Cargando…
A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England
BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) was commissioned by NHS England in 2016 and rolled out in three ‘waves’ across the whole of England. It aims to help people with raised blood glucose levels reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through behavio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y |
_version_ | 1785114374101270528 |
---|---|
author | Brunton, Lisa Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Wilson, Paul |
author_facet | Brunton, Lisa Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Wilson, Paul |
author_sort | Brunton, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) was commissioned by NHS England in 2016 and rolled out in three ‘waves’ across the whole of England. It aims to help people with raised blood glucose levels reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through behaviour change techniques (e.g., weight loss, dietary changes and exercise). An independent, longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of the NHS DPP was undertaken. We report the findings from the implementation work package: a qualitative interview study with designated local leads, responsible for the local commissioning and implementation of the programme. The aim of the study was to explore how local implementation processes were enacted and adapted over time. METHODS: We conducted a telephone interview study across two time-points. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews with local leads across 19 sampled case sites were undertaken between October 2019 and January 2020 and 13 interviews with local leads across 13 sampled case sites were conducted between July 2020 and August 2020. Interviews aimed to reflect on the experience of implementation and explore how things changed over time. RESULTS: We identified four overarching themes to show how implementation was locally enacted and adapted across the sampled case sites: 1. Adapting to provider change; 2. Identification and referral; 3. Enhancing uptake in underserved populations; and 4. Digital and remote service options. CONCLUSION: This paper reports how designated local leads, responsible for local implementation of the NHS DPP, adapted implementation efforts over the course of a changing national diabetes prevention programme, including how local leads adapted implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper highlights three main factors that influence implementation: the importance of facilitation, the ability (or not) to tailor interventions to local needs and the role of context in implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10543852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105438522023-10-03 A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England Brunton, Lisa Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Wilson, Paul BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) was commissioned by NHS England in 2016 and rolled out in three ‘waves’ across the whole of England. It aims to help people with raised blood glucose levels reduce their risk of developing type 2 diabetes through behaviour change techniques (e.g., weight loss, dietary changes and exercise). An independent, longitudinal, mixed methods evaluation of the NHS DPP was undertaken. We report the findings from the implementation work package: a qualitative interview study with designated local leads, responsible for the local commissioning and implementation of the programme. The aim of the study was to explore how local implementation processes were enacted and adapted over time. METHODS: We conducted a telephone interview study across two time-points. Twenty-four semi-structured interviews with local leads across 19 sampled case sites were undertaken between October 2019 and January 2020 and 13 interviews with local leads across 13 sampled case sites were conducted between July 2020 and August 2020. Interviews aimed to reflect on the experience of implementation and explore how things changed over time. RESULTS: We identified four overarching themes to show how implementation was locally enacted and adapted across the sampled case sites: 1. Adapting to provider change; 2. Identification and referral; 3. Enhancing uptake in underserved populations; and 4. Digital and remote service options. CONCLUSION: This paper reports how designated local leads, responsible for local implementation of the NHS DPP, adapted implementation efforts over the course of a changing national diabetes prevention programme, including how local leads adapted implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper highlights three main factors that influence implementation: the importance of facilitation, the ability (or not) to tailor interventions to local needs and the role of context in implementation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y. BioMed Central 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10543852/ /pubmed/37773125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brunton, Lisa Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Wilson, Paul A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England |
title | A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England |
title_full | A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England |
title_fullStr | A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England |
title_short | A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England |
title_sort | qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in england |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10543852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10002-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruntonlisa aqualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland AT soilandreyesclaudia aqualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland AT wilsonpaul aqualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland AT bruntonlisa qualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland AT soilandreyesclaudia qualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland AT wilsonpaul qualitativeevaluationofthenationalrolloutofadiabetespreventionprogrammeinengland |