Cargando…

Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this examination was to assess, which risk factors impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) in the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. METHODS: A consecutive series of 241 TPO was reviewed retrospectively. Of these, a set of five postoperative radiographs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dornacher, Daniel, Lutz, Bernd, Sgroi, Mirco, Caffard, Thomas, Reichel, Heiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37421516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04966-z
_version_ 1785113985581842432
author Dornacher, Daniel
Lutz, Bernd
Sgroi, Mirco
Caffard, Thomas
Reichel, Heiko
author_facet Dornacher, Daniel
Lutz, Bernd
Sgroi, Mirco
Caffard, Thomas
Reichel, Heiko
author_sort Dornacher, Daniel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this examination was to assess, which risk factors impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) in the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. METHODS: A consecutive series of 241 TPO was reviewed retrospectively. Of these, a set of five postoperative radiographs was available, performed in a standardized regimen in the first year after surgery. Two experienced observers had to agree on the existence of a non-union on the radiographs obtained 1 year after TPO. Both observers measured the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) on all radiographs. Besides patient-specific risk factors, the magnitudes of acetabular correction and the amounts of a detectable slight change in acetabular correction were assessed. Binary logistic regression analysis and chi-squared test were used to detect the impact of the risk factor on bone healing. RESULTS: A total of 222 cases were left for further examination. In 19 of these, at least one osteotomy was not healed completely one year after surgery. Binary logistic regression showed a significant relationship between the risk factors “age” (p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 1.109 (95% CI 1.05–1.18)) as well as “magnitude of acetabular correction (LCEA)” (p = 0.01; OR 1.087 (95% CI 1.02–1.16)) and non-union. Pearson’s chi-square test showed a relationship between the risk factor “wound healing disorder” and non-union (p < 0.001). LCEA and AI showed a slight increase from the first to the last follow-up (observer 1: 1.6° and 1.3°, resp.), but regression analysis for the risk factor “amount of postoperative change of acetabular correction (LCEA, AI)” did not show statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: The age at surgery and the magnitude of acetabular correction negatively influenced the healing progress of the osteotomy sites. The amount of a slight postoperative change of LCEA and AI did not correlate with a non-union.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10541840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105418402023-10-02 Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy Dornacher, Daniel Lutz, Bernd Sgroi, Mirco Caffard, Thomas Reichel, Heiko Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Orthopaedic Surgery INTRODUCTION: The aim of this examination was to assess, which risk factors impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy (TPO) in the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia. METHODS: A consecutive series of 241 TPO was reviewed retrospectively. Of these, a set of five postoperative radiographs was available, performed in a standardized regimen in the first year after surgery. Two experienced observers had to agree on the existence of a non-union on the radiographs obtained 1 year after TPO. Both observers measured the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular index (AI) on all radiographs. Besides patient-specific risk factors, the magnitudes of acetabular correction and the amounts of a detectable slight change in acetabular correction were assessed. Binary logistic regression analysis and chi-squared test were used to detect the impact of the risk factor on bone healing. RESULTS: A total of 222 cases were left for further examination. In 19 of these, at least one osteotomy was not healed completely one year after surgery. Binary logistic regression showed a significant relationship between the risk factors “age” (p < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 1.109 (95% CI 1.05–1.18)) as well as “magnitude of acetabular correction (LCEA)” (p = 0.01; OR 1.087 (95% CI 1.02–1.16)) and non-union. Pearson’s chi-square test showed a relationship between the risk factor “wound healing disorder” and non-union (p < 0.001). LCEA and AI showed a slight increase from the first to the last follow-up (observer 1: 1.6° and 1.3°, resp.), but regression analysis for the risk factor “amount of postoperative change of acetabular correction (LCEA, AI)” did not show statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: The age at surgery and the magnitude of acetabular correction negatively influenced the healing progress of the osteotomy sites. The amount of a slight postoperative change of LCEA and AI did not correlate with a non-union. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10541840/ /pubmed/37421516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04966-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Orthopaedic Surgery
Dornacher, Daniel
Lutz, Bernd
Sgroi, Mirco
Caffard, Thomas
Reichel, Heiko
Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
title Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
title_full Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
title_fullStr Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
title_full_unstemmed Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
title_short Age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
title_sort age and magnitude of acetabular correction impair bone healing after triple pelvic osteotomy
topic Orthopaedic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37421516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04966-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dornacherdaniel ageandmagnitudeofacetabularcorrectionimpairbonehealingaftertriplepelvicosteotomy
AT lutzbernd ageandmagnitudeofacetabularcorrectionimpairbonehealingaftertriplepelvicosteotomy
AT sgroimirco ageandmagnitudeofacetabularcorrectionimpairbonehealingaftertriplepelvicosteotomy
AT caffardthomas ageandmagnitudeofacetabularcorrectionimpairbonehealingaftertriplepelvicosteotomy
AT reichelheiko ageandmagnitudeofacetabularcorrectionimpairbonehealingaftertriplepelvicosteotomy