Cargando…

Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats

Background: Respiratory parameters in experimental animals are often characterised under general anaesthesia. However, anaesthesia regimes may alter the functional and mechanical properties of the respiratory system. While most anaesthesia regimes have been shown to affect the respiratory system, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballók, Bence, Schranc, Álmos, Tóth, Ibolya, Somogyi, Petra, Tolnai, József, Peták, Ferenc, Fodor, Gergely H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1249127
_version_ 1785114577884676096
author Ballók, Bence
Schranc, Álmos
Tóth, Ibolya
Somogyi, Petra
Tolnai, József
Peták, Ferenc
Fodor, Gergely H.
author_facet Ballók, Bence
Schranc, Álmos
Tóth, Ibolya
Somogyi, Petra
Tolnai, József
Peták, Ferenc
Fodor, Gergely H.
author_sort Ballók, Bence
collection PubMed
description Background: Respiratory parameters in experimental animals are often characterised under general anaesthesia. However, anaesthesia regimes may alter the functional and mechanical properties of the respiratory system. While most anaesthesia regimes have been shown to affect the respiratory system, the effects of general anaesthesia protocols commonly used in animal models on lung function have not been systematically compared. Methods: The present study comprised 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats divided into five groups (N = 8 in each) according to anaesthesia regime applied: intravenous (iv) Na-pentobarbital, intraperitoneal (ip) ketamine-xylazine, iv propofol-fentanyl, inhaled sevoflurane, and ip urethane. All drugs were administered at commonly used doses. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV), airway resistance (Raw) and tissue mechanics were measured in addition to arterial blood gas parameters during mechanical ventilation while maintaining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values of 0, 3, and 6 cm H(2)O. Respiratory mechanics were also measured during iv methacholine (MCh) challenges to assess bronchial responsiveness. Results: While PEEP influenced baseline respiratory mechanics, EELV and blood gas parameters (p < 0.001), no between-group differences were observed (p > 0.10). Conversely, significantly lower doses of MCh were required to achieve the same elevation in Raw under ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia compared to the other groups. Conclusion: In the most frequent rodent model of respiratory disorders, no differences in baseline respiratory mechanics or function were observed between commonly used anaesthesia regimes. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in response to ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia should be considered when designing experiments using this regime. The findings of the present study indicate commonly used anaesthetic regimes allow fair comparison of respiratory mechanics in experimental animals undergoing any of the examined anaesthesia protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10544940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105449402023-10-03 Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats Ballók, Bence Schranc, Álmos Tóth, Ibolya Somogyi, Petra Tolnai, József Peták, Ferenc Fodor, Gergely H. Front Physiol Physiology Background: Respiratory parameters in experimental animals are often characterised under general anaesthesia. However, anaesthesia regimes may alter the functional and mechanical properties of the respiratory system. While most anaesthesia regimes have been shown to affect the respiratory system, the effects of general anaesthesia protocols commonly used in animal models on lung function have not been systematically compared. Methods: The present study comprised 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats divided into five groups (N = 8 in each) according to anaesthesia regime applied: intravenous (iv) Na-pentobarbital, intraperitoneal (ip) ketamine-xylazine, iv propofol-fentanyl, inhaled sevoflurane, and ip urethane. All drugs were administered at commonly used doses. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV), airway resistance (Raw) and tissue mechanics were measured in addition to arterial blood gas parameters during mechanical ventilation while maintaining positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values of 0, 3, and 6 cm H(2)O. Respiratory mechanics were also measured during iv methacholine (MCh) challenges to assess bronchial responsiveness. Results: While PEEP influenced baseline respiratory mechanics, EELV and blood gas parameters (p < 0.001), no between-group differences were observed (p > 0.10). Conversely, significantly lower doses of MCh were required to achieve the same elevation in Raw under ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia compared to the other groups. Conclusion: In the most frequent rodent model of respiratory disorders, no differences in baseline respiratory mechanics or function were observed between commonly used anaesthesia regimes. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in response to ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia should be considered when designing experiments using this regime. The findings of the present study indicate commonly used anaesthetic regimes allow fair comparison of respiratory mechanics in experimental animals undergoing any of the examined anaesthesia protocols. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10544940/ /pubmed/37791348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1249127 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ballók, Schranc, Tóth, Somogyi, Tolnai, Peták and Fodor. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Ballók, Bence
Schranc, Álmos
Tóth, Ibolya
Somogyi, Petra
Tolnai, József
Peták, Ferenc
Fodor, Gergely H.
Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats
title Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats
title_full Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats
title_fullStr Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats
title_short Comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male Sprague-Dawley rats
title_sort comparison of the respiratory effects of commonly utilized general anaesthesia regimes in male sprague-dawley rats
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10544940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1249127
work_keys_str_mv AT ballokbence comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats
AT schrancalmos comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats
AT tothibolya comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats
AT somogyipetra comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats
AT tolnaijozsef comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats
AT petakferenc comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats
AT fodorgergelyh comparisonoftherespiratoryeffectsofcommonlyutilizedgeneralanaesthesiaregimesinmalespraguedawleyrats