Cargando…

Semisupervised Learning with Report-guided Pseudo Labels for Deep Learning–based Prostate Cancer Detection Using Biparametric MRI

PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel method of semisupervised learning (SSL) guided by automated sparse information from diagnostic reports to leverage additional data for deep learning–based malignancy detection in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosma, Joeran S., Saha, Anindo, Hosseinzadeh, Matin, Slootweg, Ivan, de Rooij, Maarten, Huisman, Henkjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Radiological Society of North America 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10546362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37795142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230031
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel method of semisupervised learning (SSL) guided by automated sparse information from diagnostic reports to leverage additional data for deep learning–based malignancy detection in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 7756 prostate MRI examinations (6380 patients) performed between January 2014 and December 2020 for model development. An SSL method, report-guided SSL (RG-SSL), was developed for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric MRI. RG-SSL, supervised learning (SL), and state-of-the-art SSL methods were trained using 100, 300, 1000, or 3050 manually annotated examinations. Performance on detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by RG-SSL, SL, and SSL was compared on 300 unseen examinations from an external center with a histopathologically confirmed reference standard. Performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC analysis. P values for performance differences were generated with a permutation test. RESULTS: At 100 manually annotated examinations, mean examination-based diagnostic area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for RG-SSL, SL, and the best SSL were 0.86 ± 0.01 (SD), 0.78 ± 0.03, and 0.81 ± 0.02, respectively. Lesion-based detection partial AUCs were 0.62 ± 0.02, 0.44 ± 0.04, and 0.48 ± 0.09, respectively. Examination-based performance of SL with 3050 examinations was matched by RG-SSL with 169 manually annotated examinations, thus requiring 14 times fewer annotations. Lesion-based performance was matched with 431 manually annotated examinations, requiring six times fewer annotations. CONCLUSION: RG-SSL outperformed SSL in clinically significant prostate cancer detection and achieved performance similar to SL even at very low annotation budgets. Keywords: Annotation Efficiency, Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis, MRI, Prostate Cancer, Semisupervised Deep Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.