Cargando…
The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units
BACKGROUND: The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential skill in the practice of emergency medicine (EM), with benefit to patient care by improving diagnostic accuracy. Despite this, there exists little data evaluating the use of POCUS in South African emergency units (EUs.). METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37916695 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5711 |
_version_ | 1785114830805401600 |
---|---|
author | Hurribunce, Nirvika Lalloo, Vidya Prozesky, Benjamin V. Human, Rulé Prozesky, Detlef R. Geyser, Maria M. Engelbrecht, Andreas |
author_facet | Hurribunce, Nirvika Lalloo, Vidya Prozesky, Benjamin V. Human, Rulé Prozesky, Detlef R. Geyser, Maria M. Engelbrecht, Andreas |
author_sort | Hurribunce, Nirvika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential skill in the practice of emergency medicine (EM), with benefit to patient care by improving diagnostic accuracy. Despite this, there exists little data evaluating the use of POCUS in South African emergency units (EUs.). METHODS: One hundred and seventeen doctors working in 12 public and private sector EUs in Tshwane were included. A questionnaire was used comprising of descriptive data regarding doctor demographics, levels of experience, and outcome data including POCUS frequency use, training level, indications for, and barriers to its use. RESULTS: Many participants were general practitioners working in EUs (58.1%) followed by EM specialists and EM registrars. Of these participants, 88% used POCUS. Seventy one percent received informal POCUS training only. The indications for POCUS use were similar for both public and private sector, with no significant differences in overall use. The only significant association to POCUS use was age (> 33.3 years) and number of years since qualification (> 6.9 years.) Lack of and/or access to training were the main reasons for not using POCUS (18.8%.) There were no significant differences in the barriers to the use of POCUS between the sectors. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasound is used similarly in both public and private sector EUs in Tshwane. Lack of and/or access to POCUS training are the main barrier to its use. CONTRIBUTION: This study underlines the state of POCUS use in Tshwane and highlights the barriers to its use, thus allowing academic heads and hospital managers to address them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10546228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105462282023-10-04 The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units Hurribunce, Nirvika Lalloo, Vidya Prozesky, Benjamin V. Human, Rulé Prozesky, Detlef R. Geyser, Maria M. Engelbrecht, Andreas S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential skill in the practice of emergency medicine (EM), with benefit to patient care by improving diagnostic accuracy. Despite this, there exists little data evaluating the use of POCUS in South African emergency units (EUs.). METHODS: One hundred and seventeen doctors working in 12 public and private sector EUs in Tshwane were included. A questionnaire was used comprising of descriptive data regarding doctor demographics, levels of experience, and outcome data including POCUS frequency use, training level, indications for, and barriers to its use. RESULTS: Many participants were general practitioners working in EUs (58.1%) followed by EM specialists and EM registrars. Of these participants, 88% used POCUS. Seventy one percent received informal POCUS training only. The indications for POCUS use were similar for both public and private sector, with no significant differences in overall use. The only significant association to POCUS use was age (> 33.3 years) and number of years since qualification (> 6.9 years.) Lack of and/or access to training were the main reasons for not using POCUS (18.8%.) There were no significant differences in the barriers to the use of POCUS between the sectors. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care ultrasound is used similarly in both public and private sector EUs in Tshwane. Lack of and/or access to POCUS training are the main barrier to its use. CONTRIBUTION: This study underlines the state of POCUS use in Tshwane and highlights the barriers to its use, thus allowing academic heads and hospital managers to address them. AOSIS 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10546228/ /pubmed/37916695 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5711 Text en © 2023. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hurribunce, Nirvika Lalloo, Vidya Prozesky, Benjamin V. Human, Rulé Prozesky, Detlef R. Geyser, Maria M. Engelbrecht, Andreas The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
title | The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
title_full | The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
title_fullStr | The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
title_short | The use of point-of-care ultrasound in Tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
title_sort | use of point-of-care ultrasound in tshwane public and private sector emergency units |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37916695 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5711 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hurribuncenirvika theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT lalloovidya theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT prozeskybenjaminv theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT humanrule theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT prozeskydetlefr theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT geysermariam theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT engelbrechtandreas theuseofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT hurribuncenirvika useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT lalloovidya useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT prozeskybenjaminv useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT humanrule useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT prozeskydetlefr useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT geysermariam useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits AT engelbrechtandreas useofpointofcareultrasoundintshwanepublicandprivatesectoremergencyunits |