A Scientific Proposal for Surgical Decision-Making in Occult Intertrochanteric Fractures Based on Finite Element Analysis

Background In the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures, there is still a lack of consensus on the optimal approach for isolated greater trochanteric fractures and insufficient intertrochanteric fractures. The limited number of patients and restricted access to accurate assessment of fracture extension using magnetic resonance imaging contribute to the unclear treatment strategy. This study aims to utilize finite element (FE) analysis to analyze stress values at the fracture line and investigate their influence on intertrochanteric fracture extension under different loading conditions. The hypothesis is that fracture extension occurs following certain conditions, supporting the need for surgery based on scientific evidence. Methodology Osseous data from a computed tomography (CT) scan was used to create a proximal femur FE model using FEA software. CT scan data were converted to Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format and used to generate the FE model. Trabecular bone and cortex were meshed into tetrahedral elements. The model consisted of 1,592,642 elements and 282,530 nodes. Two models were created, namely, healthy proximal femur (HF) and femoral insufficient intertrochanteric fracture (FIF). Material properties were assigned based on CT values and conversion equations. The distal end of the femur was constrained. Stress analysis using the dynamic explicit approach was performed. Von Mises stresses were calculated for the proximal femur. The number of elements exceeding yield stress was counted to predict fracture risk by focusing on fracture line spots. In this study, the distribution of von Mises stress was compared between the HF and the FIF models. Six loading combinations were considered, namely, two weight-bearing conditions (3 W loading simulating for walking and 1/3 W for touch-down standing) and three hip flexion angles (0°, 15°, and 23°). Results Under 3 W loading, no significant stress elevations were observed in the HF model at any flexion angles. However, the FIF model exhibited increased stress at the site of the posterior fracture line extension. This stress-induced element destruction was observed in both cortical and cancellous bone. For the 1/3 W loading condition, only minimal stress elevation was observed in both HF and FIF models. To assess the influence on fracture extension, the number of yielded elements was evaluated along the fracture line edges (greater trochanter and middle of the intertrochanteric ridge). Under 3 W loading, the HF model had only one yielded element, indicating minimal fracture risk. In contrast, the FIF model exhibited a notable presence of yield elements in various regions (total/greater trochanter/shaft) at different flexion angles: 0° (115/16/28), 15° (265/158/23), and 23° (446/233/34). Under the 1/3 W loading condition, neither the HF nor the FIF models showed any yielding elements, regardless of the direction of external force. Conclusions The results demonstrated elevated stress levels at the fracture line in the FIF model, particularly during walking, indicating a higher risk of fracture extension at the flex position. However, under reduced weight-bearing conditions, the stress at the fracture site remained within the yield stress range, suggesting a relatively low risk of fracture extension. These findings hold significant clinical implications for developing surgical protocols that consider patients’ compliance with weight-bearing restrictions.