Cargando…
Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework
BACKGROUND: Use of combinations of long-acting β(2) agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Nevertheless, existing evidence on cardiovascular risk associated with LABA/LAMA versus another dual combination, L...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9 |
_version_ | 1785114271958433792 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Chun-Yu Pan, Sheng-Wei Hsu, Chia-Chen Liu, Jason J. Kumamaru, Hiraku Dong, Yaa-Hui |
author_facet | Chen, Chun-Yu Pan, Sheng-Wei Hsu, Chia-Chen Liu, Jason J. Kumamaru, Hiraku Dong, Yaa-Hui |
author_sort | Chen, Chun-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Use of combinations of long-acting β(2) agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Nevertheless, existing evidence on cardiovascular risk associated with LABA/LAMA versus another dual combination, LABA/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), was limited and discrepant. AIM: The present cohort study aimed to examine comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS with a target trial emulation framework, focusing on dual fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapies. METHODS: We identified patients with COPD who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC from a nationwide Taiwanese database during 2017–2020. The outcome of interest was a hospitalized composite cardiovascular events of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, and ischemic stroke. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for composite and individual cardiovascular events after matching up to five LABA/LAMA FDC initiators to one LABA/ICS FDC initiator using propensity scores (PS). RESULTS: Among 75,926 PS-matched patients, use of LABA/LAMA FDC did not show a higher cardiovascular risk compared to use of LABA/ICS FDC, with a HR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78–1.01) for the composite events, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61–1.05) for acute myocardial infarction, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.68–3.25) for unstable angina, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.80–1.24) for congestive heart failure, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.37–1.05) for cardiac dysrhythmia, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02) for ischemic stroke. The results did not vary substantially in several pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide important reassurance about comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC treatment among patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10543303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105433032023-10-03 Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework Chen, Chun-Yu Pan, Sheng-Wei Hsu, Chia-Chen Liu, Jason J. Kumamaru, Hiraku Dong, Yaa-Hui Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Use of combinations of long-acting β(2) agonists/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LABA/LAMA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing. Nevertheless, existing evidence on cardiovascular risk associated with LABA/LAMA versus another dual combination, LABA/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), was limited and discrepant. AIM: The present cohort study aimed to examine comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS with a target trial emulation framework, focusing on dual fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapies. METHODS: We identified patients with COPD who initiated LABA/LAMA FDC or LABA/ICS FDC from a nationwide Taiwanese database during 2017–2020. The outcome of interest was a hospitalized composite cardiovascular events of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, cardiac dysrhythmia, and ischemic stroke. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for composite and individual cardiovascular events after matching up to five LABA/LAMA FDC initiators to one LABA/ICS FDC initiator using propensity scores (PS). RESULTS: Among 75,926 PS-matched patients, use of LABA/LAMA FDC did not show a higher cardiovascular risk compared to use of LABA/ICS FDC, with a HR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78–1.01) for the composite events, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61–1.05) for acute myocardial infarction, 1.48 (95% CI, 0.68–3.25) for unstable angina, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.80–1.24) for congestive heart failure, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.37–1.05) for cardiac dysrhythmia, and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66–1.02) for ischemic stroke. The results did not vary substantially in several pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide important reassurance about comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC treatment among patients with COPD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10543303/ /pubmed/37775734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Chun-Yu Pan, Sheng-Wei Hsu, Chia-Chen Liu, Jason J. Kumamaru, Hiraku Dong, Yaa-Hui Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
title | Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
title_full | Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
title_fullStr | Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
title_short | Comparative cardiovascular safety of LABA/LAMA FDC versus LABA/ICS FDC in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
title_sort | comparative cardiovascular safety of laba/lama fdc versus laba/ics fdc in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population-based cohort study with a target trial emulation framework |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02545-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenchunyu comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework AT panshengwei comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework AT hsuchiachen comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework AT liujasonj comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework AT kumamaruhiraku comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework AT dongyaahui comparativecardiovascularsafetyoflabalamafdcversuslabaicsfdcinpatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseapopulationbasedcohortstudywithatargettrialemulationframework |