Cargando…

Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap

Individual differences in the spatial organization of resting state networks have received increased attention in recent years. Measures of individual-specific spatial organization of brain networks and overlapping network organization have been linked to important behavioral and clinical traits and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bijsterbosch, Janine D., Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan, Glasser, Matthew F., Essen, David Van, Snyder, Lawrence H., Woolrich, Mark W., Smith, Stephen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.21.558809
_version_ 1785114114451832832
author Bijsterbosch, Janine D.
Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan
Glasser, Matthew F.
Essen, David Van
Snyder, Lawrence H.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Smith, Stephen M.
author_facet Bijsterbosch, Janine D.
Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan
Glasser, Matthew F.
Essen, David Van
Snyder, Lawrence H.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Smith, Stephen M.
author_sort Bijsterbosch, Janine D.
collection PubMed
description Individual differences in the spatial organization of resting state networks have received increased attention in recent years. Measures of individual-specific spatial organization of brain networks and overlapping network organization have been linked to important behavioral and clinical traits and are therefore potential biomarker targets for personalized psychiatry approaches. To better understand individual-specific spatial brain organization, this paper addressed three key goals. First, we determined whether it is possible to reliably estimate weighted (non-binarized) resting state network maps using data from only a single individual, while also maintaining maximum spatial correspondence across individuals. Second, we determined the degree of spatial overlap between distinct networks, using test-retest and twin data. Third, we systematically tested multiple hypotheses (spatial mixing, temporal switching, and coupling) as candidate explanations for why networks overlap spatially. To estimate weighted network organization, we adopt the Probabilistic Functional Modes (PROFUMO) algorithm, which implements a Bayesian framework with hemodynamic and connectivity priors to supplement optimization for spatial sparsity/independence. Our findings showed that replicable individual-specific estimates of weighted resting state networks can be derived using high quality fMRI data within individual subjects. Network organization estimates using only data from each individual subject closely resembled group-informed network estimates (which was not explicitly modeled in our individual-specific analyses), suggesting that cross-subject correspondence was largely maintained. Furthermore, our results confirmed the presence of spatial overlap in network organization, which was replicable across sessions within individuals and in monozygotic twin pairs. Intriguingly, our findings provide evidence that network overlap is indicative of linear additive coupling. These results suggest that regions of network overlap concurrently process information from all contributing networks, potentially pointing to the role of overlapping network organization in the integration of information across multiple brain systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10542549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105425492023-10-03 Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap Bijsterbosch, Janine D. Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan Glasser, Matthew F. Essen, David Van Snyder, Lawrence H. Woolrich, Mark W. Smith, Stephen M. bioRxiv Article Individual differences in the spatial organization of resting state networks have received increased attention in recent years. Measures of individual-specific spatial organization of brain networks and overlapping network organization have been linked to important behavioral and clinical traits and are therefore potential biomarker targets for personalized psychiatry approaches. To better understand individual-specific spatial brain organization, this paper addressed three key goals. First, we determined whether it is possible to reliably estimate weighted (non-binarized) resting state network maps using data from only a single individual, while also maintaining maximum spatial correspondence across individuals. Second, we determined the degree of spatial overlap between distinct networks, using test-retest and twin data. Third, we systematically tested multiple hypotheses (spatial mixing, temporal switching, and coupling) as candidate explanations for why networks overlap spatially. To estimate weighted network organization, we adopt the Probabilistic Functional Modes (PROFUMO) algorithm, which implements a Bayesian framework with hemodynamic and connectivity priors to supplement optimization for spatial sparsity/independence. Our findings showed that replicable individual-specific estimates of weighted resting state networks can be derived using high quality fMRI data within individual subjects. Network organization estimates using only data from each individual subject closely resembled group-informed network estimates (which was not explicitly modeled in our individual-specific analyses), suggesting that cross-subject correspondence was largely maintained. Furthermore, our results confirmed the presence of spatial overlap in network organization, which was replicable across sessions within individuals and in monozygotic twin pairs. Intriguingly, our findings provide evidence that network overlap is indicative of linear additive coupling. These results suggest that regions of network overlap concurrently process information from all contributing networks, potentially pointing to the role of overlapping network organization in the integration of information across multiple brain systems. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10542549/ /pubmed/37790508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.21.558809 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Bijsterbosch, Janine D.
Farahibozorg, Seyedeh-Rezvan
Glasser, Matthew F.
Essen, David Van
Snyder, Lawrence H.
Woolrich, Mark W.
Smith, Stephen M.
Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
title Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
title_full Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
title_fullStr Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
title_short Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
title_sort evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.21.558809
work_keys_str_mv AT bijsterboschjanined evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap
AT farahibozorgseyedehrezvan evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap
AT glassermatthewf evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap
AT essendavidvan evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap
AT snyderlawrenceh evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap
AT woolrichmarkw evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap
AT smithstephenm evaluatingfunctionalbrainorganizationinindividualsandidentifyingcontributionstonetworkoverlap