Cargando…

A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England

BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) was commissioned by NHS England in 2016 and rolled out in three ‘waves’ across the whole of England. It aims to help people with raised blood glucose levels reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through behavio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunton, Lisa, Soiland-Reyes, Claudia, Wilson, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y
_version_ 1785114374101270528
author Brunton, Lisa
Soiland-Reyes, Claudia
Wilson, Paul
author_facet Brunton, Lisa
Soiland-Reyes, Claudia
Wilson, Paul
author_sort Brunton, Lisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) was commissioned by NHS England in 2016 and rolled out in three ‘waves’ across the whole of England. It aims to help people with raised blood glucose levels reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through behaviour change techniques (e.g., weight loss, dietary changes and exercise). An independent, longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of the NHS DPP was undertaken. We report the findings from the implementation work package: a qualitative interview study with designated local leads, responsible for the local commissioning and implementation of the programme. The aim of the study was to explore how local implementation processes were enacted and adapted over time. METHODS: We conducted a telephone interview study across two time-points. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews with local leads across 19 sampled case sites were undertaken between October 2019 and January 2020 and 13 interviews with local leads across 13 sampled case sites were conducted between July 2020 and August 2020. Interviews aimed to reflect on the experience of implementation and explore how things changed over time. RESULTS: We identified four overarching themes to show how implementation was locally enacted and adapted across the sampled case sites: 1. Adapting to provider change; 2. Identification and referral; 3. Enhancing uptake in underserved populations; and 4. Digital and remote service options. CONCLUSION: This paper reports how designated local leads, responsible for local implementation of the NHS DPP, adapted implementation efforts over the course of a changing national diabetes prevention programme, including how local leads adapted implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper highlights three main factors that influence implementation: the importance of facilitation, the ability (or not) to tailor interventions to local needs and the role of context in implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10543852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105438522023-10-03 A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England Brunton, Lisa Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Wilson, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) was commissioned by NHS England in 2016 and rolled out in three ‘waves’ across the whole of England. It aims to help people with raised blood glucose levels reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through behaviour change techniques (e.g., weight loss, dietary changes and exercise). An independent, longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of the NHS DPP was undertaken. We report the findings from the implementation work package: a qualitative interview study with designated local leads, responsible for the local commissioning and implementation of the programme. The aim of the study was to explore how local implementation processes were enacted and adapted over time. METHODS: We conducted a telephone interview study across two time-points. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews with local leads across 19 sampled case sites were undertaken between October 2019 and January 2020 and 13 interviews with local leads across 13 sampled case sites were conducted between July 2020 and August 2020. Interviews aimed to reflect on the experience of implementation and explore how things changed over time. RESULTS: We identified four overarching themes to show how implementation was locally enacted and adapted across the sampled case sites: 1. Adapting to provider change; 2. Identification and referral; 3. Enhancing uptake in underserved populations; and 4. Digital and remote service options. CONCLUSION: This paper reports how designated local leads, responsible for local implementation of the NHS DPP, adapted implementation efforts over the course of a changing national diabetes prevention programme, including how local leads adapted implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper highlights three main factors that influence implementation: the importance of facilitation, the ability (or not) to tailor interventions to local needs and the role of context in implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y. BioMed Central 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10543852/ /pubmed/37773125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brunton, Lisa
Soiland-Reyes, Claudia
Wilson, Paul
A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
title A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
title_full A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
title_fullStr A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
title_short A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
title_sort qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in england
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bruntonlisa aqualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland
AT soilandreyesclaudia aqualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland
AT wilsonpaul aqualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland
AT bruntonlisa qualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland
AT soilandreyesclaudia qualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland
AT wilsonpaul qualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland