Cargando…
Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol
BACKGROUND: Rural residents generally lack adequate physical activity to benefit health and reduce disparities in chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. The Socioecological Model describes physical activity as involving a dynamic and reciprocal interaction between indi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0 |
_version_ | 1785114507372134400 |
---|---|
author | Perry, Cynthia K Seguin-Fowler, Rebecca Maddock, Jay E. Lenstra, Noah Dieckmann, Nathan F. Currier, Jessica Andreyeva, Elena Winkle, Jim Trost, Stewart G. |
author_facet | Perry, Cynthia K Seguin-Fowler, Rebecca Maddock, Jay E. Lenstra, Noah Dieckmann, Nathan F. Currier, Jessica Andreyeva, Elena Winkle, Jim Trost, Stewart G. |
author_sort | Perry, Cynthia K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rural residents generally lack adequate physical activity to benefit health and reduce disparities in chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. The Socioecological Model describes physical activity as involving a dynamic and reciprocal interaction between individual, social, and community factors. Community group-based walking programs and civic engagement interventions aimed at enhancing physical activity have been successful in rural communities but have not targeted all three socioecological levels. Public libraries can act as innovative public health partners in rural communities. However, challenges remain because rural libraries often lack the capacity to implement evidence-based health promotion programming. The goals of this study are (1) build the capacity for rural libraries to implement evidence-based health promotion programs, (2) compare changes in physical activity between a group-based walking program and a combined group-based walking and civic engagement program with rural residents, and (3) conduct an implementation evaluation. METHODS: We will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of a group-based walking (standard approach) versus a group-based walking plus civic engagement program (combined approach) aimed at enhancing walkability to increase physical activity among rural adults. Key mediators between the program effects and change in outcomes will also be identified. Finally, we will evaluate program implementation, conduct a cost effectiveness evaluation, and use a positive deviance analysis to understand experiences of high and low changers on key outcomes. Twenty towns will be matched and randomized to one of the two conditions and our aim is to enroll a total of 350–400 rural residents (15–20 per town). Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months. DISCUSSION: This study will build the capacity of rural libraries to implement evidence-based walking programs as well as other health promotion programs in their communities. The study results will answer questions regarding the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two multilevel physical activity interventions targeting rural communities. We will learn what works and how these multilevel interventions can be implemented in rural populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05677906. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10544451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105444512023-10-03 Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol Perry, Cynthia K Seguin-Fowler, Rebecca Maddock, Jay E. Lenstra, Noah Dieckmann, Nathan F. Currier, Jessica Andreyeva, Elena Winkle, Jim Trost, Stewart G. BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Rural residents generally lack adequate physical activity to benefit health and reduce disparities in chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers. The Socioecological Model describes physical activity as involving a dynamic and reciprocal interaction between individual, social, and community factors. Community group-based walking programs and civic engagement interventions aimed at enhancing physical activity have been successful in rural communities but have not targeted all three socioecological levels. Public libraries can act as innovative public health partners in rural communities. However, challenges remain because rural libraries often lack the capacity to implement evidence-based health promotion programming. The goals of this study are (1) build the capacity for rural libraries to implement evidence-based health promotion programs, (2) compare changes in physical activity between a group-based walking program and a combined group-based walking and civic engagement program with rural residents, and (3) conduct an implementation evaluation. METHODS: We will conduct a comparative effectiveness study of a group-based walking (standard approach) versus a group-based walking plus civic engagement program (combined approach) aimed at enhancing walkability to increase physical activity among rural adults. Key mediators between the program effects and change in outcomes will also be identified. Finally, we will evaluate program implementation, conduct a cost effectiveness evaluation, and use a positive deviance analysis to understand experiences of high and low changers on key outcomes. Twenty towns will be matched and randomized to one of the two conditions and our aim is to enroll a total of 350–400 rural residents (15–20 per town). Study outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months. DISCUSSION: This study will build the capacity of rural libraries to implement evidence-based walking programs as well as other health promotion programs in their communities. The study results will answer questions regarding the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two multilevel physical activity interventions targeting rural communities. We will learn what works and how these multilevel interventions can be implemented in rural populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05677906. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0. BioMed Central 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10544451/ /pubmed/37784086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Perry, Cynthia K Seguin-Fowler, Rebecca Maddock, Jay E. Lenstra, Noah Dieckmann, Nathan F. Currier, Jessica Andreyeva, Elena Winkle, Jim Trost, Stewart G. Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
title | Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
title_full | Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
title_fullStr | Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
title_short | Rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
title_sort | rural libraries implementing walking groups or walking groups plus civic engagement for walkability in rural communities: a comparative effectiveness trial study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37784086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16788-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perrycynthiak rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT seguinfowlerrebecca rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT maddockjaye rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT lenstranoah rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT dieckmannnathanf rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT currierjessica rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT andreyevaelena rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT winklejim rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol AT troststewartg rurallibrariesimplementingwalkinggroupsorwalkinggroupspluscivicengagementforwalkabilityinruralcommunitiesacomparativeeffectivenesstrialstudyprotocol |