Cargando…

Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore how decision making and informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged in the clinical learning environment (CLE) during the height of the Covid‐19 pandemic. The authors’ specific interest was to better understand the IIL that took place among frontl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaid, Urvashi, Lundgren, Henriette, Watkins, Karen E., Ziring, Deborah, Alcid, Grace A., Marsick, Victoria J., Papanagnou, Dimitrios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10909
_version_ 1785114229286633472
author Vaid, Urvashi
Lundgren, Henriette
Watkins, Karen E.
Ziring, Deborah
Alcid, Grace A.
Marsick, Victoria J.
Papanagnou, Dimitrios
author_facet Vaid, Urvashi
Lundgren, Henriette
Watkins, Karen E.
Ziring, Deborah
Alcid, Grace A.
Marsick, Victoria J.
Papanagnou, Dimitrios
author_sort Vaid, Urvashi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore how decision making and informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged in the clinical learning environment (CLE) during the height of the Covid‐19 pandemic. The authors’ specific interest was to better understand the IIL that took place among frontline physicians who had to navigate a CLE replete with uncertainty and complexity with the future goal of creating experiences for medical students that would simulate IIL and use uncertainty as a catalyst for learning. METHOD: Using a modified constructivist, grounded theory approach, we describe physicians’ IIL while working during times of heightened uncertainty. Using the critical incident technique, we conducted 45‐min virtual interviews with seven emergency department (ED) and five intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, who worked during the height of the pandemic. The authors transcribed and restoried each interview before applying inductive, comparative analysis to identify patterns, assertions, and organizing themes. RESULTS: Findings showed that the burden of decision making for physicians was influenced by the physical, emotional, relational, and situational context of the CLE. The themes that emerged for decision making and IIL were interdependent. Prominent among the patterns for decision making were ways to simplify the problem by applying prior knowledge, using pattern recognition, and cross‐checking with team members. Patterns for IIL emerged through trial and error, which included thoughtful experimentation, consulting alternative sources of information, accumulating knowledge, and “poking at the periphery” of clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Complexity and uncertainty are rife in clinical practice and this study made visible decision‐making patterns and IIL approaches that can be built into formal curricula. Making implicit uncertainty explicit by recognizing it, naming it, and practicing navigating it may better prepare learners for the uncertainty posed by the clinical practice environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10543116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105431162023-10-03 Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19 Vaid, Urvashi Lundgren, Henriette Watkins, Karen E. Ziring, Deborah Alcid, Grace A. Marsick, Victoria J. Papanagnou, Dimitrios AEM Educ Train Original Contribution PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore how decision making and informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged in the clinical learning environment (CLE) during the height of the Covid‐19 pandemic. The authors’ specific interest was to better understand the IIL that took place among frontline physicians who had to navigate a CLE replete with uncertainty and complexity with the future goal of creating experiences for medical students that would simulate IIL and use uncertainty as a catalyst for learning. METHOD: Using a modified constructivist, grounded theory approach, we describe physicians’ IIL while working during times of heightened uncertainty. Using the critical incident technique, we conducted 45‐min virtual interviews with seven emergency department (ED) and five intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, who worked during the height of the pandemic. The authors transcribed and restoried each interview before applying inductive, comparative analysis to identify patterns, assertions, and organizing themes. RESULTS: Findings showed that the burden of decision making for physicians was influenced by the physical, emotional, relational, and situational context of the CLE. The themes that emerged for decision making and IIL were interdependent. Prominent among the patterns for decision making were ways to simplify the problem by applying prior knowledge, using pattern recognition, and cross‐checking with team members. Patterns for IIL emerged through trial and error, which included thoughtful experimentation, consulting alternative sources of information, accumulating knowledge, and “poking at the periphery” of clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Complexity and uncertainty are rife in clinical practice and this study made visible decision‐making patterns and IIL approaches that can be built into formal curricula. Making implicit uncertainty explicit by recognizing it, naming it, and practicing navigating it may better prepare learners for the uncertainty posed by the clinical practice environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10543116/ /pubmed/37791137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10909 Text en © 2023 The Authors. AEM Education and Training published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Vaid, Urvashi
Lundgren, Henriette
Watkins, Karen E.
Ziring, Deborah
Alcid, Grace A.
Marsick, Victoria J.
Papanagnou, Dimitrios
Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19
title Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19
title_full Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19
title_fullStr Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19
title_full_unstemmed Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19
title_short Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19
title_sort making decisions “in the dark”: learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during covid‐19
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10909
work_keys_str_mv AT vaidurvashi makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19
AT lundgrenhenriette makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19
AT watkinskarene makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19
AT ziringdeborah makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19
AT alcidgracea makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19
AT marsickvictoriaj makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19
AT papanagnoudimitrios makingdecisionsinthedarklearningthroughuncertaintyinclinicalpracticeduringcovid19