Cargando…

Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis

IMPORTANCE: Efforts to quantify the burden of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis have been limited by inconsistent definitions and underrecognition of viral sepsis. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis using objective electronic cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shappell, Claire N., Klompas, Michael, Chan, Christina, Chen, Tom, Kanjilal, Sanjat, McKenna, Caroline, Rhee, Chanu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35728
_version_ 1785114229776318464
author Shappell, Claire N.
Klompas, Michael
Chan, Christina
Chen, Tom
Kanjilal, Sanjat
McKenna, Caroline
Rhee, Chanu
author_facet Shappell, Claire N.
Klompas, Michael
Chan, Christina
Chen, Tom
Kanjilal, Sanjat
McKenna, Caroline
Rhee, Chanu
author_sort Shappell, Claire N.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Efforts to quantify the burden of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis have been limited by inconsistent definitions and underrecognition of viral sepsis. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis using objective electronic clinical criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adults hospitalized at 5 Massachusetts hospitals between March 2020 and November 2022. EXPOSURES: SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test and concurrent organ dysfunction (ie, oxygen support above simple nasal cannula, vasopressors, elevated lactate level, rise in creatine or bilirubin level, and/or decline in platelets). Presumed bacterial sepsis was defined by modified US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention adult sepsis event criteria (ie, blood culture order, sustained treatment with antibiotics, and organ dysfunction using identical thresholds as for SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Trends in the quarterly incidence (ie, proportion of hospitalizations) and in-hospital mortality for SARS-CoV-2–associated and presumed bacterial sepsis were assessed using negative binomial and logistic regression models. RESULTS: This study included 431 017 hospital encounters from 261 595 individuals (mean [SD] age 57.9 [19.8] years, 241 131 (55.9%) females, 286 397 [66.5%] from academic hospital site). Of these encounters, 23 276 (5.4%) were from SARS-CoV-2, 6558 (1.5%) had SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis, and 30 604 patients (7.1%) had presumed bacterial sepsis without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Crude in-hospital mortality for SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis declined from 490 of 1469 (33.4%) in the first quarter to 67 of 450 (14.9%) in the last (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.90] per quarter). Crude mortality for presumed bacterial sepsis was 4451 of 30 604 patients (14.5%) and stable across quarters (aOR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.01]). Medical record reviews of 200 SARS-CoV-2–positive hospitalizations confirmed electronic health record (EHR)–based SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis criteria performed well relative to sepsis-3 criteria (90.6% [95% CI, 80.7%-96.5%] sensitivity; 91.2% [95% CI, 85.1%-95.4%] specificity). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults, SARS-CoV-2 accounted for approximately 1 in 6 cases of sepsis during the first 33 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. In-hospital mortality rates for SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis were high but declined over time and ultimately were similar to presumed bacterial sepsis. These findings highlight the high burden of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis and demonstrate the utility of EHR-based algorithms to conduct surveillance for viral and bacterial sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10543118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105431182023-10-03 Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis Shappell, Claire N. Klompas, Michael Chan, Christina Chen, Tom Kanjilal, Sanjat McKenna, Caroline Rhee, Chanu JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Efforts to quantify the burden of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis have been limited by inconsistent definitions and underrecognition of viral sepsis. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis vs presumed bacterial sepsis using objective electronic clinical criteria. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study included adults hospitalized at 5 Massachusetts hospitals between March 2020 and November 2022. EXPOSURES: SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test and concurrent organ dysfunction (ie, oxygen support above simple nasal cannula, vasopressors, elevated lactate level, rise in creatine or bilirubin level, and/or decline in platelets). Presumed bacterial sepsis was defined by modified US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention adult sepsis event criteria (ie, blood culture order, sustained treatment with antibiotics, and organ dysfunction using identical thresholds as for SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Trends in the quarterly incidence (ie, proportion of hospitalizations) and in-hospital mortality for SARS-CoV-2–associated and presumed bacterial sepsis were assessed using negative binomial and logistic regression models. RESULTS: This study included 431 017 hospital encounters from 261 595 individuals (mean [SD] age 57.9 [19.8] years, 241 131 (55.9%) females, 286 397 [66.5%] from academic hospital site). Of these encounters, 23 276 (5.4%) were from SARS-CoV-2, 6558 (1.5%) had SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis, and 30 604 patients (7.1%) had presumed bacterial sepsis without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Crude in-hospital mortality for SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis declined from 490 of 1469 (33.4%) in the first quarter to 67 of 450 (14.9%) in the last (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.90] per quarter). Crude mortality for presumed bacterial sepsis was 4451 of 30 604 patients (14.5%) and stable across quarters (aOR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.01]). Medical record reviews of 200 SARS-CoV-2–positive hospitalizations confirmed electronic health record (EHR)–based SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis criteria performed well relative to sepsis-3 criteria (90.6% [95% CI, 80.7%-96.5%] sensitivity; 91.2% [95% CI, 85.1%-95.4%] specificity). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this retrospective cohort study of hospitalized adults, SARS-CoV-2 accounted for approximately 1 in 6 cases of sepsis during the first 33 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. In-hospital mortality rates for SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis were high but declined over time and ultimately were similar to presumed bacterial sepsis. These findings highlight the high burden of SARS-CoV-2–associated sepsis and demonstrate the utility of EHR-based algorithms to conduct surveillance for viral and bacterial sepsis. American Medical Association 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10543118/ /pubmed/37773495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35728 Text en Copyright 2023 Shappell CN et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Shappell, Claire N.
Klompas, Michael
Chan, Christina
Chen, Tom
Kanjilal, Sanjat
McKenna, Caroline
Rhee, Chanu
Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis
title Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis
title_full Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis
title_fullStr Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis
title_short Use of Electronic Clinical Data to Track Incidence and Mortality for SARS-CoV-2–Associated Sepsis
title_sort use of electronic clinical data to track incidence and mortality for sars-cov-2–associated sepsis
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35728
work_keys_str_mv AT shappellclairen useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis
AT klompasmichael useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis
AT chanchristina useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis
AT chentom useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis
AT kanjilalsanjat useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis
AT mckennacaroline useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis
AT rheechanu useofelectronicclinicaldatatotrackincidenceandmortalityforsarscov2associatedsepsis