Cargando…

Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy

OBJECTIVES: Many people with type 2 diabetes experience clinical inertia, remaining in poor glycaemic control on oral glucose-lowering medications rather than intensifying treatment with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, despite an efficacious, orally administered option, oral semaglutide,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Hongye, Berry, Sasha, Malkin, Samuel Joseph Paul, Hunt, Barnaby, Bain, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070473
_version_ 1785114816043548672
author Ren, Hongye
Berry, Sasha
Malkin, Samuel Joseph Paul
Hunt, Barnaby
Bain, Stephen
author_facet Ren, Hongye
Berry, Sasha
Malkin, Samuel Joseph Paul
Hunt, Barnaby
Bain, Stephen
author_sort Ren, Hongye
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Many people with type 2 diabetes experience clinical inertia, remaining in poor glycaemic control on oral glucose-lowering medications rather than intensifying treatment with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, despite an efficacious, orally administered option, oral semaglutide, being available. The present study evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of initiating oral semaglutide versus continuing metformin plus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor therapy in the UK. DESIGN: Outcomes were projected over patients’ lifetimes using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (V.9.0). Clinical data were taken from the oral semaglutide and placebo arms of the patient subgroup receiving metformin plus an SGLT-2 inhibitor in PIONEER 4. Costs, expressed in 2021 Pounds sterling (GBP), were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective. INTERVENTIONS: Modelled patients received oral semaglutide immediately (in the first year of the analysis) or after a 2-year delay, after which all physiological parameters were brought to values observed in the immediate therapy arm. During the simulation, patients intensified with the addition of basal insulin and, subsequently, by switching to basal-bolus insulin. RESULTS: Immediate oral semaglutide therapy was associated with improvements in life expectancy of 0.17 (95% CIs 0.16 to 0.19) years, and quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.15 (0.14 to 0.16) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), versus a 2-year delay. Benefits were due to a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications. Direct costs were estimated to be GBP 1423 (1349 to 1496) higher with immediate oral semaglutide therapy versus a 2-year delay, with higher treatment costs partially offset by cost savings from avoidance of diabetes-related complications. Immediate oral semaglutide therapy was therefore associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GBP 9404 (8380 to 10 538) per QALY gained versus a 2-year delay. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate oral semaglutide is likely to represent a cost-effective treatment in people with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin plus an SGLT-2 inhibitor in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02863419.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10546165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105461652023-10-04 Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy Ren, Hongye Berry, Sasha Malkin, Samuel Joseph Paul Hunt, Barnaby Bain, Stephen BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Many people with type 2 diabetes experience clinical inertia, remaining in poor glycaemic control on oral glucose-lowering medications rather than intensifying treatment with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, despite an efficacious, orally administered option, oral semaglutide, being available. The present study evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of initiating oral semaglutide versus continuing metformin plus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor therapy in the UK. DESIGN: Outcomes were projected over patients’ lifetimes using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (V.9.0). Clinical data were taken from the oral semaglutide and placebo arms of the patient subgroup receiving metformin plus an SGLT-2 inhibitor in PIONEER 4. Costs, expressed in 2021 Pounds sterling (GBP), were accounted from a healthcare payer perspective. INTERVENTIONS: Modelled patients received oral semaglutide immediately (in the first year of the analysis) or after a 2-year delay, after which all physiological parameters were brought to values observed in the immediate therapy arm. During the simulation, patients intensified with the addition of basal insulin and, subsequently, by switching to basal-bolus insulin. RESULTS: Immediate oral semaglutide therapy was associated with improvements in life expectancy of 0.17 (95% CIs 0.16 to 0.19) years, and quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.15 (0.14 to 0.16) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), versus a 2-year delay. Benefits were due to a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications. Direct costs were estimated to be GBP 1423 (1349 to 1496) higher with immediate oral semaglutide therapy versus a 2-year delay, with higher treatment costs partially offset by cost savings from avoidance of diabetes-related complications. Immediate oral semaglutide therapy was therefore associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of GBP 9404 (8380 to 10 538) per QALY gained versus a 2-year delay. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate oral semaglutide is likely to represent a cost-effective treatment in people with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin plus an SGLT-2 inhibitor in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02863419. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10546165/ /pubmed/37775297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070473 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Economics
Ren, Hongye
Berry, Sasha
Malkin, Samuel Joseph Paul
Hunt, Barnaby
Bain, Stephen
Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy
title Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy
title_full Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy
title_fullStr Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy
title_full_unstemmed Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy
title_short Early use of oral semaglutide in the UK: A cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy
title_sort early use of oral semaglutide in the uk: a cost-effectiveness analysis versus continuing metformin and sglt-2 inhibitor therapy
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070473
work_keys_str_mv AT renhongye earlyuseoforalsemaglutideintheukacosteffectivenessanalysisversuscontinuingmetforminandsglt2inhibitortherapy
AT berrysasha earlyuseoforalsemaglutideintheukacosteffectivenessanalysisversuscontinuingmetforminandsglt2inhibitortherapy
AT malkinsamueljosephpaul earlyuseoforalsemaglutideintheukacosteffectivenessanalysisversuscontinuingmetforminandsglt2inhibitortherapy
AT huntbarnaby earlyuseoforalsemaglutideintheukacosteffectivenessanalysisversuscontinuingmetforminandsglt2inhibitortherapy
AT bainstephen earlyuseoforalsemaglutideintheukacosteffectivenessanalysisversuscontinuingmetforminandsglt2inhibitortherapy