Cargando…

National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

INTRODUCTION: Interpretation of patient-reported outcome scores such as the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) can be improved with use of reference values. The aim of the study was to establish population-based reference values for the HOOS’ five subscales and its short-form HOO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Peter, Rathleff, Michael S., Roos, Ewa M., Elsoe, Rasmus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04915-w
_version_ 1785114064601481216
author Larsen, Peter
Rathleff, Michael S.
Roos, Ewa M.
Elsoe, Rasmus
author_facet Larsen, Peter
Rathleff, Michael S.
Roos, Ewa M.
Elsoe, Rasmus
author_sort Larsen, Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Interpretation of patient-reported outcome scores such as the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) can be improved with use of reference values. The aim of the study was to establish population-based reference values for the HOOS’ five subscales and its short-form HOOS-12. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A representative sample of 9997 Danish citizens 18 years and older were identified. The population record-based sample was based on seven predefined age groups and an equal sex distribution within each age group. A national secure electronic system was used to send the HOOS questionnaire and one supplementary question regarding previous hip complaints to all participants. RESULTS: 2277 participants completed the HOOS, 947 women (42%) and 1330 men (58%). The mean HOOS subscale scores were: pain 86.9 (95% CI 86.1–87.7), symptoms 83.7 (95% CI 82.9–84.5), ADL 88.2 (95% CI 87.5–89.0), sport and recreation function 83.1 (95% CI 82.0–84.1), QOL 82.7 (95% CI 81.8–83.6). The youngest age group reported better mean scores in four subscales compared to the oldest age group (pain 91.7 vs. 84.5, mean difference 7.2 95% CI 0.4–14.0), (ADL 94.6 points vs. 83.2, mean difference 11.4 95% CI 4.9–17.8), (sport and recreation function 91.5 points vs. 73.8 points, mean difference 17.7 95% CI 9.0–26.4), (QOL 88.9 points vs. 78.8, mean difference 10.1 points 95% CI 2.0–18.2). Participants with a self-reported hip complaint had worse HOOS scores across all subscales (mean difference range 22.1–34.6). Super obese patients (BMI > 40) had > 12.5 points worse scores across the five HOOS subscales. Results were similar for the HOOS-12. CONCLUSION: This study provides reference values for the HOOS and its short form HOOS-12. Results show that older patients and patients with a BMI over 40 have worse HOOS and HOOS-12 scores that may be of clinical importance in the interpretation of scores both when evaluating potential for improvement and post-treatment results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10542294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105422942023-10-03 National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) Larsen, Peter Rathleff, Michael S. Roos, Ewa M. Elsoe, Rasmus Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: Interpretation of patient-reported outcome scores such as the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) can be improved with use of reference values. The aim of the study was to establish population-based reference values for the HOOS’ five subscales and its short-form HOOS-12. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A representative sample of 9997 Danish citizens 18 years and older were identified. The population record-based sample was based on seven predefined age groups and an equal sex distribution within each age group. A national secure electronic system was used to send the HOOS questionnaire and one supplementary question regarding previous hip complaints to all participants. RESULTS: 2277 participants completed the HOOS, 947 women (42%) and 1330 men (58%). The mean HOOS subscale scores were: pain 86.9 (95% CI 86.1–87.7), symptoms 83.7 (95% CI 82.9–84.5), ADL 88.2 (95% CI 87.5–89.0), sport and recreation function 83.1 (95% CI 82.0–84.1), QOL 82.7 (95% CI 81.8–83.6). The youngest age group reported better mean scores in four subscales compared to the oldest age group (pain 91.7 vs. 84.5, mean difference 7.2 95% CI 0.4–14.0), (ADL 94.6 points vs. 83.2, mean difference 11.4 95% CI 4.9–17.8), (sport and recreation function 91.5 points vs. 73.8 points, mean difference 17.7 95% CI 9.0–26.4), (QOL 88.9 points vs. 78.8, mean difference 10.1 points 95% CI 2.0–18.2). Participants with a self-reported hip complaint had worse HOOS scores across all subscales (mean difference range 22.1–34.6). Super obese patients (BMI > 40) had > 12.5 points worse scores across the five HOOS subscales. Results were similar for the HOOS-12. CONCLUSION: This study provides reference values for the HOOS and its short form HOOS-12. Results show that older patients and patients with a BMI over 40 have worse HOOS and HOOS-12 scores that may be of clinical importance in the interpretation of scores both when evaluating potential for improvement and post-treatment results. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10542294/ /pubmed/37277643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04915-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Larsen, Peter
Rathleff, Michael S.
Roos, Ewa M.
Elsoe, Rasmus
National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
title National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
title_full National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
title_fullStr National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
title_full_unstemmed National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
title_short National population-based reference data for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)
title_sort national population-based reference data for the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (hoos)
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04915-w
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenpeter nationalpopulationbasedreferencedataforthehipdisabilityandosteoarthritisoutcomescorehoos
AT rathleffmichaels nationalpopulationbasedreferencedataforthehipdisabilityandosteoarthritisoutcomescorehoos
AT roosewam nationalpopulationbasedreferencedataforthehipdisabilityandosteoarthritisoutcomescorehoos
AT elsoerasmus nationalpopulationbasedreferencedataforthehipdisabilityandosteoarthritisoutcomescorehoos