Cargando…

The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization

Assessment tools, such as the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX), have been developed to evaluate the competence of medical trainees during routine duties. However, their effectiveness in busy environments, such as the emergency department (ED), is poorly understood. This study assesses th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaki, Hany A, Yigit, Yavuz, Shaban, Eman, Shaban, Ahmed E, Elmoheen, Amr, Bashir, Khalid, Basharat, Kaleem, Ali, Mohamed, Hamdi Alkahlout, Baha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791168
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44443
_version_ 1785114417642340352
author Zaki, Hany A
Yigit, Yavuz
Shaban, Eman
Shaban, Ahmed E
Elmoheen, Amr
Bashir, Khalid
Basharat, Kaleem
Ali, Mohamed
Hamdi Alkahlout, Baha
author_facet Zaki, Hany A
Yigit, Yavuz
Shaban, Eman
Shaban, Ahmed E
Elmoheen, Amr
Bashir, Khalid
Basharat, Kaleem
Ali, Mohamed
Hamdi Alkahlout, Baha
author_sort Zaki, Hany A
collection PubMed
description Assessment tools, such as the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX), have been developed to evaluate the competence of medical trainees during routine duties. However, their effectiveness in busy environments, such as the emergency department (ED), is poorly understood. This study assesses the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of implementing the mini-CEX in the ED. PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were scoured for observational and randomized trials related to our topic. Moreover, a manual search was also conducted to identify additional studies. After the literature search, data were extracted from studies that were eligible for inclusion by two independent reviewers. When applicable, meta-analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. In addition, the methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of the 2,105 articles gathered through database and manual searches, only four met the criteria for inclusion in the review. A combined analysis of three studies revealed that trainee-patient interactions averaged 16.05 minutes (95% CI = 14.21-17.88), and feedback was given in about 10.78 minutes (95% CI = 10.19-11.38). The completion rates for mini-CEX were high: 95.7% (95% CI = 87.6-98.6) for medical trainees and 95.8% (95% CI = 89.7-98.3) for assessors. Satisfaction with mini-CEX was notable, with 63.5% (95% CI = 51.5-74.1) of medical trainees and 75.7% (95% CI = 63.9-84.6) of assessors expressing contentment. Qualitative data from one study demonstrated that 70.6% of faculty members could allocate suitable time for mini-CEX during their clinical shifts. The mini-CEX is a feasible and acceptable assessment tool within the ED. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that it might be reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10544045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105440452023-10-03 The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization Zaki, Hany A Yigit, Yavuz Shaban, Eman Shaban, Ahmed E Elmoheen, Amr Bashir, Khalid Basharat, Kaleem Ali, Mohamed Hamdi Alkahlout, Baha Cureus Emergency Medicine Assessment tools, such as the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX), have been developed to evaluate the competence of medical trainees during routine duties. However, their effectiveness in busy environments, such as the emergency department (ED), is poorly understood. This study assesses the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of implementing the mini-CEX in the ED. PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were scoured for observational and randomized trials related to our topic. Moreover, a manual search was also conducted to identify additional studies. After the literature search, data were extracted from studies that were eligible for inclusion by two independent reviewers. When applicable, meta-analyses were performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. In addition, the methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of the 2,105 articles gathered through database and manual searches, only four met the criteria for inclusion in the review. A combined analysis of three studies revealed that trainee-patient interactions averaged 16.05 minutes (95% CI = 14.21-17.88), and feedback was given in about 10.78 minutes (95% CI = 10.19-11.38). The completion rates for mini-CEX were high: 95.7% (95% CI = 87.6-98.6) for medical trainees and 95.8% (95% CI = 89.7-98.3) for assessors. Satisfaction with mini-CEX was notable, with 63.5% (95% CI = 51.5-74.1) of medical trainees and 75.7% (95% CI = 63.9-84.6) of assessors expressing contentment. Qualitative data from one study demonstrated that 70.6% of faculty members could allocate suitable time for mini-CEX during their clinical shifts. The mini-CEX is a feasible and acceptable assessment tool within the ED. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that it might be reliable. Cureus 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10544045/ /pubmed/37791168 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44443 Text en Copyright © 2023, Zaki et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Zaki, Hany A
Yigit, Yavuz
Shaban, Eman
Shaban, Ahmed E
Elmoheen, Amr
Bashir, Khalid
Basharat, Kaleem
Ali, Mohamed
Hamdi Alkahlout, Baha
The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization
title The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization
title_full The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization
title_fullStr The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization
title_full_unstemmed The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization
title_short The Utility of the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Readability, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Mini-CEX Utilization
title_sort utility of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-cex) in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the readability, feasibility, and acceptability of mini-cex utilization
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791168
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44443
work_keys_str_mv AT zakihanya theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT yigityavuz theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT shabaneman theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT shabanahmede theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT elmoheenamr theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT bashirkhalid theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT basharatkaleem theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT alimohamed theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT hamdialkahloutbaha theutilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT zakihanya utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT yigityavuz utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT shabaneman utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT shabanahmede utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT elmoheenamr utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT bashirkhalid utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT basharatkaleem utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT alimohamed utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization
AT hamdialkahloutbaha utilityoftheminiclinicalevaluationexerciseminicexintheemergencydepartmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisevaluatingthereadabilityfeasibilityandacceptabilityofminicexutilization