTRODUCTION: Honey bee viruses have been shown to negatively affect the vigour and longevity of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L). In the present work, beehive materials were tested for their potential to serve as non-invasive samples for honey bee virus detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Honey,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Čukanová, Eliška, Prodělalová, Jana, Palíková, Miroslava, Kováčová, Kristýna, Linhart, Petr, Papežíková, Ivana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37786848
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2023-0046
_version_ 1785113946916651008
author Čukanová, Eliška
Prodělalová, Jana
Palíková, Miroslava
Kováčová, Kristýna
Linhart, Petr
Papežíková, Ivana
author_facet Čukanová, Eliška
Prodělalová, Jana
Palíková, Miroslava
Kováčová, Kristýna
Linhart, Petr
Papežíková, Ivana
author_sort Čukanová, Eliška
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Honey bee viruses have been shown to negatively affect the vigour and longevity of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L). In the present work, beehive materials were tested for their potential to serve as non-invasive samples for honey bee virus detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Honey, pollen, hive debris, hive grid smears and forager honey bees were collected from 24 hives at four locations in the Czech Republic. Deformed wing virus (DWV), acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), sacbrood virus (SBV) and black queen cell virus (BQCV) were detected using a reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and real-time quantitative RT-PCR and the results for bees and alternative materials compared. RESULTS: All forager bee samples contained DWV, BQCV and SBV and 54.2% had ABPV. When comparing beehive materials to bees, the most promising results were obtained from honey and pollen samples, with BQCV and SBV detected in all honey samples and ABPV in 12.5%. Detection of SBV was achieved in 91.6% of pollen samples, detection of BQCV in 87.5% and detection of DWW in 75%. The results for debris and smears were less consistent with the viral profile of the forager samples. CONCLUSION: The best candidate materials for honey bee virus detection in a non-invasive technique are honey and pollen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10541673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105416732023-10-02 Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies? Čukanová, Eliška Prodělalová, Jana Palíková, Miroslava Kováčová, Kristýna Linhart, Petr Papežíková, Ivana J Vet Res Article INTRODUCTION: Honey bee viruses have been shown to negatively affect the vigour and longevity of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L). In the present work, beehive materials were tested for their potential to serve as non-invasive samples for honey bee virus detection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Honey, pollen, hive debris, hive grid smears and forager honey bees were collected from 24 hives at four locations in the Czech Republic. Deformed wing virus (DWV), acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV), sacbrood virus (SBV) and black queen cell virus (BQCV) were detected using a reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and real-time quantitative RT-PCR and the results for bees and alternative materials compared. RESULTS: All forager bee samples contained DWV, BQCV and SBV and 54.2% had ABPV. When comparing beehive materials to bees, the most promising results were obtained from honey and pollen samples, with BQCV and SBV detected in all honey samples and ABPV in 12.5%. Detection of SBV was achieved in 91.6% of pollen samples, detection of BQCV in 87.5% and detection of DWW in 75%. The results for debris and smears were less consistent with the viral profile of the forager samples. CONCLUSION: The best candidate materials for honey bee virus detection in a non-invasive technique are honey and pollen. Sciendo 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10541673/ /pubmed/37786848 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2023-0046 Text en © 2023 Eliška Čukanová et al., published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Čukanová, Eliška
Prodělalová, Jana
Palíková, Miroslava
Kováčová, Kristýna
Linhart, Petr
Papežíková, Ivana
Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?
title Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?
title_full Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?
title_fullStr Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?
title_full_unstemmed Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?
title_short Can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies?
title_sort can the examination of different types of hive samples be a non-invasive method for detection and quantification of viruses in honey bee (apis mellifera l.) colonies?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37786848
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2023-0046
work_keys_str_mv AT cukanovaeliska cantheexaminationofdifferenttypesofhivesamplesbeanoninvasivemethodfordetectionandquantificationofvirusesinhoneybeeapismelliferalcolonies
AT prodelalovajana cantheexaminationofdifferenttypesofhivesamplesbeanoninvasivemethodfordetectionandquantificationofvirusesinhoneybeeapismelliferalcolonies
AT palikovamiroslava cantheexaminationofdifferenttypesofhivesamplesbeanoninvasivemethodfordetectionandquantificationofvirusesinhoneybeeapismelliferalcolonies
AT kovacovakristyna cantheexaminationofdifferenttypesofhivesamplesbeanoninvasivemethodfordetectionandquantificationofvirusesinhoneybeeapismelliferalcolonies
AT linhartpetr cantheexaminationofdifferenttypesofhivesamplesbeanoninvasivemethodfordetectionandquantificationofvirusesinhoneybeeapismelliferalcolonies
AT papezikovaivana cantheexaminationofdifferenttypesofhivesamplesbeanoninvasivemethodfordetectionandquantificationofvirusesinhoneybeeapismelliferalcolonies