Cargando…
Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting the application of radiomics to imaging techniques in patients with ovarian lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. Usin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y |
_version_ | 1785114711875911680 |
---|---|
author | Adusumilli, Pratik Ravikumar, Nishant Hall, Geoff Swift, Sarah Orsi, Nicolas Scarsbrook, Andrew |
author_facet | Adusumilli, Pratik Ravikumar, Nishant Hall, Geoff Swift, Sarah Orsi, Nicolas Scarsbrook, Andrew |
author_sort | Adusumilli, Pratik |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting the application of radiomics to imaging techniques in patients with ovarian lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. Using PRISMA criteria, data were extracted from short-listed studies. Validity and bias were assessed independently by 2 researchers in consensus using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) was utilised to assess radiomic methodology. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 63 articles were identified, of which 33 were eligible. Fifteen assessed lesion classifications, 10 treatment outcomes, 5 outcome predictions, 2 metastatic disease predictions and 1 classification/outcome prediction. The sample size ranged from 28 to 501 patients. Twelve studies investigated CT, 11 MRI, 4 ultrasound and 1 FDG PET-CT. Twenty-three studies (70%) incorporated 3D segmentation. Various modelling methods were used, most commonly LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) (10/33). Five studies (15%) compared radiomic models to radiologist interpretation, all demonstrating superior performance. Only 6 studies (18%) included external validation. Five studies (15%) had a low overall risk of bias, 9 (27%) moderate, and 19 (58%) high risk of bias. The highest RQS achieved was 61.1%, and the lowest was − 16.7%. CONCLUSION: Radiomics has the potential as a clinical diagnostic tool in patients with ovarian masses and may allow better lesion stratification, guiding more personalised patient care in the future. Standardisation of the feature extraction methodology, larger and more diverse patient cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics is emerging as a tool for enhancing clinical decisions in patients with ovarian masses. • Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. • Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10545652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105456522023-10-04 Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review Adusumilli, Pratik Ravikumar, Nishant Hall, Geoff Swift, Sarah Orsi, Nicolas Scarsbrook, Andrew Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting the application of radiomics to imaging techniques in patients with ovarian lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. Using PRISMA criteria, data were extracted from short-listed studies. Validity and bias were assessed independently by 2 researchers in consensus using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) was utilised to assess radiomic methodology. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 63 articles were identified, of which 33 were eligible. Fifteen assessed lesion classifications, 10 treatment outcomes, 5 outcome predictions, 2 metastatic disease predictions and 1 classification/outcome prediction. The sample size ranged from 28 to 501 patients. Twelve studies investigated CT, 11 MRI, 4 ultrasound and 1 FDG PET-CT. Twenty-three studies (70%) incorporated 3D segmentation. Various modelling methods were used, most commonly LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) (10/33). Five studies (15%) compared radiomic models to radiologist interpretation, all demonstrating superior performance. Only 6 studies (18%) included external validation. Five studies (15%) had a low overall risk of bias, 9 (27%) moderate, and 19 (58%) high risk of bias. The highest RQS achieved was 61.1%, and the lowest was − 16.7%. CONCLUSION: Radiomics has the potential as a clinical diagnostic tool in patients with ovarian masses and may allow better lesion stratification, guiding more personalised patient care in the future. Standardisation of the feature extraction methodology, larger and more diverse patient cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics is emerging as a tool for enhancing clinical decisions in patients with ovarian masses. • Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. • Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y. Springer Vienna 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10545652/ /pubmed/37782375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Adusumilli, Pratik Ravikumar, Nishant Hall, Geoff Swift, Sarah Orsi, Nicolas Scarsbrook, Andrew Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
title | Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
title_full | Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
title_short | Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
title_sort | radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adusumillipratik radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview AT ravikumarnishant radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview AT hallgeoff radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview AT swiftsarah radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview AT orsinicolas radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview AT scarsbrookandrew radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview |