Cargando…

Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil

Soil microorganisms play critical roles in the degradation of micro-and nano-pollutants, and the corresponding proteins and enzymes play roles in pollutant recognition, transportation, and degradation. Our ability to study these pathways from soil samples is often complicated by the complex processe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chacha, Wambura E., Tran, Huu-Tuan, Scarlett, William R., Hutchison, Justin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37786531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104841
_version_ 1785114558532157440
author Chacha, Wambura E.
Tran, Huu-Tuan
Scarlett, William R.
Hutchison, Justin M.
author_facet Chacha, Wambura E.
Tran, Huu-Tuan
Scarlett, William R.
Hutchison, Justin M.
author_sort Chacha, Wambura E.
collection PubMed
description Soil microorganisms play critical roles in the degradation of micro-and nano-pollutants, and the corresponding proteins and enzymes play roles in pollutant recognition, transportation, and degradation. Our ability to study these pathways from soil samples is often complicated by the complex processes involved in extracting proteins from soil matrices. This study aimed to develop a new protein soil extraction protocol that yielded active, intracellular enzymes from the perchlorate degradation pathway, particularly perchlorate reductase. An indirect method, which focused on first separating the cells from the soil matrix, followed by cell lysis and enzyme extraction, was evaluated. The optimized indirect method achieved a final extraction efficiency of the active enzyme and total protein of 15.7 % and 3.3 %, respectively. The final step of separating enzymes from residual soil components resulted in the highest activity and protein losses of 67.7 % ± 14.8 % and 91.8 % ± 1.8 %, respectively. Five buffers, each at different concentrations (0.01 M, 0.05 M, and 0.1 M), were tested to enhance enzyme extraction efficiency. The best extractant requires careful consideration between the highest activity and the quality of the recovered enzymes. Coextraction of humic substances could be minimized by using 0.1 M as compared to 0.01 M and 0.05 M of sodium pyrophosphate; however, this resulted in less recovered activity compared to lower extractant concentrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10544838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105448382023-10-02 Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil Chacha, Wambura E. Tran, Huu-Tuan Scarlett, William R. Hutchison, Justin M. Appl Soil Ecol Article Soil microorganisms play critical roles in the degradation of micro-and nano-pollutants, and the corresponding proteins and enzymes play roles in pollutant recognition, transportation, and degradation. Our ability to study these pathways from soil samples is often complicated by the complex processes involved in extracting proteins from soil matrices. This study aimed to develop a new protein soil extraction protocol that yielded active, intracellular enzymes from the perchlorate degradation pathway, particularly perchlorate reductase. An indirect method, which focused on first separating the cells from the soil matrix, followed by cell lysis and enzyme extraction, was evaluated. The optimized indirect method achieved a final extraction efficiency of the active enzyme and total protein of 15.7 % and 3.3 %, respectively. The final step of separating enzymes from residual soil components resulted in the highest activity and protein losses of 67.7 % ± 14.8 % and 91.8 % ± 1.8 %, respectively. Five buffers, each at different concentrations (0.01 M, 0.05 M, and 0.1 M), were tested to enhance enzyme extraction efficiency. The best extractant requires careful consideration between the highest activity and the quality of the recovered enzymes. Coextraction of humic substances could be minimized by using 0.1 M as compared to 0.01 M and 0.05 M of sodium pyrophosphate; however, this resulted in less recovered activity compared to lower extractant concentrations. 2023-07 2023-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10544838/ /pubmed/37786531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104841 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Chacha, Wambura E.
Tran, Huu-Tuan
Scarlett, William R.
Hutchison, Justin M.
Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
title Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
title_full Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
title_fullStr Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
title_full_unstemmed Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
title_short Extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
title_sort extraction of active, contaminant degrading enzymes from soil
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37786531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104841
work_keys_str_mv AT chachawamburae extractionofactivecontaminantdegradingenzymesfromsoil
AT tranhuutuan extractionofactivecontaminantdegradingenzymesfromsoil
AT scarlettwilliamr extractionofactivecontaminantdegradingenzymesfromsoil
AT hutchisonjustinm extractionofactivecontaminantdegradingenzymesfromsoil