Cargando…

Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction in the treatment of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and Hamada grade 1-2 glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: It is a ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şükrü Kendirci, Alper, Chodza, Mehmet, Şahin, Koray, Bayram, Serkan, Kızılkurt, Taha, Erşen, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670450
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.23049
_version_ 1785114534375063552
author Şükrü Kendirci, Alper
Chodza, Mehmet
Şahin, Koray
Bayram, Serkan
Kızılkurt, Taha
Erşen, Ali
author_facet Şükrü Kendirci, Alper
Chodza, Mehmet
Şahin, Koray
Bayram, Serkan
Kızılkurt, Taha
Erşen, Ali
author_sort Şükrü Kendirci, Alper
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction in the treatment of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and Hamada grade 1-2 glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: It is a retrospective case–control study comparing the prospective results of 2 different treatment methods. This retrospective comparison of groups was conducted between May 2016 and May 2020. The study included 40 people with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy who had arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft or reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included shoulder range of motion, pain, and functional scores (Constant–Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons). RESULTS: The mean age was 61.85 ± 7.56 and 71.10 ± 6.42 years, respectively, for group I [superior capsular reconstruction (n = 20)] and group II [superior capsular reconstruction (n = 20)]. The mean follow-up was 22.30 ± 8.4 and 32.50 ± 8.11 months, respectively. In the postoperative data, flexion degrees and Constant scores were significantly higher in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .007, P = .043). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all parameters (P > .05) except abduction. The increase in abduction value in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group was significantly higher than in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .003). In addition, postoperative data in all parameters in both groups showed significant changes compared to preoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft can provide clinical and functional improvement similar to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10544593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105445932023-10-03 Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study Şükrü Kendirci, Alper Chodza, Mehmet Şahin, Koray Bayram, Serkan Kızılkurt, Taha Erşen, Ali Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction in the treatment of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and Hamada grade 1-2 glenohumeral arthritis. METHODS: It is a retrospective case–control study comparing the prospective results of 2 different treatment methods. This retrospective comparison of groups was conducted between May 2016 and May 2020. The study included 40 people with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear and Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy who had arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft or reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment. Clinical outcome measures included shoulder range of motion, pain, and functional scores (Constant–Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons). RESULTS: The mean age was 61.85 ± 7.56 and 71.10 ± 6.42 years, respectively, for group I [superior capsular reconstruction (n = 20)] and group II [superior capsular reconstruction (n = 20)]. The mean follow-up was 22.30 ± 8.4 and 32.50 ± 8.11 months, respectively. In the postoperative data, flexion degrees and Constant scores were significantly higher in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .007, P = .043). No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all parameters (P > .05) except abduction. The increase in abduction value in the reverse shoulder arthroplasty group was significantly higher than in the superior capsular reconstruction group (P = .003). In addition, postoperative data in all parameters in both groups showed significant changes compared to preoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that superior capsular reconstruction with tensor fascia latae autograft can provide clinical and functional improvement similar to the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with Hamada grade 1-2 arthropathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10544593/ /pubmed/37670450 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.23049 Text en 2023 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Şükrü Kendirci, Alper
Chodza, Mehmet
Şahin, Koray
Bayram, Serkan
Kızılkurt, Taha
Erşen, Ali
Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study
title Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study
title_full Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study
title_fullStr Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study
title_short Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: A comparative clinical study
title_sort arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a comparative clinical study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37670450
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2023.23049
work_keys_str_mv AT sukrukendircialper arthroscopicsuperiorcapsularreconstructionversusreverseshoulderarthroplastyinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcufftearsacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT chodzamehmet arthroscopicsuperiorcapsularreconstructionversusreverseshoulderarthroplastyinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcufftearsacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT sahinkoray arthroscopicsuperiorcapsularreconstructionversusreverseshoulderarthroplastyinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcufftearsacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT bayramserkan arthroscopicsuperiorcapsularreconstructionversusreverseshoulderarthroplastyinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcufftearsacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT kızılkurttaha arthroscopicsuperiorcapsularreconstructionversusreverseshoulderarthroplastyinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcufftearsacomparativeclinicalstudy
AT ersenali arthroscopicsuperiorcapsularreconstructionversusreverseshoulderarthroplastyinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcufftearsacomparativeclinicalstudy