Cargando…

Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of wheat straw and different coffee husk (CHs) levels in pellet bedding on its quality, broiler chickens’ performance, meat quality, and welfare indicators. In total, 200 Ross 308 chickens were divided into 4 groups: C – control with wheat straw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biesek, Jakub, Banaszak, Mirosław, Wlaźlak, Sebastian, Adamski, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03749-3
_version_ 1785114476050120704
author Biesek, Jakub
Banaszak, Mirosław
Wlaźlak, Sebastian
Adamski, Marek
author_facet Biesek, Jakub
Banaszak, Mirosław
Wlaźlak, Sebastian
Adamski, Marek
author_sort Biesek, Jakub
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of wheat straw and different coffee husk (CHs) levels in pellet bedding on its quality, broiler chickens’ performance, meat quality, and welfare indicators. In total, 200 Ross 308 chickens were divided into 4 groups: C – control with wheat straw pellet; CH10 – pellet with 10% CHs, CH25 – pellet with 25% CHs, and CH50 – pellet with 50% CHs. During 42 days of rearing, each bedding's physicochemical features were analyzed. The production results were controlled, and the footpad dermatitis, hock burns, and feather quality were assessed. From chosen birds, carcass composition was analyzed, as well as the qualitative features (color, water-holding capacity, drip loss) and breaking bone strength. RESULTS: The bedding material and rearing days influenced the content of dry matter, crude fiber, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, NDF, ADF, and pH. The results were inconclusive. The increasing trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content were noticed at the end of rearing. Strong coefficient determination in bedding features was found (0.580 – 0.986). The pellet with CHs had no adverse effect on the growth performance of broilers. In the CH50 group, a lower fat percentage was found. A beneficial effect on water-holding capacity was noticed in leg muscles from CH10 and pectoral muscles from CH25. A significant decrease was found in footpad dermatitis incidence in groups CH25 and CH50. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that CHs reuse in broilers as the pellet bedding material is possible due to the beneficial effect on some meat quality features and no adverse effect on the performance of broiler chickens. The positive impact on lower foot pad dermatitis incidence indicated the possibility of using CHs in pellet bedding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10544301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105443012023-10-03 Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens Biesek, Jakub Banaszak, Mirosław Wlaźlak, Sebastian Adamski, Marek BMC Vet Res Research BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of wheat straw and different coffee husk (CHs) levels in pellet bedding on its quality, broiler chickens’ performance, meat quality, and welfare indicators. In total, 200 Ross 308 chickens were divided into 4 groups: C – control with wheat straw pellet; CH10 – pellet with 10% CHs, CH25 – pellet with 25% CHs, and CH50 – pellet with 50% CHs. During 42 days of rearing, each bedding's physicochemical features were analyzed. The production results were controlled, and the footpad dermatitis, hock burns, and feather quality were assessed. From chosen birds, carcass composition was analyzed, as well as the qualitative features (color, water-holding capacity, drip loss) and breaking bone strength. RESULTS: The bedding material and rearing days influenced the content of dry matter, crude fiber, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, NDF, ADF, and pH. The results were inconclusive. The increasing trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content were noticed at the end of rearing. Strong coefficient determination in bedding features was found (0.580 – 0.986). The pellet with CHs had no adverse effect on the growth performance of broilers. In the CH50 group, a lower fat percentage was found. A beneficial effect on water-holding capacity was noticed in leg muscles from CH10 and pectoral muscles from CH25. A significant decrease was found in footpad dermatitis incidence in groups CH25 and CH50. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that CHs reuse in broilers as the pellet bedding material is possible due to the beneficial effect on some meat quality features and no adverse effect on the performance of broiler chickens. The positive impact on lower foot pad dermatitis incidence indicated the possibility of using CHs in pellet bedding. BioMed Central 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10544301/ /pubmed/37784147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03749-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Biesek, Jakub
Banaszak, Mirosław
Wlaźlak, Sebastian
Adamski, Marek
Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
title Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
title_full Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
title_fullStr Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
title_short Use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
title_sort use of coffee husks – comparison of pellet bedding quality, performance features, and some welfare indicators of broiler chickens
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03749-3
work_keys_str_mv AT biesekjakub useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens
AT banaszakmirosław useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens
AT wlazlaksebastian useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens
AT adamskimarek useofcoffeehuskscomparisonofpelletbeddingqualityperformancefeaturesandsomewelfareindicatorsofbroilerchickens