Cargando…

Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Liping, Yan, Huilei, Sun, Yalei, Zhu, Yan, Wu, Yudong, Chen, Zhipeng, Su, Shunye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027745
_version_ 1785114653815209984
author Xia, Liping
Yan, Huilei
Sun, Yalei
Zhu, Yan
Wu, Yudong
Chen, Zhipeng
Su, Shunye
author_facet Xia, Liping
Yan, Huilei
Sun, Yalei
Zhu, Yan
Wu, Yudong
Chen, Zhipeng
Su, Shunye
author_sort Xia, Liping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials from 2000 to May 2021 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that referred to the use of TNS and antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight publications involving 420 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the analysis, we found TNS had a comparable effect with antimuscarinic agents on micturition per day, nocturia, urge incontinence, and voided volume (P = .9; .4; .78; .44, respectively). Scores measured by questionnaires Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form items also indicated no statistical difference between 2 groups. TNS group had a significantly less discontinuation rate and adverse events (P = .003; .0001). CONCLUSIONS: TNS is as effective as antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB. Moreover, TNS appears to be more tolerable and safer than antimuscarinic agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10545354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105453542023-10-03 Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome Xia, Liping Yan, Huilei Sun, Yalei Zhu, Yan Wu, Yudong Chen, Zhipeng Su, Shunye Medicine (Baltimore) 7400 OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials from 2000 to May 2021 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that referred to the use of TNS and antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight publications involving 420 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the analysis, we found TNS had a comparable effect with antimuscarinic agents on micturition per day, nocturia, urge incontinence, and voided volume (P = .9; .4; .78; .44, respectively). Scores measured by questionnaires Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form items also indicated no statistical difference between 2 groups. TNS group had a significantly less discontinuation rate and adverse events (P = .003; .0001). CONCLUSIONS: TNS is as effective as antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB. Moreover, TNS appears to be more tolerable and safer than antimuscarinic agents. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10545354/ /pubmed/34766587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027745 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7400
Xia, Liping
Yan, Huilei
Sun, Yalei
Zhu, Yan
Wu, Yudong
Chen, Zhipeng
Su, Shunye
Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
title Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
title_full Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
title_fullStr Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
title_short Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
title_sort pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
topic 7400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027745
work_keys_str_mv AT xialiping pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT yanhuilei pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT sunyalei pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT zhuyan pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT wuyudong pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT chenzhipeng pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome
AT sushunye pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome