Cargando…

Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE: Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Hayk, Kefah, Smadi, Mahmoud M, Elsalem, Lina M, Yassin, Ahmed, Aqaileh, Suha, Obiedat, Deema H, Al-Hayk, Ahmad Kefah, Al Qawasmeh, Majdi, Kofahi, Raid, El-Salem, Khalid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791113
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426076
_version_ 1785114222228668416
author Al-Hayk, Kefah
Smadi, Mahmoud M
Elsalem, Lina M
Yassin, Ahmed
Aqaileh, Suha
Obiedat, Deema H
Al-Hayk, Ahmad Kefah
Al Qawasmeh, Majdi
Kofahi, Raid
El-Salem, Khalid
author_facet Al-Hayk, Kefah
Smadi, Mahmoud M
Elsalem, Lina M
Yassin, Ahmed
Aqaileh, Suha
Obiedat, Deema H
Al-Hayk, Ahmad Kefah
Al Qawasmeh, Majdi
Kofahi, Raid
El-Salem, Khalid
author_sort Al-Hayk, Kefah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20–45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain. RESULTS: Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired t-test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values<0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10543085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105430852023-10-03 Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study Al-Hayk, Kefah Smadi, Mahmoud M Elsalem, Lina M Yassin, Ahmed Aqaileh, Suha Obiedat, Deema H Al-Hayk, Ahmad Kefah Al Qawasmeh, Majdi Kofahi, Raid El-Salem, Khalid Local Reg Anesth Original Research PURPOSE: Procedure discomfort can limit electrodiagnostic studies. Reducing discomfort can maximize the benefits of these diagnostic tools. This study targeted the discomfort associated with nerve conduction studies (NCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study comparing the effect of topical lidocaine gel (2%) versus analgesic-free lubricant gel (K-Y gel) on pain perception during NCS. Sequential patients (n=130) referred for routine NCS participated in the study. We applied 1 mL of lidocaine gel to one palm, and 1 mL of K-Y gel to the other as a control. After 20–45 min of application, graded increments of electrical stimulation intensity were delivered to record the median and ulnar mixed palmar nerve responses. Patients were then asked to score the degree of pain felt from electrical stimulation over each palm using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), independent of baseline pain. RESULTS: Mean WBFPS and NRS scores for lidocaine-treated palms were significantly lower than those for controls using parametric paired t-test (3.79 vs 4.37 and 3.35 vs 3.78 respectively, all p-values<0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in mean scores in females, patients aged ≤50 years, patients without a history of previous NCS, and patients without comorbidities (all p-values<0.05). Median scores using nonparametric Wilcoxon ranked test also showed statistically significant differences (all p-values<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that topical lidocaine 2% gel reduces discomfort associated with NCS. However, despite the statistical significance, clear clinical significance may be lacking. Clinical implementation may be considered for the subgroups that showed the greatest benefit. Further studies that incorporate more efficient drug delivery methods may yield better results. Dove 2023-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10543085/ /pubmed/37791113 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426076 Text en © 2023 Al-Hayk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Al-Hayk, Kefah
Smadi, Mahmoud M
Elsalem, Lina M
Yassin, Ahmed
Aqaileh, Suha
Obiedat, Deema H
Al-Hayk, Ahmad Kefah
Al Qawasmeh, Majdi
Kofahi, Raid
El-Salem, Khalid
Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
title Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
title_full Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
title_fullStr Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
title_short Effect of 2% Topical Lidocaine Gel on Discomfort from Electrical Stimulation During Nerve Conduction Studies- A Prospective Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study
title_sort effect of 2% topical lidocaine gel on discomfort from electrical stimulation during nerve conduction studies- a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791113
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S426076
work_keys_str_mv AT alhaykkefah effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT smadimahmoudm effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT elsalemlinam effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT yassinahmed effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT aqailehsuha effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT obiedatdeemah effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT alhaykahmadkefah effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT alqawasmehmajdi effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT kofahiraid effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy
AT elsalemkhalid effectof2topicallidocainegelondiscomfortfromelectricalstimulationduringnerveconductionstudiesaprospectivedoubleblindplacebocontrolledstudy