Cargando…

Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting the application of radiomics to imaging techniques in patients with ovarian lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. Usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adusumilli, Pratik, Ravikumar, Nishant, Hall, Geoff, Swift, Sarah, Orsi, Nicolas, Scarsbrook, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y
_version_ 1785114711875911680
author Adusumilli, Pratik
Ravikumar, Nishant
Hall, Geoff
Swift, Sarah
Orsi, Nicolas
Scarsbrook, Andrew
author_facet Adusumilli, Pratik
Ravikumar, Nishant
Hall, Geoff
Swift, Sarah
Orsi, Nicolas
Scarsbrook, Andrew
author_sort Adusumilli, Pratik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting the application of radiomics to imaging techniques in patients with ovarian lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. Using PRISMA criteria, data were extracted from short-listed studies. Validity and bias were assessed independently by 2 researchers in consensus using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) was utilised to assess radiomic methodology. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 63 articles were identified, of which 33 were eligible. Fifteen assessed lesion classifications, 10 treatment outcomes, 5 outcome predictions, 2 metastatic disease predictions and 1 classification/outcome prediction. The sample size ranged from 28 to 501 patients. Twelve studies investigated CT, 11 MRI, 4 ultrasound and 1 FDG PET-CT. Twenty-three studies (70%) incorporated 3D segmentation. Various modelling methods were used, most commonly LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) (10/33). Five studies (15%) compared radiomic models to radiologist interpretation, all demonstrating superior performance. Only 6 studies (18%) included external validation. Five studies (15%) had a low overall risk of bias, 9 (27%) moderate, and 19 (58%) high risk of bias. The highest RQS achieved was 61.1%, and the lowest was − 16.7%. CONCLUSION: Radiomics has the potential as a clinical diagnostic tool in patients with ovarian masses and may allow better lesion stratification, guiding more personalised patient care in the future. Standardisation of the feature extraction methodology, larger and more diverse patient cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics is emerging as a tool for enhancing clinical decisions in patients with ovarian masses. • Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. • Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10545652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105456522023-10-04 Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review Adusumilli, Pratik Ravikumar, Nishant Hall, Geoff Swift, Sarah Orsi, Nicolas Scarsbrook, Andrew Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting the application of radiomics to imaging techniques in patients with ovarian lesions. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, Ovid and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant articles. Using PRISMA criteria, data were extracted from short-listed studies. Validity and bias were assessed independently by 2 researchers in consensus using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Radiomic Quality Score (RQS) was utilised to assess radiomic methodology. RESULTS: After duplicate removal, 63 articles were identified, of which 33 were eligible. Fifteen assessed lesion classifications, 10 treatment outcomes, 5 outcome predictions, 2 metastatic disease predictions and 1 classification/outcome prediction. The sample size ranged from 28 to 501 patients. Twelve studies investigated CT, 11 MRI, 4 ultrasound and 1 FDG PET-CT. Twenty-three studies (70%) incorporated 3D segmentation. Various modelling methods were used, most commonly LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) (10/33). Five studies (15%) compared radiomic models to radiologist interpretation, all demonstrating superior performance. Only 6 studies (18%) included external validation. Five studies (15%) had a low overall risk of bias, 9 (27%) moderate, and 19 (58%) high risk of bias. The highest RQS achieved was 61.1%, and the lowest was − 16.7%. CONCLUSION: Radiomics has the potential as a clinical diagnostic tool in patients with ovarian masses and may allow better lesion stratification, guiding more personalised patient care in the future. Standardisation of the feature extraction methodology, larger and more diverse patient cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics is emerging as a tool for enhancing clinical decisions in patients with ovarian masses. • Radiomics shows promising results in improving lesion stratification, treatment selection and outcome prediction. • Modelling with larger cohorts and real-world evaluation is required before clinical translation. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y. Springer Vienna 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10545652/ /pubmed/37782375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Adusumilli, Pratik
Ravikumar, Nishant
Hall, Geoff
Swift, Sarah
Orsi, Nicolas
Scarsbrook, Andrew
Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
title Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
title_full Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
title_fullStr Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
title_short Radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
title_sort radiomics in the evaluation of ovarian masses — a systematic review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37782375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01500-y
work_keys_str_mv AT adusumillipratik radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview
AT ravikumarnishant radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview
AT hallgeoff radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview
AT swiftsarah radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview
AT orsinicolas radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview
AT scarsbrookandrew radiomicsintheevaluationofovarianmassesasystematicreview