Cargando…

How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?

PURPOSE: We aimed at comparing (99m)Tc-HMPAO white blood cells ((99m)Tc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauri, Chiara, Campagna, Giuseppe, Aloisi, Francesco, Posa, Alessandro, Iezzi, Roberto, Sirignano, Pasqualino, Taurino, Maurizio, Signore, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06309-x
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We aimed at comparing (99m)Tc-HMPAO white blood cells ((99m)Tc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, we attempted to define a new visual score for interpreting [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans aiming at increasing its specificity. METHODS: We prospectively compared (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, and CTA in 26 patients with suspected abdominal VGEI. WBC scans were performed and interpreted according to EANM recommendations. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT studies were assessed with both qualitative (Sah’s scale and new visual score) and semi-quantitative analyses. CTA images were interpreted according to MAGIC criteria. Microbiology, histopathology or a clinical follow-up of at least 24 months were used to achieve final diagnosis. RESULTS: Eleven out of 26 patients were infected. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT showed 100% sensitivity and NPV, with both scoring systems, thus representing an efficient tool to rule out the infection. The use of a more detailed scoring system provided statistically higher specificity compared to the previous Sah’s scale (p = 0.049). (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT provided statistically higher specificity and PPV than [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, regardless the interpretation criteria used and it can be, therefore, used in early post-surgical phases or to confirm or rule out a PET/CT finding. CONCLUSIONS: After CTA, patients with suspected late VGEI should perform a [(18)F]FDG PET/CT given its high sensitivity and NPV. However, given its lower specificity, positive results should be confirmed with (99m)Tc-WBC scintigraphy. The use of a more detailed scoring system reduces the number of (99m)Tc-WBC scans needed after [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. Nevertheless, in suspected infections within 4 months from surgery, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT should be performed as second exam, due to its high accuracy in differentiating sterile inflammation from infection.