Cargando…
Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of wheat straw and different coffee husk (CHs) levels in pellet bedding on its quality, broiler chickens’ performance, meat quality, and welfare indicators. In total, 200 Ross 308 chickens were divided into 4 groups: C – control with wheat straw...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03749-3 |
_version_ | 1785114476050120704 |
---|---|
author | Biesek, Jakub Banaszak, Mirosław Wlaźlak, Sebastian Adamski, Marek |
author_facet | Biesek, Jakub Banaszak, Mirosław Wlaźlak, Sebastian Adamski, Marek |
author_sort | Biesek, Jakub |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of wheat straw and different coffee husk (CHs) levels in pellet bedding on its quality, broiler chickens’ performance, meat quality, and welfare indicators. In total, 200 Ross 308 chickens were divided into 4 groups: C – control with wheat straw pellet; CH10 – pellet with 10% CHs, CH25 – pellet with 25% CHs, and CH50 – pellet with 50% CHs. During 42 days of rearing, each bedding's physicochemical features were analyzed. The production results were controlled, and the footpad dermatitis, hock burns, and feather quality were assessed. From chosen birds, carcass composition was analyzed, as well as the qualitative features (color, water-holding capacity, drip loss) and breaking bone strength. RESULTS: The bedding material and rearing days influenced the content of dry matter, crude fiber, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, NDF, ADF, and pH. The results were inconclusive. The increasing trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content were noticed at the end of rearing. Strong coefficient determination in bedding features was found (0.580 – 0.986). The pellet with CHs had no adverse effect on the growth performance of broilers. In the CH50 group, a lower fat percentage was found. A beneficial effect on water-holding capacity was noticed in leg muscles from CH10 and pectoral muscles from CH25. A significant decrease was found in footpad dermatitis incidence in groups CH25 and CH50. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that CHs reuse in broilers as the pellet bedding material is possible due to the beneficial effect on some meat quality features and no adverse effect on the performance of broiler chickens. The positive impact on lower foot pad dermatitis incidence indicated the possibility of using CHs in pellet bedding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10544301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105443012023-10-03 Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens Biesek, Jakub Banaszak, Mirosław Wlaźlak, Sebastian Adamski, Marek BMC Vet Res Research BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of wheat straw and different coffee husk (CHs) levels in pellet bedding on its quality, broiler chickens’ performance, meat quality, and welfare indicators. In total, 200 Ross 308 chickens were divided into 4 groups: C – control with wheat straw pellet; CH10 – pellet with 10% CHs, CH25 – pellet with 25% CHs, and CH50 – pellet with 50% CHs. During 42 days of rearing, each bedding's physicochemical features were analyzed. The production results were controlled, and the footpad dermatitis, hock burns, and feather quality were assessed. From chosen birds, carcass composition was analyzed, as well as the qualitative features (color, water-holding capacity, drip loss) and breaking bone strength. RESULTS: The bedding material and rearing days influenced the content of dry matter, crude fiber, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, NDF, ADF, and pH. The results were inconclusive. The increasing trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content were noticed at the end of rearing. Strong coefficient determination in bedding features was found (0.580 – 0.986). The pellet with CHs had no adverse effect on the growth performance of broilers. In the CH50 group, a lower fat percentage was found. A beneficial effect on water-holding capacity was noticed in leg muscles from CH10 and pectoral muscles from CH25. A significant decrease was found in footpad dermatitis incidence in groups CH25 and CH50. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that CHs reuse in broilers as the pellet bedding material is possible due to the beneficial effect on some meat quality features and no adverse effect on the performance of broiler chickens. The positive impact on lower foot pad dermatitis incidence indicated the possibility of using CHs in pellet bedding. BioMed Central 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10544301/ /pubmed/37784147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03749-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Biesek, Jakub Banaszak, Mirosław Wlaźlak, Sebastian Adamski, Marek Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
title | Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
title_full | Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
title_fullStr | Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
title_short | Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
title_sort | use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03749-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biesekjakub useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens AT banaszakmirosław useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens AT wlazlaksebastian useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens AT adamskimarek useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens |