Cargando…

Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background Vitrectomy surgery is a painful and lengthy procedure. Therefore, administering sedation to reduce patient agitation provides both surgical comfort and hemodynamic stability. However, various complications can arise during the perioperative period depending on the sedation agent used. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuvvet Yoldaş, Tuba, Gümüş, Nevin Esra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790005
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46204
_version_ 1785114472256372736
author Kuvvet Yoldaş, Tuba
Gümüş, Nevin Esra
author_facet Kuvvet Yoldaş, Tuba
Gümüş, Nevin Esra
author_sort Kuvvet Yoldaş, Tuba
collection PubMed
description Background Vitrectomy surgery is a painful and lengthy procedure. Therefore, administering sedation to reduce patient agitation provides both surgical comfort and hemodynamic stability. However, various complications can arise during the perioperative period depending on the sedation agent used. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil sedation applications on patient hemodynamics and perioperative complications in vitrectomy surgery. Methods Our retrospective study included patients aged 18-70 who underwent vitrectomy surgery between 2021 and 2022 with complete file data and ASA scores of 1-3 after obtaining approval from our hospital's ethics committee. Patients were classified into two groups based on the sedation agent used: Group D for dexmedetomidine and Group R for remifentanil. Demographic data of patients, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values during perioperative monitoring, operation duration, and complications such as perioperative nausea, vomiting, and low saturation were recorded. The data of both groups were statistically evaluated, with p<0.05 values considered statistically significant. Results Because of missing data in 18 out of 58 patient files, these cases were excluded from the study. A total of 40 patients were included in the study, with 20 in Group D and 20 in Group R. The mean age of the patients was 64. Among them, 18 (45%) were male, and 22 (55%) were female. The mean operation duration was 61.8 ± 24.1 minutes in Group D and 56.3 ± 17.2 minutes in Group R. The heart rate in Group D was statistically significantly lower than in Group R, starting from the 20th minute of the perioperative period. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values. One case of bradycardia occurred in Group D, requiring intervention. Conclusion In vitrectomy surgery, both dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions can be used for sedation, but caution is advised regarding bradycardia in Group D. Anticipating potential complications with an experienced anesthesia team is crucial for both patient and surgical comfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10544285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105442852023-10-03 Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study Kuvvet Yoldaş, Tuba Gümüş, Nevin Esra Cureus Anesthesiology Background Vitrectomy surgery is a painful and lengthy procedure. Therefore, administering sedation to reduce patient agitation provides both surgical comfort and hemodynamic stability. However, various complications can arise during the perioperative period depending on the sedation agent used. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil sedation applications on patient hemodynamics and perioperative complications in vitrectomy surgery. Methods Our retrospective study included patients aged 18-70 who underwent vitrectomy surgery between 2021 and 2022 with complete file data and ASA scores of 1-3 after obtaining approval from our hospital's ethics committee. Patients were classified into two groups based on the sedation agent used: Group D for dexmedetomidine and Group R for remifentanil. Demographic data of patients, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values during perioperative monitoring, operation duration, and complications such as perioperative nausea, vomiting, and low saturation were recorded. The data of both groups were statistically evaluated, with p<0.05 values considered statistically significant. Results Because of missing data in 18 out of 58 patient files, these cases were excluded from the study. A total of 40 patients were included in the study, with 20 in Group D and 20 in Group R. The mean age of the patients was 64. Among them, 18 (45%) were male, and 22 (55%) were female. The mean operation duration was 61.8 ± 24.1 minutes in Group D and 56.3 ± 17.2 minutes in Group R. The heart rate in Group D was statistically significantly lower than in Group R, starting from the 20th minute of the perioperative period. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of mean arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, and bispectral index values. One case of bradycardia occurred in Group D, requiring intervention. Conclusion In vitrectomy surgery, both dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions can be used for sedation, but caution is advised regarding bradycardia in Group D. Anticipating potential complications with an experienced anesthesia team is crucial for both patient and surgical comfort. Cureus 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10544285/ /pubmed/37790005 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46204 Text en Copyright © 2023, Kuvvet Yoldaş et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Kuvvet Yoldaş, Tuba
Gümüş, Nevin Esra
Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_full Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_short Comparison of the Sedative Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Vitrectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study
title_sort comparison of the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in vitrectomy surgery: a retrospective study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37790005
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46204
work_keys_str_mv AT kuvvetyoldastuba comparisonofthesedativeeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilinvitrectomysurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT gumusnevinesra comparisonofthesedativeeffectsofdexmedetomidineandremifentanilinvitrectomysurgeryaretrospectivestudy