Cargando…

Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU death. In recognition of the burden of sepsis, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed sepsis “bundles” (goals to accomplish over a specific time period) to facil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frank, Hannah E., Evans, Laura, Phillips, Gary, Dellinger, RPhillip, Goldstein, Jessyca, Harmon, Lori, Portelli, David, Sarani, Nima, Schorr, Christa, Terry, Kathleen M., Townsend, Sean R., Levy, Mitchell M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y
_version_ 1785114275244670976
author Frank, Hannah E.
Evans, Laura
Phillips, Gary
Dellinger, RPhillip
Goldstein, Jessyca
Harmon, Lori
Portelli, David
Sarani, Nima
Schorr, Christa
Terry, Kathleen M.
Townsend, Sean R.
Levy, Mitchell M.
author_facet Frank, Hannah E.
Evans, Laura
Phillips, Gary
Dellinger, RPhillip
Goldstein, Jessyca
Harmon, Lori
Portelli, David
Sarani, Nima
Schorr, Christa
Terry, Kathleen M.
Townsend, Sean R.
Levy, Mitchell M.
author_sort Frank, Hannah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU death. In recognition of the burden of sepsis, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed sepsis “bundles” (goals to accomplish over a specific time period) to facilitate SSC guideline implementation in clinical practice. Using the SSC 3-h bundle as a base, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a 3-h sepsis bundle that has become the national standard for early management of sepsis. Emerging observational data, from an analysis conducted for the AIMS grant application, suggest there may be additional mortality benefit from even earlier implementation of the 3-h bundle, i.e., the 1-h bundle. METHOD: The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to: (1) examine the effect on clinical outcomes of Emergency Department initiation of the elements of the 3-h bundle within the traditional 3 h versus initiating within 1 h of sepsis recognition and (2) examine the extent to which a rigorous implementation strategy will improve implementation and compliance with both the 1-h bundle and the 3-h bundle. This study will be entirely conducted in the Emergency Department at 18 sites. A secondary aim is to identify clinical sepsis phenotypes and their impact on treatment outcomes. DISCUSSION: This cluster-randomized trial, employing implementation science methodology, is timely and important to the field. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design is likely to have an impact on clinical practice in sepsis management by providing a rigorous evaluation of the 1- and 3-h bundles. FUNDING: NHLBI R01HL162954. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05491941. Registered on August 8, 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10543317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105433172023-10-03 Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial Frank, Hannah E. Evans, Laura Phillips, Gary Dellinger, RPhillip Goldstein, Jessyca Harmon, Lori Portelli, David Sarani, Nima Schorr, Christa Terry, Kathleen M. Townsend, Sean R. Levy, Mitchell M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Sepsis is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU death. In recognition of the burden of sepsis, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed sepsis “bundles” (goals to accomplish over a specific time period) to facilitate SSC guideline implementation in clinical practice. Using the SSC 3-h bundle as a base, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a 3-h sepsis bundle that has become the national standard for early management of sepsis. Emerging observational data, from an analysis conducted for the AIMS grant application, suggest there may be additional mortality benefit from even earlier implementation of the 3-h bundle, i.e., the 1-h bundle. METHOD: The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to: (1) examine the effect on clinical outcomes of Emergency Department initiation of the elements of the 3-h bundle within the traditional 3 h versus initiating within 1 h of sepsis recognition and (2) examine the extent to which a rigorous implementation strategy will improve implementation and compliance with both the 1-h bundle and the 3-h bundle. This study will be entirely conducted in the Emergency Department at 18 sites. A secondary aim is to identify clinical sepsis phenotypes and their impact on treatment outcomes. DISCUSSION: This cluster-randomized trial, employing implementation science methodology, is timely and important to the field. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design is likely to have an impact on clinical practice in sepsis management by providing a rigorous evaluation of the 1- and 3-h bundles. FUNDING: NHLBI R01HL162954. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05491941. Registered on August 8, 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y. BioMed Central 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10543317/ /pubmed/37773067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Frank, Hannah E.
Evans, Laura
Phillips, Gary
Dellinger, RPhillip
Goldstein, Jessyca
Harmon, Lori
Portelli, David
Sarani, Nima
Schorr, Christa
Terry, Kathleen M.
Townsend, Sean R.
Levy, Mitchell M.
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
title Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
title_full Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
title_fullStr Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
title_short Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
title_sort assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y
work_keys_str_mv AT frankhannahe assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT evanslaura assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT phillipsgary assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT dellingerrphillip assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT goldsteinjessyca assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT harmonlori assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT portellidavid assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT saraninima assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT schorrchrista assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT terrykathleenm assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT townsendseanr assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial
AT levymitchellm assessmentofimplementationmethodsinsepsisstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedhybridtype2trial