Cargando…

Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework

BACKGROUND: Use of combinations of long-acting β(2) agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Nevertheless, existing evidence on cardiovascular risk associated with LABA/LAMA versus another dual combination, L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chun-Yu, Pan, Sheng-Wei, Hsu, Chia-Chen, Liu, Jason J., Kumamaru, Hiraku, Dong, Yaa-Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9
_version_ 1785114271958433792
author Chen, Chun-Yu
Pan, Sheng-Wei
Hsu, Chia-Chen
Liu, Jason J.
Kumamaru, Hiraku
Dong, Yaa-Hui
author_facet Chen, Chun-Yu
Pan, Sheng-Wei
Hsu, Chia-Chen
Liu, Jason J.
Kumamaru, Hiraku
Dong, Yaa-Hui
author_sort Chen, Chun-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Use of combinations of long-acting β(2) agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Nevertheless, existing evidence on cardiovascular risk associated with LABA/LAMA versus another dual combination, LABA/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), was limited and discrepant. AIM: The present cohort study aimed to examine comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS with a target trial emulation framework, focusing on dual fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapies. METHODS: We identified patients with COPD who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC from a nationwide Taiwanese database during 2017–2020. The outcome of interest was a hospitalized composite cardiovascular events of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, and ischemic stroke. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for composite and individual cardiovascular events after matching up to five LABA/LAMA FDC initiators to one LABA/ICS FDC initiator using propensity scores (PS). RESULTS: Among 75,926 PS-matched patients, use of LABA/LAMA FDC did not show a higher cardiovascular risk compared to use of LABA/ICS FDC, with a HR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78–1.01) for the composite events, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61–1.05) for acute myocardial infarction, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.68–3.25) for unstable angina, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.80–1.24) for congestive heart failure, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.37–1.05) for cardiac dysrhythmia, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02) for ischemic stroke. The results did not vary substantially in several pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide important reassurance about comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC treatment among patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10543303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105433032023-10-03 Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework Chen, Chun-Yu Pan, Sheng-Wei Hsu, Chia-Chen Liu, Jason J. Kumamaru, Hiraku Dong, Yaa-Hui Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Use of combinations of long-acting β(2) agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Nevertheless, existing evidence on cardiovascular risk associated with LABA/LAMA versus another dual combination, LABA/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), was limited and discrepant. AIM: The present cohort study aimed to examine comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS with a target trial emulation framework, focusing on dual fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapies. METHODS: We identified patients with COPD who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC from a nationwide Taiwanese database during 2017–2020. The outcome of interest was a hospitalized composite cardiovascular events of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, and ischemic stroke. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for composite and individual cardiovascular events after matching up to five LABA/LAMA FDC initiators to one LABA/ICS FDC initiator using propensity scores (PS). RESULTS: Among 75,926 PS-matched patients, use of LABA/LAMA FDC did not show a higher cardiovascular risk compared to use of LABA/ICS FDC, with a HR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78–1.01) for the composite events, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61–1.05) for acute myocardial infarction, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.68–3.25) for unstable angina, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.80–1.24) for congestive heart failure, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.37–1.05) for cardiac dysrhythmia, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02) for ischemic stroke. The results did not vary substantially in several pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide important reassurance about comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC treatment among patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10543303/ /pubmed/37775734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Chun-Yu
Pan, Sheng-Wei
Hsu, Chia-Chen
Liu, Jason J.
Kumamaru, Hiraku
Dong, Yaa-Hui
Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
title Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
title_full Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
title_fullStr Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
title_short Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
title_sort comparative cardiovascular safety of laba/lama fdc versus laba/ics fdc in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchunyu comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework
AT panshengwei comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework
AT hsuchiachen comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework
AT liujasonj comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework
AT kumamaruhiraku comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework
AT dongyaahui comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework