Cargando…

How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?

PURPOSE: We aimed at comparing (99m)Tc-HMPAO white blood cells ((99m)Tc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauri, Chiara, Campagna, Giuseppe, Aloisi, Francesco, Posa, Alessandro, Iezzi, Roberto, Sirignano, Pasqualino, Taurino, Maurizio, Signore, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06309-x
_version_ 1785114158165917696
author Lauri, Chiara
Campagna, Giuseppe
Aloisi, Francesco
Posa, Alessandro
Iezzi, Roberto
Sirignano, Pasqualino
Taurino, Maurizio
Signore, Alberto
author_facet Lauri, Chiara
Campagna, Giuseppe
Aloisi, Francesco
Posa, Alessandro
Iezzi, Roberto
Sirignano, Pasqualino
Taurino, Maurizio
Signore, Alberto
author_sort Lauri, Chiara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed at comparing (99m)Tc-HMPAO white blood cells ((99m)Tc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, we attempted to define a new visual score for interpreting [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans aiming at increasing its specificity. METHODS: We prospectively compared (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, and CTA in 26 patients with suspected abdominal VGEI. WBC scans were performed and interpreted according to EANM recommendations. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT studies were assessed with both qualitative (Sah’s scale and new visual score) and semi-quantitative analyses. CTA images were interpreted according to MAGIC criteria. Microbiology, histopathology or a clinical follow-up of at least 24 months were used to achieve final diagnosis. RESULTS: Eleven out of 26 patients were infected. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT showed 100% sensitivity and NPV, with both scoring systems, thus representing an efficient tool to rule out the infection. The use of a more detailed scoring system provided statistically higher specificity compared to the previous Sah’s scale (p = 0.049). (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT provided statistically higher specificity and PPV than [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, regardless the interpretation criteria used and it can be, therefore, used in early post-surgical phases or to confirm or rule out a PET/CT finding. CONCLUSIONS: After CTA, patients with suspected late VGEI should perform a [(18)F]FDG PET/CT given its high sensitivity and NPV. However, given its lower specificity, positive results should be confirmed with (99m)Tc-WBC scintigraphy. The use of a more detailed scoring system reduces the number of (99m)Tc-WBC scans needed after [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. Nevertheless, in suspected infections within 4 months from surgery, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT should be performed as second exam, due to its high accuracy in differentiating sterile inflammation from infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10542742
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105427422023-10-03 How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections? Lauri, Chiara Campagna, Giuseppe Aloisi, Francesco Posa, Alessandro Iezzi, Roberto Sirignano, Pasqualino Taurino, Maurizio Signore, Alberto Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: We aimed at comparing (99m)Tc-HMPAO white blood cells ((99m)Tc-WBC) scintigraphy, 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected abdominal vascular graft or endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, we attempted to define a new visual score for interpreting [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans aiming at increasing its specificity. METHODS: We prospectively compared (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, and CTA in 26 patients with suspected abdominal VGEI. WBC scans were performed and interpreted according to EANM recommendations. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT studies were assessed with both qualitative (Sah’s scale and new visual score) and semi-quantitative analyses. CTA images were interpreted according to MAGIC criteria. Microbiology, histopathology or a clinical follow-up of at least 24 months were used to achieve final diagnosis. RESULTS: Eleven out of 26 patients were infected. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT showed 100% sensitivity and NPV, with both scoring systems, thus representing an efficient tool to rule out the infection. The use of a more detailed scoring system provided statistically higher specificity compared to the previous Sah’s scale (p = 0.049). (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT provided statistically higher specificity and PPV than [(18)F]FDG PET/CT, regardless the interpretation criteria used and it can be, therefore, used in early post-surgical phases or to confirm or rule out a PET/CT finding. CONCLUSIONS: After CTA, patients with suspected late VGEI should perform a [(18)F]FDG PET/CT given its high sensitivity and NPV. However, given its lower specificity, positive results should be confirmed with (99m)Tc-WBC scintigraphy. The use of a more detailed scoring system reduces the number of (99m)Tc-WBC scans needed after [(18)F]FDG PET/CT. Nevertheless, in suspected infections within 4 months from surgery, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT should be performed as second exam, due to its high accuracy in differentiating sterile inflammation from infection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10542742/ /pubmed/37367965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06309-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lauri, Chiara
Campagna, Giuseppe
Aloisi, Francesco
Posa, Alessandro
Iezzi, Roberto
Sirignano, Pasqualino
Taurino, Maurizio
Signore, Alberto
How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
title How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
title_full How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
title_fullStr How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
title_full_unstemmed How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
title_short How to combine CTA, (99m)Tc-WBC SPECT/CT, and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
title_sort how to combine cta, (99m)tc-wbc spect/ct, and [(18)f]fdg pet/ct in patients with suspected abdominal vascular endograft infections?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542742/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37367965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06309-x
work_keys_str_mv AT laurichiara howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT campagnagiuseppe howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT aloisifrancesco howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT posaalessandro howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT iezziroberto howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT sirignanopasqualino howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT taurinomaurizio howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections
AT signorealberto howtocombinecta99mtcwbcspectctand18ffdgpetctinpatientswithsuspectedabdominalvascularendograftinfections