Cargando…
Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027745 |
_version_ | 1785114653815209984 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Liping Yan, Huilei Sun, Yalei Zhu, Yan Wu, Yudong Chen, Zhipeng Su, Shunye |
author_facet | Xia, Liping Yan, Huilei Sun, Yalei Zhu, Yan Wu, Yudong Chen, Zhipeng Su, Shunye |
author_sort | Xia, Liping |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials from 2000 to May 2021 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that referred to the use of TNS and antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight publications involving 420 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the analysis, we found TNS had a comparable effect with antimuscarinic agents on micturition per day, nocturia, urge incontinence, and voided volume (P = .9; .4; .78; .44, respectively). Scores measured by questionnaires Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form items also indicated no statistical difference between 2 groups. TNS group had a significantly less discontinuation rate and adverse events (P = .003; .0001). CONCLUSIONS: TNS is as effective as antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB. Moreover, TNS appears to be more tolerable and safer than antimuscarinic agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10545354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105453542023-10-03 Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome Xia, Liping Yan, Huilei Sun, Yalei Zhu, Yan Wu, Yudong Chen, Zhipeng Su, Shunye Medicine (Baltimore) 7400 OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials from 2000 to May 2021 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials that referred to the use of TNS and antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Eight publications involving 420 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In the analysis, we found TNS had a comparable effect with antimuscarinic agents on micturition per day, nocturia, urge incontinence, and voided volume (P = .9; .4; .78; .44, respectively). Scores measured by questionnaires Overactive Bladder Symptom Score and Overactive Bladder questionnaire Short Form items also indicated no statistical difference between 2 groups. TNS group had a significantly less discontinuation rate and adverse events (P = .003; .0001). CONCLUSIONS: TNS is as effective as antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of OAB. Moreover, TNS appears to be more tolerable and safer than antimuscarinic agents. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10545354/ /pubmed/34766587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027745 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7400 Xia, Liping Yan, Huilei Sun, Yalei Zhu, Yan Wu, Yudong Chen, Zhipeng Su, Shunye Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
title | Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
title_full | Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
title_fullStr | Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
title_short | Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
title_sort | pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of tibial nerve stimulation versus antimuscarinic agents in the management of overactive bladder syndrome |
topic | 7400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34766587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xialiping pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome AT yanhuilei pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome AT sunyalei pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome AT zhuyan pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome AT wuyudong pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome AT chenzhipeng pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome AT sushunye pooledanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyoftibialnervestimulationversusantimuscarinicagentsinthemanagementofoveractivebladdersyndrome |