Cargando…

Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study

Evaluate 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients. We conducted an anonymized retrospective observational study of heart transplant patients followed in the University Hospital of Montpellier, France. We analyzed 303 18-FDG P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sagnes, Julie, Battistella, Pascal, Paunet, Tom, Mariano-Goulart, Denis, Kucharczak, Florentin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035296
_version_ 1785114614987489280
author Sagnes, Julie
Battistella, Pascal
Paunet, Tom
Mariano-Goulart, Denis
Kucharczak, Florentin
author_facet Sagnes, Julie
Battistella, Pascal
Paunet, Tom
Mariano-Goulart, Denis
Kucharczak, Florentin
author_sort Sagnes, Julie
collection PubMed
description Evaluate 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients. We conducted an anonymized retrospective observational study of heart transplant patients followed in the University Hospital of Montpellier, France. We analyzed 303 18-FDG PET from 158 patients. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics through uni- and multivariate analysis: in the cancer-free group, comparisons were made between the PET false positive (FP) group versus true negative (TN), and in the cancer group, comparisons were made between the PET false negative (FN) group versus true positive (TP). Out of the 303 exams, we found 245 TN, 26 TP, 26 FP and 6 FN. The sensitivity rate was calculated at 81%, the specificity rate at 90%, the positive predictive value at 50%, and the negative predictive value at 97%. The multivariate analysis showed an association between FP diagnosis and graft-PET delay (P value = .046, OR = 5.14, 95% CI [1.18–32.4]) and creatine reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 10 mg/L (P value = .042, OR = 4.21, 95% CI [1.02–17.2]). The estimated probability of FP by logit regression was 0.48 with 95% CI [0.21–0.77] when graft-PET delay ≥ 6 years and CRP ≥ 10 mg/L. No significative statistical link was found for the demographic or clinical characteristics in the FN group of patients with cancer, except for sex (all FN were men). 18-FDG PET performed very well in the follow-up of heart transplant patients for neoplasia screening, with better specificity than sensitivity. However, the study showed that almost 50% of FP can be predicted by considering only the graft-PET delay and CRP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10545140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105451402023-10-03 Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study Sagnes, Julie Battistella, Pascal Paunet, Tom Mariano-Goulart, Denis Kucharczak, Florentin Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 Evaluate 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients. We conducted an anonymized retrospective observational study of heart transplant patients followed in the University Hospital of Montpellier, France. We analyzed 303 18-FDG PET from 158 patients. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics through uni- and multivariate analysis: in the cancer-free group, comparisons were made between the PET false positive (FP) group versus true negative (TN), and in the cancer group, comparisons were made between the PET false negative (FN) group versus true positive (TP). Out of the 303 exams, we found 245 TN, 26 TP, 26 FP and 6 FN. The sensitivity rate was calculated at 81%, the specificity rate at 90%, the positive predictive value at 50%, and the negative predictive value at 97%. The multivariate analysis showed an association between FP diagnosis and graft-PET delay (P value = .046, OR = 5.14, 95% CI [1.18–32.4]) and creatine reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 10 mg/L (P value = .042, OR = 4.21, 95% CI [1.02–17.2]). The estimated probability of FP by logit regression was 0.48 with 95% CI [0.21–0.77] when graft-PET delay ≥ 6 years and CRP ≥ 10 mg/L. No significative statistical link was found for the demographic or clinical characteristics in the FN group of patients with cancer, except for sex (all FN were men). 18-FDG PET performed very well in the follow-up of heart transplant patients for neoplasia screening, with better specificity than sensitivity. However, the study showed that almost 50% of FP can be predicted by considering only the graft-PET delay and CRP. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10545140/ /pubmed/37773869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035296 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 6800
Sagnes, Julie
Battistella, Pascal
Paunet, Tom
Mariano-Goulart, Denis
Kucharczak, Florentin
Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
title Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
title_full Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
title_fullStr Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
title_short Evaluation of 18-FDG PET diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
title_sort evaluation of 18-fdg pet diagnostic capabilities for cancer screening in heart transplant patients, a retrospective study
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035296
work_keys_str_mv AT sagnesjulie evaluationof18fdgpetdiagnosticcapabilitiesforcancerscreeninginhearttransplantpatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT battistellapascal evaluationof18fdgpetdiagnosticcapabilitiesforcancerscreeninginhearttransplantpatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT paunettom evaluationof18fdgpetdiagnosticcapabilitiesforcancerscreeninginhearttransplantpatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT marianogoulartdenis evaluationof18fdgpetdiagnosticcapabilitiesforcancerscreeninginhearttransplantpatientsaretrospectivestudy
AT kucharczakflorentin evaluationof18fdgpetdiagnosticcapabilitiesforcancerscreeninginhearttransplantpatientsaretrospectivestudy